DOJ-OGR-00021054.jpg

567 KB

Extraction Summary

11
People
10
Organizations
6
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (table of authorities)
File Size: 567 KB
Summary

This document is page 'vi' (Page 7 of 113) of a legal filing dated February 28, 2023, bearing the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00021054. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents referenced in the main brief, including cases such as 'Hudson Valley Black Press v. I.R.S.' and 'Martin v. Hadix'. The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice filing, likely related to a FOIA case or appeal given the OGR marking.

People (11)

Name Role Context
Arnett Party in legal citation
In re Arnett
James Party in legal citation
James v. U.S.
Johnson Party in legal citation
Johnson v. U.S.
Kaplan Party in legal citation
Kaplan v. C.I.R.
Kawashima Party in legal citation
Kawashima v. Holder
Landgraf Party in legal citation
Landgraf v. USI Film Prod.
Lattab Party in legal citation
Lattab v. Ashcroft
Leocal Party in legal citation
Leocal v. Ashcroft
Little Party in legal citation
Little v. U.S.
Margalli-Olvera Party in legal citation
Margalli-Olvera v. I.N.S.
Martin Party in legal citation
Martin v. Hadix; Martin v. Hunter's Lessee

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,266 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page7 of 113
Hudson Valley Black Press v. I.R.S.,
409 F.3d 106 (2d Cir. 2005) ......................................................................................55
In re Arnett,
804 F.2d 1200 (11th Cir. 1986) ..................................................................................27
James v. U.S.,
550 U.S. 192 (2007)....................................................................................................50
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. DRK Photo,
882 F.3d 394 (2d Cir. 2018) .......................................................................................27
Johnson v. U.S.,
576 U.S. 591 (2015)....................................................................................................50
Kaplan v. C.I.R.,
Case No. 25652-12, 2014 WL 988456 (U.S. Tax Ct. Mar. 13, 2014) .... 26-27
Kawashima v. Holder,
565 U.S. 478 (2012)........................................................................................44, 45, 50
Landgraf v. USI Film Prod.,
511 U.S. 244 (1994)..............................................................................................passim
LaSalle Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Nomura Asset Capital Corp.,
424 F.3d 195 (2d Cir. 2005) .......................................................................................34
Lattab v. Ashcroft,
384 F.3d 8 (1st Cir. 2004)...........................................................................................55
Leocal v. Ashcroft,
543 U.S. 1 (2004)........................................................................................................45
Little v. U.S.,
Nos. 1:08-cr-59, 1:09-cv-822, 2010 WL 3942749
(S.D. Ohio Oct. 7, 2010).............................................................................................21
Margalli-Olvera v. I.N.S.,
43 F.3d 345 (8th Cir. 1994) .......................................................................................20
Martin v. Hadix,
527 U.S. 343 (1999)....................................................................................................55
Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee,
14 U.S. 304 (1816)......................................................................................................54
vi
DOJ-OGR-00021054

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document