Deputy Attorney General
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Associate Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Advisory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Roth
|
Discussed matter with |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Roth discussed the Epstein matter with two senior staff colleagues and the Deputy Attorney General. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-18 | Legal filing | The Deputy Attorney General filed a similar motion to unseal on the docket of Epstein's case. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2025-07-18 | Legal filing | The Deputy Attorney General filed a motion to unseal the grand jury transcripts in the Maxwell case. | Court | View |
| 2010-01-01 | N/A | Office of the Deputy Attorney General convened a Victim of Crimes Working Group. | Department of Justice | View |
| 2008-06-23 | N/A | Deputy Attorney General determines federal prosecution is appropriate; Epstein's appeals end. | DOJ | View |
| 2008-06-23 | N/A | Completion of DOJ review regarding U.S. Attorney's handling of Epstein case | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2008-06-23 | N/A | Office of the Deputy Attorney General informed defense counsel they would not intervene. | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2008-06-03 | N/A | Sloman sent a lengthy letter to the Deputy Attorney General detailing negotiations with Epstein's... | N/A | View |
| 2008-05-27 | Communication | Starr and Whitley sent a second letter to the Deputy Attorney General, arguing the need for revie... | N/A | View |
EFTA00032930.pdf
This document is an email dated April 8, 2021, sent by an Associate U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email circulates excerpts from the 'Epstein OPR report' detailing the Office of Professional Responsibility's framework for analyzing attorney misconduct, as well as sections from the Justice Manual regarding the authority and procedures of the Professional Misconduct Review Unit (PMRU).
EFTA00013867.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2008 involving Jack Goldberger, an Assistant U.S. Attorney, and other legal counsel (Roy and Jay Lefkowitz). The key content is a notification that the Deputy Attorney General determined federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein was appropriate. Epstein was given a deadline of June 30, 2008, to comply with a plea agreement that required him to plead guilty, be sentenced, and surrender for imprisonment.
EFTA00013865.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2008 involving Roy Black, Jack Goldberger, and government officials (including a 'Marie' and references to Jeff Sloman and Jay Lefkowitz). The correspondence forwards a critical notification stating that the Deputy Attorney General determined federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein was appropriate. It sets a strict deadline of June 30, 2008, for Epstein to comply with a plea agreement, enter a guilty plea, and surrender for imprisonment.
DOJ-OGR-00015141.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 11, 2025, details a motion by the Deputy Attorney General to unseal grand jury materials from the Maxwell and Epstein cases. The motion is justified by significant public interest and a directive from the President, following a July 6, 2025, DOJ/FBI memorandum on the Epstein investigation. In response, the court has requested additional information from the government to rule on the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00021433.jpg
This document outlines the internal DOJ communications in June 2008 regarding the finalization of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and the handling of victim notifications. It details how prosecutor Villafaña was instructed by superiors Alex Acosta and Jeff Sloman to avoid direct victim notification, instead delegating that task to PBPD Chief Reiter. The text also confirms that the Deputy Attorney General had deemed federal prosecution appropriate just days before the plea deal deadline.
DOJ-OGR-00021310.jpg
This document details events in late June 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's case, where federal authorities concluded their review and declined to intervene further. Subsequently, federal prosecutor Villafaña discovered the proposed state plea agreement's sentencing terms appeared to violate the federal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by not requiring Epstein to be confined in the county jail, leading her to suspect foul play.
DOJ-OGR-00021203.jpg
This document is an organizational chart for the U.S. Department of Justice, depicting its structure for the period of 2006-2008. It outlines the hierarchy of leadership, starting with the Attorney General, and shows the various divisions, bureaus, and offices that fall under the Deputy Attorney General and Associate Attorney General. The chart provides a comprehensive overview of the department's components and their reporting relationships during that time.
DOJ-OGR-00021201.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing, outlines the structure and function of the U.S. Department of Justice and its key components. It details the mission of the Department, the role of the 94 U.S. Attorney's Offices in prosecuting federal crimes, and the oversight structure involving the Attorney General. The text also highlights specialized units within the Criminal Division, such as the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), and their role in assisting federal prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00021178.jpg
This document outlines the procedural history of Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), detailing his guilty plea to state charges of procuring minors for prostitution and the subsequent sentence of 18 months in jail. It highlights the nine-month delay caused by Epstein's legal team attempting to renegotiate terms with senior DOJ officials, culminating in the Deputy Attorney General's refusal to intervene on June 23, 2008. The text also describes the immediate legal fallout, specifically a July 7, 2008 emergency petition filed by a victim ('Jane Doe') alleging violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act because victims were not consulted about the deal.
DOJ-OGR-00003312.jpg
This document details communications from late June 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement. It begins with a letter from Roth to Epstein's counsel, Starr and Lefkowitz, confirming that federal prosecution is appropriate, and then shifts to prosecutor Villafaña's efforts to enforce the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Villafaña expresses strong suspicion that Epstein's attorneys are misrepresenting the terms of his confinement, telling her he would be in a jail 24/7 while planning for him to be at a less restrictive 'stockade', which she reports to a colleague, Sloman, as a violation of their agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00023279.jpg
This document is page 241 of a DOJ report discussing the legal interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) between 2010 and 2011. It details the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) determination that victim rights do not 'vest' until formal criminal charges are filed, a stance maintained in the 2011 Guidelines revision despite Senator Jon Kyl's argument that this conflicted with the Act's plain language. The text highlights the friction between internal DOJ policy regarding pre-indictment plea negotiations and the legislative intent of the CVRA.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012135.jpg
This document is a cover page for a confidential submission sent to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General regarding J. Epstein. It contains a Bates stamp at the bottom right indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee collection (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012135).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012143.jpg
This document is a page from a legal submission by Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The text asserts that federal statutes are being impermissibly stretched and requests that the case be handled by the State of Florida. In the 'Summary of Facts,' the defense claims Epstein did not personally schedule massages, that sexual activity was limited primarily to self-masturbation, and that underage women systematically lied to Epstein about their age.
History of negotiations with Epstein's counsel, NPA, Epst...
A lengthy letter recounting in detail the history of negotiations with Epstein's counsel culminating in the NPA, and addressing Epstein's claims of professional misconduct. Included prosecution memorandum, proposed charging documents, NPA with addendum, and Acosta's December 19, 2007 letter to Sanchez.
Follow-up request for review
Argued prosecution was politically motivated due to Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton.
Unknown
Referenced prior communication.
Unknown
Referenced prior communication.
Epstein Appeal
Initiated the review process.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity