You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM

Organization
Mentions
701
Relationships
2
Events
0
Documents
344

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
6
1
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Professional employment
6
1
View
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00029301.pdf

This document is an email thread from October 2021 regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (specifically a letter regarding legal mail) to prosecutors at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and her co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email was then forwarded internally within the USANYS office.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00029294.pdf

This document is an email thread from October 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and government representatives (including Christian Everdell). Sternheim complains that legal materials (a hard drive and books) sent by the government via FedEx were delivered to the MDC on October 12, 2021, but had not been given to Maxwell as of October 14. The document includes screenshots of FedEx tracking information (Tracking #8166 1429 9130 and #8166 1429 9141) confirming delivery to Brooklyn, NY.

Email correspondence with attachments (screenshots)
2025-12-25

EFTA00029237.pdf

This document is an email signature block or letterhead footer for Bobbi C. Sternheim, Esq. It includes contact details (with phone numbers redacted), a Covid-19 notice regarding remote work, and a standard legal confidentiality disclaimer. The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00029237.

Legal correspondence / email signature block
2025-12-25

EFTA00028974.pdf

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on March 15, 2021, supporting a motion to dismiss counts 1-4 of the superseding indictment. The defense argues that the indictment lacks specificity regarding names, dates, and details of the allegations, preventing Maxwell from preparing an adequate defense. The filing criticizes the government for using vague categories like 'Minor Victims' and 'multiple minor girls' without clarification and cites legal precedents to argue that the lack of specificity violates due process.

Legal filing (reply memorandum)
2025-12-25

EFTA00028968.pdf

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed on March 15, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues that Counts 1 and 3 of the Superseding Indictment are multiplicitous (charging the same crime twice based on identical facts) and requests the Court order the government to elect one count to prosecute and dismiss the other prior to trial to avoid jury prejudice. The filing contends that the government has failed to prove the existence of two distinct conspiracies.

Legal pleading (reply memorandum)
2025-12-25

EFTA00028929.pdf

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, requesting the suppression of evidence obtained from a government subpoena to Boies Schiller and dismissal of counts five and six. It includes a Table of Contents, Table of Authorities citing various legal cases and rules, and a Table of Exhibits detailing communications and notes related to the case from 2016 to 2021, many involving AUSAs and individuals like Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, Brad Edwards, and Sigrid McCawley. The memorandum argues that the government misled the court and that the evidence should be suppressed due to due process violations.

Legal filing (reply memorandum)
2025-12-25

EFTA00028903.pdf

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on March 15, 2021, supporting a motion to dismiss counts one through four of her indictment as time-barred. The defense argues that the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283, which extended the statute of limitations, cannot be applied retroactively because Congress explicitly rejected a retroactivity provision. Additionally, the defense contends that the Mann Act offenses charged (enticement to travel and transportation of a minor) do not 'necessarily entail' the sexual abuse of a child, and thus the extended statute of limitations under § 3283 does not apply.

Legal memorandum (reply memorandum in support of motion to dismiss)
2025-12-25

EFTA00028880.pdf

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on March 15, 2021, supporting her motion to dismiss the indictment based on the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Jeffrey Epstein signed in Florida. Maxwell argues that the NPA's clause immunizing 'potential co-conspirators of Epstein' explicitly covers her and bars the current prosecution in the Southern District of New York. The defense contends that the government's attempt to limit the NPA geographically (to Florida) or to specific crimes is contradicted by the plain text of the agreement and legal precedent regarding plea agreements.

Legal reply memorandum (united states district court, southern district of new york)
2025-12-25

EFTA00028733.pdf

A discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated May 20, 2021. The production includes 'Interlochen records' and native 'carved' image files from various electronic devices (identified by codes such as NYC024321) that were previously produced in PDF format. The letter and materials are marked confidential under a Protective Order.

Legal correspondence / discovery production letter
2025-12-25

EFTA00028257.pdf

A letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated November 9, 2021, regarding the production of discovery materials (Jencks Act and Giglio) for her trial. The letter explains that materials previously designated as 'confidential' are now marked with a specific reference to the Protective Order paragraphs to avoid confusion with classified document markings.

Legal correspondence / discovery letter
2025-12-25

EFTA00028100.pdf

An email chain from October 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, demanding immediate confirmation of the status of legal mail at the MDC. Sternheim notes that USPO tracking shows mail available for pickup that the facility has not retrieved, and threatens court action if not resolved. The chain includes a signature block for Isabel Maxwell, acting as a paralegal for the Law Offices of Leah Saffian.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00027749.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 14-15, 2021, involving the U.S. Attorney's Office (USANYS) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. Following a letter filed by defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding legal mail at the MDC, Judge Nathan ordered the prosecution to respond by 5 PM on October 15. The emails depict the prosecution team scrambling to draft a response, coordinating with the BOP and a contact named Sophia at the MDC, and expressing frustration regarding the tight deadlines imposed by Judge Nathan.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00027301.pdf

This document is a discovery production letter from the DOJ to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 5, 2021. It lists materials being turned over, including files recovered from discs seized at Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence, images from his electronic devices, Missouri records, a JPMorgan Chase return, and a 1995 Oxford letter. The letter also clarifies confidentiality designations under the Protective Order.

Legal correspondence / discovery production letter
2025-12-25

EFTA00027296.pdf

This document is a discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 4, 2021. It lists produced materials including FBI recovered metadata, Missouri records, a JPMorgan Chase return, and a letter from 1995 related to Oxford. The letter also clarifies new labeling protocols for confidential materials to distinguish them from classified documents.

Legal correspondence (discovery letter)
2025-12-25

EFTA00027072.pdf

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated October 20, 2020, serving as a cover letter for a discovery production. The production includes various materials such as FBI documents from Florida and NY, PBPD materials, and videos, listed with Bates numbers. The letter also addresses the status of data extracted from electronic devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties, noting that privilege reviews are ongoing and that the Epstein Estate has not waived privilege.

Legal correspondence / discovery production letter
2025-12-25

EFTA00026926.pdf

This document is an email chain from April 2021 between defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and redacted government officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement. Sternheim requests that Maxwell be allowed legal materials while waiting in the cell block, noting she was held idle for over three hours. The government responds that they do not object but that the US Marshals require a court order.

Email correspondence / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00026819.pdf

This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 8, 2020. The government asserts it has met its discovery obligations despite technical issues at the MDC, detailing efforts to reformat files and provide IT support. The letter also addresses Maxwell's conditions of confinement, confirming she must sleep in an isolation cell and undergo weekly body scans, while noting she has access to commissary food, mail, and 13 hours of discovery review time per day. It mentions the FBI possesses 43,500 images from Epstein's residences (3,500 containing nudity) which will be made available for review via a secure laptop brought to the MDC.

Legal correspondence / government letter
2025-12-25

EFTA00026813.pdf

This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 8, 2020, refuting claims that the government failed to meet discovery obligations. The letter details technical efforts to ensure Maxwell can review digital evidence at the MDC, including the provision of a secure laptop to review 43,500 images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties (3,500 of which contain nudity). It also addresses conditions of confinement, confirming Maxwell remains in an isolation cell for safety, undergoes weekly body scans, and has access to commissary food items.

Legal correspondence (government letter to defense counsel)
2025-12-25

EFTA00026465.pdf

This document contains the signature block and legal disclaimer for Bobbi C. Sternheim, Esq. It includes contact details (partially redacted), a notice regarding office closure due to Covid-19, and standard confidentiality warnings. Bobbi Sternheim is known for representing Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal correspondence / email signature block
2025-12-25

EFTA00026460.pdf

This document represents an email thread between defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim and an official at MDC Brooklyn regarding the confinement status of Ghislaine Maxwell on November 19, 2020. The official informs Sternheim that Maxwell was placed in quarantine (not the SHU) for 14 days after close contact with a staff member who tested positive for COVID-19, resulting in the suspension of in-person legal visits.

Email correspondence / legal communication
2025-12-25

EFTA00026458.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 2020 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim. Sternheim writes to unidentified recipients (likely prison officials) seeking confirmation and explanation regarding Maxwell receiving a Covid-19 nasal swab and being moved to the Special Housing Unit (SHU) for a 14-day quarantine, expressing concern over scheduled legal calls and visits.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00025282.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 2021 detailing complaints by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, regarding conditions at the MDC. Sternheim alleges 'foul play' or a 'cover-up' regarding legal mail that went missing and reappeared with USPS markings despite being placed in an internal mailbox. Additional complaints include inadequate space and COVID safety during legal visits, denial of requests to see the Warden, and issues with food (receiving meat while on a vegetarian diet) and electricity.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00025278.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and Bureau of Prisons officials. Sternheim alleges 'foul play' regarding legal mail that went missing and reappeared with a USPS barcode despite never being mailed externally. She also complains about poor conditions at the MDC, including cramped meeting rooms violating COVID protocols, electricity/water issues, and the prison serving Maxwell a bologna sandwich despite her vegetarian diet.

Email correspondence / legal complaint
2025-12-25

EFTA00025195.pdf

An email chain from February 23, 2021, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca) sending a courtesy copy of a bail application filing to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The email was forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office with the commentary 'Apparently they think third time's the charm,' referring to Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure bail.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00025167.pdf

This document is an email chain dated October 29, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to prison officials (MDC), complaining that Ghislaine Maxwell has not received legal mail in over a week. Sternheim provides four USPS tracking numbers showing legal mail has been 'Available for Pickup' at the Brooklyn post office for days (dating back to Oct 12) without being retrieved by the facility. Sternheim threatens to file an 'order to show cause' requiring the recipients' presence in court if the issue is not resolved immediately.

Email correspondence with attached usps tracking records
2025-12-25
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity