DOJ-OGR-00021964.jpg
555 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
4
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
555 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from December 16, 2019, detailing a hearing about the pretrial release conditions for defendants Thomas and Noel. The conditions discussed include restrictions on alcohol use and mandatory mental health evaluation, as directed by pretrial services. An attorney, Mr. Foy, objects to one of the conditions, stating it was not part of a prior agreement on the terms of release.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas | Defendant |
Mentioned in relation to pretrial condition number 4, relating to use of alcohol.
|
| Noel | Defendant |
Mentioned in relation to pretrial condition number 7, relating to mental health evaluation and treatment.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, asking questions and making rulings. Referred to as 'your Honor'.
|
| MR. ROOS | Unknown, likely an attorney |
Speaks in court, suggesting a week is appropriate for the two cosigners.
|
| MR. FIGGINS | Unknown, likely an attorney |
Speaks in court, stating he has no objection from the defendants.
|
| MR. FOY | Unknown, likely an attorney |
Speaks in court, stating he has one objection to a condition of release.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| pretrial services | government agency |
Mentioned as directing mental health treatment for Defendant Noel and being involved in the release process.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-12-16
A court hearing to discuss the pretrial release conditions for Defendant Thomas and Defendant Noel. The discussion covers specific conditions from pretrial reports and an attorney, Mr. Foy, raises an objection to a newly added condition.
Courtroom
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as part of the Eastern District of New York.
|
|
|
Listed at the beginning of the document.
|
|
|
Listed at the beginning of the document.
|
|
|
Listed at the beginning of the document.
|
Relationships (2)
Both are referred to as 'Defendant' in the same proceeding and their release conditions are being discussed together.
Key Quotes (3)
"A week is appropriate, your Honor, for the two cosigners."Source
— MR. ROOS
(Responding to the court's question about how long the parties need to satisfy the balance of the conditions.)
DOJ-OGR-00021964.jpg
Quote #1
"Before today's proceedings, we did have an agreement on the terms of release."Source
— MR. FOY
(Providing background before stating his objection to a condition of release.)
DOJ-OGR-00021964.jpg
Quote #2
"But there's one condition I'm not fine with and I'd like your Honor to consider."Source
— MR. FOY
(Informing the court of his objection to a specific pretrial release condition that was added to a prior agreement.)
DOJ-OGR-00021964.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,286 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 14 Filed 12/16/19 Page 6 of 12
JBJKNOEN
JBJKNOEN
of New York, Eastern District of New York, District of New
Jersey, and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
And then the special conditions that are set forth in
the pretrial reports, it's condition number 4, relating to use
of alcohol for Defendant Thomas, and condition 7 for Defendant
Noel, which relates to mental health evaluation and treatment
as directed by pretrial services.
And, finally, your Honor, that they be both released
today on their own signature.
THE COURT: And how long do the parties propose to
satisfy the balance of the conditions?
MR. ROOS: A week is appropriate, your Honor, for the
two cosigners.
THE COURT: Any objection from defendants?
MR. FIGGINS: No, your Honor.
MR. FOY: There is one.
THE COURT: Okay.
MR. FOY: Before today's proceedings, we did have an
agreement on the terms of release. And, of course, as part of
that process, pretrial services is involved and they're not
necessarily privy to the terms of our agreement. And I
understand that we've added some things that were not part of
the agreement, and I'm fine with that. But there's one
condition I'm not fine with and I'd like your Honor to
consider.
Jersey, and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
And then the special conditions that are set forth in
the pretrial reports, it's condition number 4, relating to use
of alcohol for Defendant Thomas, and condition 7 for Defendant
Noel, which relates to mental health evaluation and treatment
as directed by pretrial services.
And, finally, your Honor, that they be both released
today on their own signature.
THE COURT: And how long do the parties propose to
satisfy the balance of the conditions?
MR. ROOS: A week is appropriate, your Honor, for the
two cosigners.
THE COURT: Any objection from defendants?
MR. FIGGINS: No, your Honor.
MR. FOY: There is one.
THE COURT: Okay.
MR. FOY: Before today's proceedings, we did have an
agreement on the terms of release. And, of course, as part of
that process, pretrial services is involved and they're not
necessarily privy to the terms of our agreement. And I
understand that we've added some things that were not part of
the agreement, and I'm fine with that. But there's one
condition I'm not fine with and I'd like your Honor to
consider.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021964
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document