Kenneth W. Starr
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Joe D. Whitley
|
Co counsel |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Mark Filip
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
John Roth
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Sloman
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Article published in print | New York Times | View |
| 2008-05-27 | N/A | Fax transmission from Kenneth Starr to Mark Filip confirmed as 'TRANSMISSION OK'. | Los Angeles to Washington D... | View |
| 2008-05-19 | N/A | Submission of legal letter requesting cessation of federal investigation. | N/A | View |
| 2008-05-19 | N/A | Submission of legal letter requesting meeting and cessation of federal investigation. | N/A | View |
| 2008-05-19 | N/A | Submission of initial request for review to Deputy AG Filip. | Washington, DC | View |
| 2008-05-19 | N/A | Fax transmission successfully completed (TX Report #1855) | Los Angeles, CA to Washingt... | View |
| 2008-05-16 | N/A | Receipt of letter from CEOS regarding limited review | N/A | View |
EFTA00013989.pdf
This document is a letter from Kenneth Starr to a high-ranking DOJ official arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Starr alleges significant prosecutorial misconduct, including violations of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), leaks to the New York Times, and conflicts of interest within the US Attorney's Office. He claims the prosecution is politically motivated by Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton and requests a 'de novo' independent review of the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019232.jpg
A fax transmission report and cover sheet dated May 19, 2008, sent by Kenneth W. Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Honorable Mark Filip at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (DOJ). The transmission consisted of 9 pages and was successfully sent. The document is marked with the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019232.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019231.jpg
This is the final page (page 8) of a letter dated May 19, 2008, sent by attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley to the Honorable Mark Filip. The attorneys are requesting that the Department of Justice discontinue federal involvement in the case (implied to be Epstein's) to allow the State to handle it, arguing issues of federalism and prosecutorial selectivity. They also request a meeting with Filip to discuss these matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019224.jpg
Attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley write to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip requesting a review of federal involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein case, which they characterize as a 'quintessentially state matter.' They criticize a previous 'limited' review conducted by CEOS at the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, alleging it ignored professional misconduct by federal prosecutors and failed to assess the Deferred Prosecution Agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019223.jpg
This document is a fax transmission report and cover sheet dated May 27, 2008. It confirms the successful transmission of a 3-page document from Kenneth W. Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Honorable Mark Filip at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (DOJ). The document contains standard legal confidentiality warnings and bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019223.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019222.jpg
This document is page 2 of a letter from attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley to Mark Filip, dated May 27, 2008, advocating for Jeffrey Epstein. The attorneys argue that the prosecution is politically motivated due to Epstein's association with Bill Clinton and complain about arbitrary deadlines imposed by Mr. Sloman and the USAO. They request a tolling of the July 8, 2008 deadline and an independent review of the case, claiming Epstein is being forced to demand a more severe punishment than the State Attorney deemed appropriate.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019221.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated May 27, 2008, from Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, supplementing a request for an independent review of the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter argues that the prosecution is an unprecedented extension of federal law against a figure with 'close ties to former President Clinton' and complains that Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman imposed an arbitrary June 2 deadline to force compliance with a Non-Prosecution Agreement, thereby attempting to bypass the requested review. The lawyers also allege misconduct, including leaks to the New York Times and conflicts of interest involving Sloman's former law partner filing civil suits against Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018021.jpg
This document is a court exhibit containing a printout of a New York Times 'Letter to the Editor' published on March 5, 2019, written by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (including Ken Starr). The attorneys argue that the number of women involved in the investigation was exaggerated, deny the existence of an international sex-trafficking operation or sex parties at his home, and assert that Epstein is entitled to 'finality' regarding his plea deal. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012134.jpg
This document is a letter dated June 19, 2008, from Kenneth W. Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, Esq. Starr argues that federal prosecutors (USAO/SDFL) improperly interfered in Epstein's state sentencing negotiations by insisting on a harsher sentence (18 months prison + 1 year house arrest) despite claims by Mr. Sloman that they would defer to the State. Starr alleges a 'critical appearance of impropriety' regarding the federal motivation for prosecuting Epstein and requests an oral presentation to review the matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025360.jpg
This is page 8 (the signature page) of a legal letter dated May 19, 2008, addressed to Mark Filip. Attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley request that the recipient review the case and discontinue federal involvement, arguing that the matter should be closed by the State and that current federal attempts involve an overreach of statutes. They request a meeting to discuss these issues of federalism and selectivity. The letter mentions U.S. Attorney Acosta.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025353.jpg
This document is a confidential letter dated May 19, 2008, from attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip. The attorneys represent Jeffrey Epstein and are requesting a review of federal involvement in his case, characterizing it as a 'quintessentially state matter.' They argue that a recent review by CEOS was insufficient because it ignored allegations of professional misconduct by federal prosecutors in the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office and failed to assess the Deferred Prosecution Agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025706.jpg
This document is a fax transmission report and cover sheet dated May 27, 2008. It indicates that Kenneth W. Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP sent a 3-page fax to the Honorable Mark Filip at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, United States Department of Justice. The transmission was successful.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025705.jpg
A legal letter dated May 27, 2008, from Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley to Mark Filip regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The attorneys argue that the prosecution appears politically motivated due to Epstein's friendship with Bill Clinton and claim the USAO would not prosecute a standard 'John' in this manner. They request a review of the case and the tolling of an 'arbitrary' deadline set by prosecutor Mr. Sloman.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025704.jpg
In this confidential letter dated May 27, 2008, attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley urge Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip to intervene in the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. They allege that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami, specifically Jeffrey Sloman, imposed an arbitrary deadline for a Non-Prosecution Agreement to prevent an independent DOJ review. The letter highlights Epstein's 'close ties' to former President Clinton and alleges misconduct by the USAO, including leaks to the New York Times and conflicts of interest involving Sloman's former law partner.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021787.jpg
This document details the legal proceedings and lifestyle of Jeffrey Epstein, contrasting his opulent life on his private island with his status as a sex offender facing prosecution. It covers the timeline of allegations starting in 2005 involving a minor, the involvement of high-profile defense lawyers like Kenneth Starr and Alan Dershowitz, and the eventual involvement of the U.S. Attorney's office in Miami.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012140.jpg
A legal letter from Kenneth Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to John Roth dated June 19, 2008, regarding Jeffrey Epstein's case. Starr disputes a claim by Mr. Sloman that the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) was willing to defer sentencing length to the State, asserting instead that federal prosecutors insisted on a specific prison term (18 months plus house arrest). Starr argues this created an appearance of impropriety and requests an oral presentation to facilitate Roth's independent review of the matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012136.jpg
A letter from Kenneth Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to John Roth (DOJ) dated June 19, 2008, arguing that federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein is unwarranted. Starr outlines four supplemental submissions being sent to the DOJ, which include allegations of misconduct during the federal investigation, a rebuttal to claims by the Miami USAO, and a letter from a former CEOS attorney. The document indicates an aggressive legal defense strategy aimed at preventing federal charges.
Epstein Prosecution / Review of Matter
Disputing Sloman's account of negotiations; requesting oral presentation for review.
Federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein
Cover letter regarding supplemental submissions arguing against federal prosecution.
Sentencing negotiations and review request
Starr disputes Sloman's characterization of the sentencing negotiations, arguing federal prosecutors improperly interfered in state matters and insisted on harsher sentencing. Requests an oral presentation.
Arguments against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein
Request for de novo review, allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, and arguments regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
Fax Transmittal (Cover Sheet)
Transmission of a 3-page document. The specific content of the attached pages is not visible in this image.
Fax Transmittal
Transmission of a 3-page document (including cover). The specific message body is blank.
Fax Transmittal
9-page fax transmission sent from Kirkland & Ellis to the DOJ Deputy Attorney General. Transmission took 4 minutes and 56 seconds.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity