Paul A. Engelmayer
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JAY CLAYTON
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JAY CLAYTON
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court order | The court granted the motion for David Oscar Markus to be admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-11 | Court ruling | The Court denied the Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials and directed the Clerk of... | New York, New York | View |
| 2025-08-07 | N/A | Order Granting Motion to Withdraw | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal filing | Judge Paul A. Engelmayer issued and filed an order to publicly docket a letter from a victim. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2025-08-06 | N/A | Issuance of Court Order | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal proceeding | A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Men... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-05 | Court order | Judge Paul A. Engelmayer issued an order authorizing the Government to file redacted submissions ... | New York, New York | View |
| 2025-08-05 | Legal filing | A memo was filed and endorsed regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein an... | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2025-08-04 | Legal proceeding | A court order was issued granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohe... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-01 | Legal proceeding | A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Co... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-31 | N/A | Judge Paul A. Engelmayer signs order regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | New York, New York | View |
| 2025-07-31 | N/A | Filing of Court Order Document 797 | SDNY Court | View |
| 2025-07-25 | Court ruling | The Court denied a motion from MSW Media, Inc. to intervene in the case regarding the redaction a... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-23 | N/A | Judge Engelmayer issues an order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for access to grand jury tran... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-07-22 | Court order | The court granted the motion of David Oscar Markus for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice, allowi... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-22 | N/A | Order filed by Judge Engelmayer requiring Memorandum of Law regarding grand jury secrecy | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-04-30 | N/A | Filing of Opinion & Order dismissing punitive damages claim in Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-04-30 | N/A | Entry of Opinion & Order by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Jane Doe 15 case. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Judge Engelmayer issues Opinion & Order dismissing punitive damages claim in Mary Doe case. | New York | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Opinion & Order entered by Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer in case 19-civ-10758 | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-03-11 | N/A | Trial before the Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer | Court (likely SDNY based on... | View |
| 2020-01-09 | N/A | Order by Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer staying the case pending potential participation in the Epstein ... | New York | View |
| 2019-12-30 | N/A | Order issued by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding deadlines for amended complaints and motions. | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-12-19 | N/A | Letter motion filed requesting extension of time | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-12-19 | N/A | Order granted by Judge Engelmayer extending deadline to Dec 23, 2019 | New York, NY | View |
060.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. The letter serves to supplement a pending motion to dismiss by submitting a recent Opinion & Order from Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in a related case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which dismissed punitive damages claims against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein's executors. The defense argues this precedent supports dismissing punitive damages in the current action.
035.pdf
This document is a court filing dated April 28, 2020, submitted by attorneys for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein to Judge Paul Gardephe in the Teresa Helm case. It encloses a newly issued Opinion & Order by Judge Paul Engelmayer in a separate case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which grants the Estate's motion to dismiss claims for punitive damages. The court ruled that under New York law (EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1)) and likely US Virgin Islands common law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor because they serve a penal rather than remedial purpose.
041.pdf
A letter motion filed on March 6, 2020, by Andrew S. Buzin of Buzin Law P.C. requesting permission to withdraw as local counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe 17 in her case against Indyke and Kahn (executors of the Epstein estate). The client requested the discharge, and she remains represented by attorneys from Weisman, Brodie, Starr & Margolies, P.A. and Alan Goldfarb, P.A. The letter notes that the case is currently stayed pending the plaintiff's potential participation in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
037.pdf
Court order from the Southern District of New York dated December 30, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer sets deadlines for the plaintiff to file an amended complaint (by Jan 13, 2020) and for subsequent responses from the defendants. The order establishes a procedural schedule following the defendants' motion to dismiss filed on December 23, 2019.
033.pdf
A letter motion dated December 19, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities, requesting a brief extension to respond to the complaint in Jane Doe 17 v. Indyke et al. The letter lists numerous corporate defendants linked to Epstein, including Nine East 71st Street Corp and Financial Trust Company. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the request on the same day and noted that future requests should be directed to Judge Freeman.
029.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation filed on December 12, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The parties agree to an order protecting the Plaintiff's anonymity, outlining strict protocols for disclosing her identity only to necessary defense counsel and staff, requiring Non-Disclosure Agreements for any other necessary disclosures. It includes the text of the proposed order and a template NDA.
027.pdf
A letter from defense attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense requests the court vacate a recent order granting the plaintiff anonymity, not to oppose the anonymity itself, but to ensure they have the opportunity to respond regarding the specific terms of that anonymity to protect their defense rights, citing a previous deadline of December 21, 2019.
026.pdf
This document is an Order of Reference to a Magistrate Judge filed on November 14, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. (Case 1:19-cv-09610). Judge Paul A. Engelmayer ordered the case to be referred for General Pretrial, which includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement.
025.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated November 8, 2019, signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The order grants the motion of Plaintiff 'Jane Doe 17' to proceed anonymously in her case against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) and various associated corporate entities.
021.pdf
A legal filing from Troutman Sanders LLP on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities in the case Jane Doe 17 v. Indyke et al. The letter informs Judge Engelmayer of an agreement between parties regarding the acceptance of service and an extension of time until December 21, 2019, for the defendants to respond to the complaint. The judge granted and signed the order on November 5, 2019.
016.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York filed on October 25, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and various associated entities. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the motion for attorney David H. Brodie to appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of the plaintiff.
015.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated October 25, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer signed the order granting attorney Alan Goldfarb's motion to appear *pro hac vice* on behalf of the plaintiff.
045.pdf
Defense counsel Bennet Moskowitz submits a letter to the Court in the 'Jane Doe 1000' case, attaching a recent Order from Judge Paul Engelmayer in the 'Jane Doe 15' case. The attached Order dismisses Jane Doe 15's claim for punitive damages against the Epstein Estate, ruling that under both New York and New Mexico law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from a deceased tortfeasor's estate. The Order details allegations that Jane Doe 15 was groomed by Epstein's secretary in New York and subsequently abused by Epstein at his New Mexico ranch in 2004.
040.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated April 30, 2020, filed by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP on behalf of the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn). The letter is addressed to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman in the case of Teala Davies v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It serves to supplement a pending motion to dismiss by submitting a recent Opinion & Order from a related case (Jane Doe 15), in which Judge Paul A. Engelmayer dismissed a similar claim for punitive damages against the executors.
040-01.pdf
Court order issued by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on April 30, 2020, granting the defendants' motion to dismiss Jane Doe 15's claim for punitive damages against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff alleged she was groomed by Epstein's secretary in New York and sexually abused by Epstein at his New Mexico ranch in 2004 at age 15. The court ruled that under both New York and New Mexico law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor.
039.pdf
A letter dated April 28, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra Freeman regarding the case of Teala Davies v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter supplements a pending motion to dismiss by submitting a recent Opinion & Order from Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in a related case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which dismissed punitive damages claims against the Co-Executors.
039-01.pdf
This document is a legal Opinion & Order from the Southern District of New York in the case of Mary Doe v. the Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's Estate. The court granted the executors' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's request for punitive damages. The judge ruled that New York law applies to the case because the torts occurred in New York, and under New York's Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1)), punitive damages cannot be awarded against the personal representatives of an estate.
EFTA00023779.pdf
This document is an automatic email reply dated March 11, 2020, regarding 'Epstein FOIAs'. The sender, an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA), informs the recipient that they are currently occupied with a trial before Judge Paul A. Engelmayer and directs urgent inquiries to other AUSAs.
EFTA00016118.pdf
Attorney Anthony Cecutti writes to Judge Engelmayer regarding his client, Justin Rivera, detailing ongoing issues with accessing discovery materials (via laptop) and legal counsel (via video calls) at the MCC. The letter alleges harassment by MCC staff, who referred to Rivera as 'enemy #1', and criticizes the facility's rigid scheduling. The document concludes by contrasting Rivera's harsh treatment with the extensive accommodations provided to Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC (access to computers, showers, TV, and 13 hours of discovery review daily), arguing that the disparity is based on race, gender, and class.
DOJ-OGR-00015133.jpg
This is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated August 11, 2025, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer denies the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts from Maxwell's case. The document provides background, referencing Maxwell's December 2021 conviction for sexual abuse committed with Jeffrey Epstein and the 2019 indictment and arrest of Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00015132.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing dated August 8, 2025, from the US Department of Justice to Judges Berman and Engelmayer. The document confirms the Government is submitting Epstein grand jury transcripts under seal to Judge Berman, identifying which parts are publicly available, following a similar procedure used for Ghislaine Maxwell's transcripts submitted four days prior. The filing is signed by US Attorney General Pamela Bondi, Deputy AG Todd Blanche, and US Attorney for SDNY Jay Clayton.
DOJ-OGR-00015130.jpg
Court order from the Southern District of New York (Case 20-CR-330) signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The order grants the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Menninger of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. to withdraw as co-counsel for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is dated August 7, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00015127.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 6, 2025. The order publicly dockets an additional letter submitted on behalf of a victim regarding the government's request to unseal Maxwell's grand jury materials. The Court notes that no redactions are needed to protect victim privacy interests.
DOJ-OGR-00015126.jpg
This document is a proposed court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 6, 2025, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, to be signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, grants the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Menninger of the law firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. to withdraw as co-counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00015118.jpg
This is a legal letter from Neil S. Binder of Binder & Schwartz LLP to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding the case United States v. Maxwell. The letter, submitted under seal, addresses the DOJ's motion to unseal grand jury materials that reference the firm's client (whose name is redacted), arguing for the continued maintenance of grand jury secrecy based on established precedent and the lack of justification for special circumstances.
Order regarding grand jury transcripts and public filing
Authorization to file a redacted letter and instructions on identifying grand jury transcript information.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity