Interlochen
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00017408.jpg
A page from the court transcript of the US v. Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Witness Visoski testifies about traveling to Traverse City, Michigan, in the 1990s and picking up Jeffrey Epstein's luggage from the lobby of the Interlochen School of Music, which he describes as a school for gifted children. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) then moves to read a stipulation (Government Exhibit 1004) into the record without objection from the defense (Mr. Everdell).
DOJ-OGR-00014500.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that flight logs suggest the accuser 'Jane' may have met Epstein and Maxwell in 1996 rather than 1994, noting a specific flight in November 1996 from Palm Beach to New York. The defense attacks Jane's credibility by highlighting a lack of flight records for when she was 14-15 and questioning her testimony regarding a 1997 lawsuit she filed against her school teachers.
DOJ-OGR-00014487.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court summation given by Ms. Menninger, likely the defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that the testimonies of accusers like Carolyn, Jane, and Annie are unreliable because their memories have been manipulated and have changed over time. She suggests this shift is motivated by a desire to hold someone accountable for the deceased Jeffrey Epstein's actions and cites expert testimony from Professor Loftus to support her claim about the nature of memory.
DOJ-OGR-00017448.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The testimony focuses on flight logs showing trips to Interlochen in August and confirms that Epstein owned a cabin there. Visoski mentions a rumor that the cabin was originally bought or built for violinist Itzhak Perlman, or possibly donated to the Interlochen School.
DOJ-OGR-00014540.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney for an associate of Epstein. Menninger argues that Epstein's financial activities, such as paying for employees' children's education and giving away land, were acts of generosity and not for illicit purposes as the prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, suggests. The summation highlights the lack of testimony from key figures like Epstein's accountant, Harry Beller, or bank officials from JPMorgan, urging the jury not to speculate on the purpose of the financial transactions.
DOJ-OGR-00014513.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The attorney attacks the credibility of a witness (likely 'Jane' or Carolyn) by highlighting inconsistencies in her statements to the FBI regarding her housing (Bear Lake Estates), her age when moving to Interlochen, and the timeline of meeting Donald Trump in a green car owned by Epstein. The defense argues the witness fabricated Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement at the suggestion of her personal injury lawyer, Mr. Glassman.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity