This document is a court exhibit containing a printout of a New York Times 'Letter to the Editor' published on March 5, 2019, written by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (including Ken Starr). The attorneys argue that the number of women involved in the investigation was exaggerated, deny the existence of an international sex-trafficking operation or sex parties at his home, and assert that Epstein is entitled to 'finality' regarding his plea deal. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject/Defendant |
Subject of the letter; referred to regarding his plea deal, prison time, and allegations.
|
| Kenneth W. Starr | Attorney/Signatory |
Signatory of the letter defending the plea deal.
|
| Martin G. Weinberg | Attorney/Signatory |
Signatory of the letter defending the plea deal.
|
| Jack Goldberger | Attorney/Signatory |
Signatory of the letter defending the plea deal.
|
| Lilly Ann Sanchez | Attorney/Signatory |
Signatory of the letter defending the plea deal.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The New York Times |
Publisher of the opinion piece.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the print edition of the newspaper.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the context of alleged sex parties (denied by authors).
|
"The number of young women involved in the investigation has been vastly exaggerated"Source
"there was no "international sex-trafficking operation""Source
"there was never evidence that Mr. Epstein "hosted sex parties" at his home."Source
"Mr. Epstein has gone to prison and made enormous monetary settlements relying on his negotiated agreement."Source
"He is entitled to finality like every other defendant."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (932 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document