This document is page 'vi' (Page 7 of 113) of a legal filing dated February 28, 2023, bearing the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00021054. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents referenced in the main brief, including cases such as 'Hudson Valley Black Press v. I.R.S.' and 'Martin v. Hadix'. The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice filing, likely related to a FOIA case or appeal given the OGR marking.
This document is page 55 (PDF page 70) of a legal brief filed on February 28, 2023, in Case 22-1426. The text presents a legal argument regarding the 'Landgraf test' and statutory interpretation, specifically arguing that the Child Abduction Prevention Act of 2003 (H.R. 1104) was not intended to apply retroactively because Congress explicitly rejected a proviso that would have allowed it to cover conduct predating the enactment. The page relies on various Supreme Court and Circuit Court citations to support the argument that rejected legislative proposals are significant indicators of congressional intent.
This document is an email from Jes Staley to Jeffrey Epstein dated September 26, 2014. Staley briefly acknowledges an article Epstein had sent him about Kathryn Ruemmler, a former White House counsel being considered for Attorney General. The forwarded text details Ruemmler's qualifications, her close advisory role to President Obama, and potential political obstacles to her nomination, such as her involvement in the I.R.S. and Benghazi controversies.
This document is page 254 from a book or report, specifically the endnotes for a chapter titled "Did Snowden Act Alone?". Contrary to the prompt's premise, this document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein; its content is exclusively about Edward Snowden and other historical figures involved in espionage and whistleblowing. The page lists ten citations referencing interviews, news articles, and books, and includes a footer "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020406" which suggests it may be from a U.S. House Oversight Committee report.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity