Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Paul A. Engelmayer

Person
Mentions
136
Relationships
8
Events
33
Documents
67
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
8 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial
6
2
View
person Richard M. Berman
Professional
6
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
6
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
5
1
View
person JAY CLAYTON
Professional
5
1
View
person JAY CLAYTON
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization The government
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Redacted Sender
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Court order The court granted the motion for David Oscar Markus to be admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in th... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2025-08-11 Court ruling The Court denied the Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials and directed the Clerk of... New York, New York View
2025-08-07 N/A Order Granting Motion to Withdraw Southern District of New York View
2025-08-06 Legal filing Judge Paul A. Engelmayer issued and filed an order to publicly docket a letter from a victim. United States District Cour... View
2025-08-06 N/A Issuance of Court Order Southern District of New York View
2025-08-06 Legal proceeding A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Men... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2025-08-05 Court order Judge Paul A. Engelmayer issued an order authorizing the Government to file redacted submissions ... New York, New York View
2025-08-05 Legal filing A memo was filed and endorsed regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein an... U.S. District Court for the... View
2025-08-04 Legal proceeding A court order was issued granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohe... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2025-08-01 Legal proceeding A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Co... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2025-07-31 N/A Judge Paul A. Engelmayer signs order regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. New York, New York View
2025-07-31 N/A Filing of Court Order Document 797 SDNY Court View
2025-07-25 Court ruling The Court denied a motion from MSW Media, Inc. to intervene in the case regarding the redaction a... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2025-07-23 N/A Judge Engelmayer issues an order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for access to grand jury tran... Southern District of New York View
2025-07-22 Court order The court granted the motion of David Oscar Markus for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice, allowi... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2025-07-22 N/A Order filed by Judge Engelmayer requiring Memorandum of Law regarding grand jury secrecy Southern District of New York View
2020-04-30 N/A Filing of Opinion & Order dismissing punitive damages claim in Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke. Southern District of New York View
2020-04-30 N/A Entry of Opinion & Order by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Jane Doe 15 case. New York, NY View
2020-04-28 N/A Judge Engelmayer issues Opinion & Order dismissing punitive damages claim in Mary Doe case. New York View
2020-04-28 N/A Opinion & Order entered by Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer in case 19-civ-10758 New York, NY View
2020-03-11 N/A Trial before the Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer Court (likely SDNY based on... View
2020-01-09 N/A Order by Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer staying the case pending potential participation in the Epstein ... New York View
2019-12-30 N/A Order issued by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding deadlines for amended complaints and motions. New York, New York View
2019-12-19 N/A Letter motion filed requesting extension of time New York, NY View
2019-12-19 N/A Order granted by Judge Engelmayer extending deadline to Dec 23, 2019 New York, NY View

DOJ-OGR-00015115.jpg

This document is a letter dated August 5, 2025, addressed to Judges Engelmayer and Berman from an unnamed victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The author expresses frustration with the judicial process, specifically questioning why subpoenas have not been issued for US Virgin Islands officials or Epstein's financial staff (attorney and accountant). The letter explicitly references Leon Black's payments to Epstein and alleges Epstein's accountant removed items from the NY mansion immediately following Epstein's death.

Court filing / letter to judge (victim statement)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015113.jpg

This document is the signature page (page 18 of 27) of a legal filing submitted to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Case 1:20-cr-00330. Attorneys Bradley Edwards, Brittany Henderson, and Paul G. Cassell argue for the protection of victim rights under the CVRA, specifically requesting privacy protections and victim participation regarding the release of grand jury materials. The filing date listed in the header is August 6, 2025.

Legal filing (court submission/letter motion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015112.jpg

This legal document is a filing on behalf of victims in the Epstein/Maxwell case, respectfully requesting the Court to implement specific protective measures before unsealing grand jury materials. The requests include requiring the government to confer with victims' counsel, judicial in-camera review of the materials, and pre-release review by victims' counsel to propose redactions. The filing argues these safeguards are essential to protect the survivors' safety, privacy, and dignity from further trauma, especially given recent events concerning Ms. Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015111.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330) addressed to Judge Paul Engelmayer, dated August 6, 2025. It argues for strict protocols and heightened caution regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials to protect the privacy and safety of Epstein and Maxwell's victims, citing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Rule 6(e). A significant footnote highlights that several victims have already died by suicide or overdose and argues that a potential pardon would cause irreparable harm.

Legal filing / court motion (page 3 of a letter or brief)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015110.jpg

This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330, argues against the unsealing of materials related to the convicted individual, Maxwell. It outlines the victims' concerns, citing Maxwell's recent transfer to a lower-security prison, her access to a public platform through individuals like Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, the government's failure to consult victims, and a growing fear of clemency. The filing asserts that these developments are causing re-traumatization for the survivors and disregard their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015109.jpg

A legal letter dated August 5, 2025, from Edwards Henderson (The Crime Victim Law Firm) addressed to Judge Engelmayer and the SDNY Victim and Witness Coordinator regarding the case USA v Maxwell. The firm represents numerous survivors of Epstein and Maxwell and writes to address the DOJ's request to unseal grand jury materials, urging the court to protect victims' rights under the CVRA (18 U.S.C. § 3771). The document emphasizes the victims' reliance on the justice system and argues that their rights to be protected from the accused must be considered regarding any disclosures.

Legal letter / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015103.jpg

This is a legal letter dated August 5, 2025, from attorney Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to U.S. District Judges Berman and Engelmayer. The letter is written on behalf of victim Annie Farmer regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter heavily criticizes the Department of Justice for failing to pursue further criminal investigations and notes that Maxwell is attempting to negotiate a pardon.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015099.jpg

This is the signature page (labeled Page 2 of 2, though part of a larger PDF marked Page 4 of 27) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It is dated August 6, 2025, and is respectfully submitted to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer by Jay Clayton, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00015099.

Court filing (signature page)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015098.jpg

This document is a letter dated August 6, 2025, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter serves as a cover sheet for five enclosed submissions from various counsel (John Scarola, Sigrid McCawley, Bradley Edwards, and Neil S. Binder). The Government outlines the filing status of each submission, indicating whether it can be filed publicly without redactions, with redactions, or under seal.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015096.jpg

This document is a Court Order filed on August 6, 2025, by District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order publicly dockets five letters submitted by victims and other individuals concerning the Government's request to unseal grand jury materials. The judge notes that the letters have been redacted to protect privacy interests.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015086.jpg

This is a court order from United States District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, dated and filed on August 5, 2025. The order, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, authorizes the Government to file public submissions in a redacted form to protect the privacy interests of victims.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015085.jpg

This is a court order issued by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order grants the Government's request to file supplemental submissions and sets a deadline of August 8, 2025. By this date, the Government must respond to submissions from victims and the defendant, and also clarify whether its motion to unseal grand jury materials includes exhibits in addition to transcripts.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015083.jpg

This is a court order filed on August 5, 2025, by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order provides logistical instructions for victims wishing to submit letters regarding the Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials, setting a deadline for submission to the US Attorney's Office by August 5, 2025. It further instructs the Government to hand-deliver these submissions to the Court by August 6, 2025, in both unredacted (sealed) and redacted (public) formats.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015082.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 4, 2025, is a submission from the U.S. Government to judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The government discusses legal precedents for grand jury secrecy, notes that Epstein's death is a relevant factor, and details its ongoing efforts to notify all victims before the information is released. The filing is submitted by U.S. Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi, Deputy AG Todd Blanche, and U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015081.jpg

This legal document, dated August 4, 2025, is a letter from the Government to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer. It outlines the submission of grand jury materials related to the Epstein and Maxwell cases, including the dates the respective grand juries met. The Government discusses the process of identifying publicly available information from these materials and presents a legal argument that a 'nolle prosequi' in the Epstein case does not prevent the court from disclosing sealed records.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015080.jpg

This is a legal filing (Page 2 of 4) dated August 4, 2025, submitted by the Government to Judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding the unsealing of documents in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The Government addresses Court orders requiring them to identify specific grand jury exhibits and transcripts for public release, noting that trial exhibits are presumptively public. The Government requests an extension until August 8, 2025, to advise the Court on its position regarding the unsealing of grand jury exhibits.

Legal filing / government letter response
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015079.jpg

This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer, dated August 4, 2025. The Government is responding to a court order to provide more information about grand jury materials it has moved to unseal in the criminal cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter outlines the specific information requested by the court, which includes dates of grand jury presentations, exhibits shown, and the government's position on unsealing these materials.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015078.jpg

This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated August 4, 2025, and signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The order officially grants the request of attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of the firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to withdraw from representing Ghislaine Maxwell as her co-counsel in case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015077.jpg

This is a proposed court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 1, 2025, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, to be signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, grants the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to withdraw as co-counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015073.jpg

This document is page 2 of a Court Order filed on July 31, 2025, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer orders the identification of specific information in grand jury transcripts and authorizes the Government to publicly file a redacted letter responding to the order. The document also references the civil litigation case Giuffre v. Maxwell.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015072.jpg

This is a court order filed on July 31, 2025, by District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge is directing the Government to submit a letter by August 4, 2025, clarifying whether their motion to unseal includes grand jury exhibits in addition to transcripts, and to identify specific non-public exhibits proposed for release. The text notes that proposed releases would be redacted to protect victim identities.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015060.jpg

This document is a letter motion filed on July 25, 2025, by National Security Counselors on behalf of MSW Media, Inc. to intervene in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The motion concerns the unsealing of grand jury transcripts, triggered by an instruction from President Trump to Attorney General Pam Bondi. MSW Media seeks to ensure that while victim information is protected, the identities of the Defendant's 'partners in crime or clients' are not redacted under the guise of privacy.

Legal letter / motion to intervene
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015058.jpg

This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer denies a motion to intervene filed by MSW Media, Inc., which sought to address the redaction of grand jury transcripts. While the motion is denied, the judge states the court will consider the views expressed in MSW Media's letter.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015055.jpg

This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 23, 2025 (likely a filing system date or typo, as the case number is 20 Cr. 330). Judge Paul A. Engelmayer denies Maxwell's motion (Dkt. 793) to access grand jury transcripts, which she requested in order to comment on the Government's pending motion to unseal said transcripts. The Judge cites legal precedent establishing the secrecy of grand jury proceedings and rules that Maxwell failed to demonstrate the 'compelling necessity' required to break that secrecy.

Court order / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015054.jpg

This is a legal letter dated July 22, 2025, from defense attorneys David Oscar Markus and Melissa Madrigal to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests permission to review grand jury transcripts that the government is seeking to unseal, noting that they have not previously seen them in their entirety. The letter states that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has no objection to this request.

Legal letter / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
0
Total
1

Order regarding grand jury transcripts and public filing

From: Paul A. Engelmayer
To: the government

Authorization to file a redacted letter and instructions on identifying grand jury transcript information.

Court order
2025-07-31
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search