Interlochen
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00017632.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' (testifying under a pseudonym) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Attorney Ms. Menninger questions Jane regarding her applications to Interlochen, specifically asking about her knowledge of financial aid and scholarships, and clarifying her age (13 to 17) during the three summers she attended. The Judge interrupts at the end to clarify if a statement made by the attorney was a question.
DOJ-OGR-00019057.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on Rodgers' annual flights to the Interlochen Arts Camp between 1991 and 1998 while employed by Mr. Epstein, and confirms Mr. Epstein had a cabin, referred to as a lodge, at that location.
DOJ-OGR-00019056.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. After a series of questions about aircraft ownership were objected to by Ms. Comey and sustained by the court, the questioning shifts to Mr. Rodgers' familiarity with a place called Interlochen, described as a summer arts camp for musicians and singers.
DOJ-OGR-00018996.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Mr. Rodgers testifies that he recalls one female passenger on Mr. Epstein's planes who he understood attended 'Interlochen'. Ms. Comey then instructs Mr. Rodgers to silently identify the passenger's full name using Government Exhibit 12.
DOJ-OGR-00016040.jpg
A 1993 memorandum from Tim Ambrose at the Interlochen Center for the Arts to Jeffrey Epstein regarding the construction of a 'Scholarship Lodge.' The memo details the selection of an architect (Karen Sargent), estimated costs between $125,000 and $150,000, and a proposed location next to the Frohlich lodge. It serves as a preliminary informational update prior to a potential formal proposal.
DOJ-OGR-00019085.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Rodgers) detailing flight movements involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in August. It establishes that Maxwell was not on a flight from Aspen to Traverse City on the 18th, but rejoined Epstein on a flight from Traverse City to Teterboro on the 20th, accompanied by Dawn DeVitto.
DOJ-OGR-00019079.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on missing entries in Rodgers' personal flight log, specifically a jump from flight 818 to 821, and whether a person named Jane was on these unrecorded flights. Rodgers states he has no information and cannot confirm or deny Jane's presence on those flights.
DOJ-OGR-00019059.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning attorney establishes that Rodgers does not have an independent memory of specific flights to a location called Interlochen. Rodgers confirms that their testimony is based on a 'refreshed recollection' from reviewing flight records and a logbook, rather than a direct memory of each individual flight.
DOJ-OGR-00019058.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning establishes that an unnamed male subject regularly traveled to Interlochen, Michigan, in August to watch performances and that Rodgers flew him there seven times between 1991 and 1997. The testimony confirms the destination, purpose of the trips, and the witness's prior statements to the government on the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00017192.jpg
This document is a legal rebuttal arguing for the credibility of a witness named Jane, asserting that her memory of meeting Maxwell and Epstein and the onset of abuse at age 14 is accurate. It counters defense attempts to discredit her timeline by referencing Interlochen and flight records from 1994 and 1996, which place Jane, Maxwell, Epstein, and the defendant together at key times and locations, including flights to New York. The speaker emphasizes that Jane's memory of the abuse is more significant than minor discrepancies in dating events by public figures' birthdays.
DOJ-OGR-00017161.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Menninger argues that Epstein's spending, including giving land to pilot Larry Visoski and paying employee tuition, appeared generous and educational rather than criminal. She refutes the prosecution's (Ms. Moe) claim that funds were used to buy off sex abuse cases by pointing out that accountant Harry Beller signed the checks and no bank representatives testified to the illicit nature of the funds.
DOJ-OGR-00017123.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The attorney attempts to impeach the credibility of a witness named 'Jane' by highlighting discrepancies in her timeline regarding her age during Mike Wallace's 80th birthday and her financial independence. The text references flight logs, payments for schooling by Epstein, and a photo inscription Jane wrote to Epstein thanking him for 'rocking my world,' while also mentioning alleged flights with Prince Andrew and Mark Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017120.jpg
This document is a page from the summation transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), delivered by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The defense is attacking the credibility of a witness (referred to as 'she') by contrasting her testimony—that she was poor ('didn't have lunch money') and that Epstein paid for her schooling—with documentary evidence from 1995 and 1996. The evidence cited includes Interlochen applications where she denied receiving individual funding and CBP records showing extensive international travel to Italy and Europe.
DOJ-OGR-00017108.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Menninger, likely the defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that the testimonies of accusers, including Carolyn, Jane, and Annie, are unreliable because their memories were manipulated and changed over time. She suggests this was motivated by a desire for financial compensation and to hold someone accountable for the actions of the deceased Jeffrey Epstein, and she cites an expert, Professor Loftus, to challenge the validity of how these memories allegedly formed.
DOJ-OGR-00017042.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the prosecution's closing summation in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It details evidence placing both a victim ('Jane') and Maxwell at Interlochen camp in the summer of 1994, citing flight records showing Epstein and Maxwell traveling to Michigan in August 1994. The prosecutor also references a donation by Epstein for a scholarship lodge and correspondence from Interlochen to Maxwell as proof of her presence.
DOJ-OGR-00013497.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding a series of flights. The testimony confirms a flight from Columbus to Traverse City carried a passenger named Jeffrey plus two others. It also details a subsequent round-trip flight to Cahokia, Illinois, which had no passengers and was for the purpose of aircraft maintenance, specifically an 'N number change' and possibly new carpeting.
DOJ-OGR-00013495.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on discrepancies in Rodgers' personal flight logbook, specifically missing entries between flight 818 and 821. The questioner probes whether a person named Jane could have been on these unrecorded flights, but Rodgers states they have no information to confirm or deny this.
DOJ-OGR-00013475.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning establishes that Rodgers' testimony about the number and timing of flights, including those to Interlochen, is not based on independent memory but on a 'refreshed recollection' from reviewing flight records and logbooks.
DOJ-OGR-00013474.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on establishing that Rodgers flew an unnamed male to Interlochen, Michigan, on seven separate occasions between 1991 and 1997. The trips were typically in August for the purpose of watching end-of-the-year performances.
DOJ-OGR-00013472.jpg
This document is page 194 from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. The testimony initially covers legal liability regarding aircraft ownership, during which prosecutor Ms. Comey successfully objects multiple times. The questioning then shifts to specific flights and the witness's familiarity with Interlochen, described as a summer arts camp for musicians and singers.
DOJ-OGR-00013412.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of Mr. Rodgers by Ms. Comey. The questioning focuses on identifying a specific female passenger on Jeffrey Epstein's planes who is known to have attended Interlochen. The witness confirms the identity of this passenger by referencing Government Exhibit 12 without stating the name aloud.
DOJ-OGR-00013402.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) containing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that on August 20, 1994, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell flew together on 'Flight 574' from Traverse City, Michigan, to Teterboro, New Jersey, along with a third passenger. The witness also mentions visiting the Interlochen Center for the Arts while in Michigan.
DOJ-OGR-00014555.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that the jury should 'hesitate' to convict based on changed stories following the opening of the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, the credibility of witness Mr. Alessi, and the lack of physical evidence such as photographs, phone records, or proof of payments to Interlochen. She highlights the absence of corroborating testimony from the accusers' family members.
DOJ-OGR-00017449.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Visoski. An attorney questions Visoski about Ghislaine Maxwell's presence on flights with Mr. Epstein, using a document to refresh the witness's memory regarding specific flights to Interlochen that Maxwell may not have been on. Visoski confirms Epstein was always on the aircraft but is uncertain about Maxwell's presence on every trip.
DOJ-OGR-00017446.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on the Interlochen Summer Arts Camp in Michigan, establishing it as a camp for young, talented artists. The questioner asks the witness if they were aware that Epstein had attended this camp as a young man, to which the witness replies they were not.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity