United States Government
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Advisory policy recommendation |
7
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1954-01-01 | N/A | The U.S. Virgin Islands Organic Act was passed, officially granting territorial status to St. Tho... | US Virgin Islands | View |
| 1927-01-01 | N/A | U.S. citizenship was granted to the residents of St. Thomas. | St. Thomas | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020049.jpg
A legal filing arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell is not a flight risk to France because French authorities would likely extradite her back to the U.S. expeditiously. It cites an opinion by Mr. Julié regarding French extradition law and notes that Maxwell has waived her extradition rights. A footnote reveals that French authorities have broadened their criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein to include Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00020045.jpg
This document is page 25 of a defense filing arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that Maxwell was not evading arrest but rather avoiding the press, evidenced by the government's ability to easily track her phone. It further argues she is not a flight risk to the UK or France, noting she waived extradition rights and remained in the US following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and death.
DOJ-OGR-00005580.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated October 29, 2021, argues that the jury should not consider the adequacy or methods of the government's investigation when determining a defendant's guilt. Citing multiple legal precedents, the author contends that details about investigations, including the one involving Jeffrey Epstein, are irrelevant to the case at hand. The document refutes the defense's position that they should be allowed to challenge the thoroughness of the government's investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00005579.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the prosecution ("the Government") in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The Government argues that the Court should prevent the defense from discussing certain issues or offering related evidence during its opening statement and the trial, claiming such evidence is irrelevant, inadmissible, and prejudicial. The filing cites several legal precedents to support the Court's authority to limit the defense's presentation to ensure a fair trial and avoid a mistrial.
DOJ-OGR-00005505.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the defense in the case against Ms. Maxwell, arguing against the government's motion to preclude evidence related to its motives for prosecution. The defense asserts its right to present evidence about the timing of the charges against Maxwell in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 death, not to claim 'vindictive prosecution,' but to challenge the thoroughness and reliability of the government's investigation. The defense argues that the government's motion is an overreach and an attempt to force the disclosure of their trial strategy.
DOJ-OGR-00005402.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated October 29, 2021, arguing for the use of pseudonyms for testifying victims. It cites several legal precedents from the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, including the cases of Raniere, Martinez, Schulte, and Hernandez, to support the argument that protecting victims from harassment, embarrassment, and encouraging testimony outweighs defense interests, particularly in sensitive cases like sex trafficking and national security.
DOJ-OGR-00005372.jpg
This document is page 15 of a court filing from October 22, 2021, which lists proposed questions for potential jurors in a criminal case. A comment from the defense argues that juror background questions should be handled through a written questionnaire rather than live questioning (voir dire). The defense supports this by citing precedent from high-profile cases involving Elizabeth Holmes, Robert Kelly, and Keith Rainier, and notes that a verdict in another case was overturned due to jury deceit, highlighting the need for thorough vetting.
DOJ-OGR-00005326.jpg
This document is page 4 of a proposed juror questionnaire filed in a federal criminal case on October 22, 2021. It contains standard background questions for potential jurors, along with comments reflecting a legal dispute between the defendant and the government. The defense argues for including these detailed questions in the written questionnaire, citing precedent from other high-profile cases, while the government objects, arguing the questions are inappropriate for a written form and are better suited for oral voir dire.
DOJ-OGR-00025273.jpg
This is a U.S. Government memorandum from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, dated July 30, 2019. The document shows the Unit Discipline Committee (UDC) referring the case of inmate Jeffrey Edward Epstein (Reg. No. 76318-054) to the Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO). An attached checklist outlines various points for the DHO to determine, including Epstein's GED status, good conduct time, and any history of repetitive misconduct or available sanctions.
DOJ-OGR-00020336.jpg
This page is from a legal appeal filed on May 17, 2021, arguing for the temporary release of Ghislaine Maxwell on bond. The defense claims her constitutional rights are being violated by 'squalid' pretrial detention conditions, including sleep deprivation (lights every 15 minutes), intrusive searches, and isolation, which prevent her from effectively preparing for trial. The document references a plea by Judge McMahon and cites a separate case (US v. Tiffany Days) as precedent or context.
DOJ-OGR-00005718.jpg
This document is Page 6 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing against the admissibility of a specific document compilation. The text details how former Epstein employee Alfredo Rodriguez attempted to sell 97 pages of evidence to lawyer Brad Edwards in 2009, leading to an FBI sting operation where Rodriguez sold the documents to an undercover officer for $50,000. The filing argues these documents are unauthenticated hearsay, lack relevance to the current indictment, and should be excluded.
DOJ-OGR-00002785.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 171) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 23, 2021. The defense argues that Maxwell is not a flight risk because she is willing to renounce both her French and British citizenships and waive extradition rights. The text cites a legal opinion by Mr. Julié regarding French extradition law (Article 696-4) to support the claim that she would not be protected from extradition if she fled to France after renouncing citizenship.
DOJ-OGR-00025355.jpg
This document is a United States Government Memorandum from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, dated July 30, 2019. It serves as a DHO (Discipline Hearing Officer) Checklist for inmate Jeffrey Edward Epstein (Reg. No. 76318-054), indicating his case is being referred by the Unit Discipline Committee (UDC) to the DHO. The document lists various forms and determinations attached to the referral, such as GED status, conduct credits, and disciplinary history.
DOJ-OGR-00011555.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 22, 2022. The Judge is issuing a ruling regarding objections to the Pre-Sentence Report (PSR), specifically noting the defense's argument to use 2003 sentencing guidelines versus 2004 guidelines. The text explicitly mentions that the government's sole objection to the guideline calculation is that Virginia Roberts and Melissa should be formally considered victims.
DOJ-OGR-00005754.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing, dated October 18, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The author argues that the Court should prohibit any law enforcement witness from giving expert opinion testimony because the officers were not properly disclosed as experts under Rule 16(1)(G), and such testimony would violate Rule 702. The argument extends to witnesses called by either the government or the defendant, Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005750.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 393) dated October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It is a motion filed by the defense to preclude law enforcement witnesses from providing expert opinion testimony, arguing that the government should be limited to its two disclosed experts, Dr. Lisa Rocchio and Steven Flately. The motion cites case law (United States v. Mejia) to argue against 'skilled witnesses' who act as both fact and expert witnesses.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019653.jpg
This document appears to be page 165 from a book (likely by Edward Jay Epstein given the filename, though the content is about Edward Snowden) stamped with House Oversight markings. It details the geopolitical maneuvering surrounding Edward Snowden's flight from Hong Kong to Moscow on June 23 via Aeroflot, arranged by Sarah Harrison. The text discusses the leverage Russian officials held over Snowden, his lack of travel documents, and the 'special operation' used to detain him upon arrival in Russia, preventing him from traveling to other nations like Cuba or Ecuador.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019614.jpg
This document is page 126 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (indicated by the subject matter and ISBN in the footer), likely authored by Edward Jay Epstein (unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein, though included in this document set). The text details the negative assessments of Edward Snowden's data theft by high-ranking US officials including Admiral Michael Rogers, General Martin Dempsey, and Lt. General Mike Flynn. The officials argue that the majority of files stolen were military secrets unrelated to domestic surveillance and caused significant damage to national security.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019592.jpg
This document appears to be page 104 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets,' processed as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. The text details the logistics and deception involved in Edward Snowden's escape from Hong Kong to Moscow, highlighting his financial limitations (blocked credit cards), legal threats (Interpol red alerts), and the involvement of WikiLeaks figures Julian Assange and Sarah Harrison in orchestrating his movement while he used local lawyers like Tibbo as cover. The text does not mention Jeffrey Epstein, though the file metadata includes 'Epst' and 'House Oversight'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019585.jpg
This document appears to be page 97 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the filename 'Epst' and ISBN). It details Edward Snowden's admission to journalist Lam that he joined Booz Allen Hamilton specifically to access NSA hacking lists. It discusses the timeline of his interviews in Hong Kong, his departure to Russia, and the surveillance suspected by journalist Laura Poitras. While the author is named Epstein, the content concerns Edward Snowden, not Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019295.jpg
This page from a Freedom House report outlines recommendations for human rights organizations and democratic governments to combat modern authoritarianism. It calls for renewed focus on political prisoners, the use of sanctions like the Global Magnitsky Act, resistance against Chinese censorship globally, and support for threatened democracies like Ukraine.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031944.jpg
This document is page 4 of a report or article stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031944'. It details US diplomatic relations with Egypt following the Mubarak era, specifically highlighting the Obama administration's decision to engage with the Muslim Brotherhood and its political wing, the Freedom and Justice Party. The text mentions an annual $1.3 billion aid package to the Egyptian military and describes a meeting between Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Jacob Walles and Brotherhood leaders in Cairo ahead of parliamentary elections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031943.jpg
This page, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031943, appears to be part of a report or news clipping discussing US-Egypt relations following the ouster of Hosni Mubarak. It focuses on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's criticism of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) for delaying elections until 2013 and attempting to retain political power. It highlights the tension between the Obama administration's desire to promote democracy and its strategic interests in the region.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031889.jpg
This page is an excerpt from a political analysis or essay (possibly an attachment in a larger correspondence) discussing the inherent 'revolutionary' nature of American society and its impact on foreign policy. It argues that cultural and economic forces (like the Internet, NGOs, and businesses) undermine conservative regimes in places like Saudi Arabia, Russia, and China, regardless of official government policy. The document bears a House Oversight footer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031854.jpg
This document appears to be page 21 of a larger file, containing the conclusion of an article or book review written by Ferguson (likely Niall Ferguson) about Henry Kissinger. The text analyzes US-China relations, contrasting the views of nationalist Chinese writers like Liu Mingfu with Kissinger's hope for a 'Pacific Community.' It includes a significant quote from Richard Nixon predicting China's rise to global leadership. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity