District of New Jersey
LocationRelationship Network
014.pdf
This document is the transcript of the arraignment for Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, the two prison guards charged in connection with falsifying records related to Jeffrey Epstein's detention. The hearing took place on November 19, 2019, before Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn in the Southern District of New York. Both defendants pleaded not guilty and were released on $100,000 bond with travel restrictions. A significant portion of the hearing involved a debate over whether Noel should be required to surrender her personal firearm; the judge ruled she must surrender it for the safety of pretrial services officers.
008.pdf
This document is an Appearance Bond and Order Setting Conditions of Release for Michael Thomas, a defendant in Case 19 CR 830 (AT), filed on November 11, 2019. Thomas was released on a $100,000 personal recognizance bond co-signed by sureties Alec Thomas and Qadriyyah Hill-Lora. Conditions of release include travel restrictions to NY/NJ, surrender of passport, prohibition of firearms and excessive alcohol, and a specific order to have no contact with his co-defendant unless counsel is present.
007.pdf
Bail disposition form for Michael Thomas, a correctional officer charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death. Thomas pleaded not guilty on November 19, 2019, and was released on a $100,000 Personal Recognizance Bond with travel restrictions limited to NY/NJ. Specific handwritten conditions prohibit excessive alcohol use and contact with his co-defendant (Tova Noel) without counsel present.
006.pdf
This document is a Bail Disposition form from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) for defendant Tova Noel, dated November 19, 2019. Noel, represented by James E. Foy, voluntarily surrendered, pled not guilty, and was released on a $100,000 Personal Recognizance Bond signed by two financially responsible persons. Conditions of release include travel restrictions to NY/NJ/PA, surrender of travel documents, pretrial supervision, mental health evaluation, and a specific prohibition on contacting her co-defendant without counsel present.
DOJ-OGR-00014860.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on December 2, 2024. It argues that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was limited solely to the Southern District of Florida and does not prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting Ghislaine Maxwell. The text cites the 'Annabi' precedent to support the conclusion that the agreement does not bind other districts.
DOJ-OGR-00000316.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 9, 2019, argues that a Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein does not prevent the United States from bringing federal criminal charges against him in other districts. It cites legal precedent and the U.S. Attorney's Manual to assert that the original agreement made by the USAO-SDFL was not binding on other jurisdictions like the Southern District of New York or the District of New Jersey. The document also addresses the rights of petitioners (victims) under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), stating they have not been denied the ability to confer with the government about potential charges against Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000280.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 11, 2019, details the legal proceedings and agreements surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses the jurisdictional complexities of his alleged crimes, the government's efforts to prosecute him despite a nonprosecution agreement (NPA) entered into with the USAO-SDFL in 2007, and the defense's arguments against the notion of flight risk, citing Epstein's history of international travel with returns to the U.S. and his intent to contest charges.
DOJ-OGR-00000011.jpg
This page from a legal filing (likely an appellate opinion) rejects Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) prevents her prosecution in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The court cites *United States v. Annabi* to conclude that the NPA was expressly limited to the Southern District of Florida and did not bind other districts like SDNY. Footnotes discuss legal precedents regarding plea agreements and double jeopardy.
DOJ-OGR-00002164.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 18, 2020. It lists numerous U.S. federal court cases, dating from 1985 to 2019, that are cited as legal precedent in the main document. The cases cover various federal districts and circuits, with a significant number originating from courts in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00021969.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a judge is outlining the pretrial release conditions for two individuals, Mr. Thomas and Ms. Noel. The conditions include specific travel restrictions, a requirement for Mr. Thomas to refrain from excessive alcohol use, and a potential mental health evaluation for Ms. Noel. The judge warns them that violating these conditions will result in an arrest warrant, forfeiture of a $100,000 bond, and a separate charge of bail-jumping.
DOJ-OGR-00021964.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 16, 2019, detailing a hearing about the pretrial release conditions for defendants Thomas and Noel. The conditions discussed include restrictions on alcohol use and mandatory mental health evaluation, as directed by pretrial services. An attorney, Mr. Foy, objects to one of the conditions, stating it was not part of a prior agreement on the terms of release.
DOJ-OGR-00021963.jpg
This is a court transcript from December 16, 2019, detailing a hearing for defendants Thomas and Noel. Defendant Thomas pleads not guilty, after which Mr. Roos outlines the nearly identical bail conditions for both defendants, which include a $100,000 bond and specific travel restrictions within New York and New Jersey.
DOJ-OGR-00021949.jpg
This document is a bail disposition and arraignment sheet for Tova Noel, dated November 19, 2019, related to Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. Noel pled not guilty and was released on a $100,000 personal recognizance bond with travel restrictions and a requirement for mental health evaluation. A specific handwritten condition prohibits her from contacting her co-defendant (implied to be Michael Thomas) unless counsel is present.
DOJ-OGR-00021946.jpg
This document outlines the additional conditions of release for a defendant in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (filed Nov 19, 2019). Conditions include a $100,000 bond co-signed by two people, travel restrictions limited to NY/NJ/PA districts, surrender of travel documents, pretrial supervision (PTS), mental health evaluation, and a strict prohibition on contacting the co-defendant without counsel present. The defendant was to be released on their own signature with remaining conditions to be met by Nov 26, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00021938.jpg
This document is Page 7 of a court filing (Document 8) from Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on November 19, 2019. It outlines the additional conditions of release for a defendant, including a $100,000 personal recognizance bond co-signed by two people, travel restrictions limited to NY and NJ districts, surrender of travel documents, and a prohibition on possessing weapons or contacting a co-defendant without counsel. The defendant was to be released on their own signature with remaining conditions to be met by November 26, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00021934.jpg
This document is the signature page of an Appearance Bond for defendant Michael Thomas in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on November 19, 2019. It contains declarations made under penalty of perjury and is signed by the defendant, a surety named Alec Thomas, and various court officials from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The bond was approved on November 19, 2019, with a final signature from a Deputy Clerk dated December 4, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00021930.jpg
This legal document, filed on November 19, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, outlines the bail conditions for defendant Tova Noel. She was released on a $100,000 personal recognizance bond with several conditions, including travel restrictions, surrender of travel documents, and a specific prohibition against contacting her co-defendant without counsel present. The document also schedules future court dates, including a conference on November 25, 2019, and a preliminary hearing on December 19, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00021887.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (dated December 2, 2024) related to the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). The text argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein was geographically limited to the Southern District of Florida and does not bind the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) or prevent them from prosecuting Maxwell. It cites the legal precedent 'United States v. Annabi' to support the claim that plea agreements do not automatically bind other districts unless affirmatively stated.
DOJ-OGR-00021804.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) made with Epstein does not prevent the prosecution of Maxwell by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY). The document asserts that the NPA's scope was explicitly limited to the Southern District of Florida and did not bind other districts. It cites legal precedents, such as United States v. Annabi, to support the conclusion that Maxwell's prosecution can proceed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity