| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Hearing in United States v. Epstein | SDNY Court | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Court hearing to consider the government's motion to dismiss the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein. | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Conference (Court Hearing) in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490 (RMB)) to ... | United States District Cour... | View |
This document is a transcript of the initial court conference for United States v. Jeffrey Epstein held on July 8, 2019, before Judge Richard M. Berman. Key topics discussed include the scheduling of a bail hearing, the controversy surrounding the 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) which the defense argues bars this prosecution, and the government's stance that the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York. The court also addresses Epstein's sex offender status, the recent search of his Manhattan townhouse, and sets a schedule for bail submissions and the next hearing on July 15, 2019.
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on August 27, 2019, concerning the government's motion to dismiss the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death on August 10, 2019. Judge Richard M. Berman presides over the hearing, emphasizing the importance of transparency and victim involvement despite the defendant's death. The proceedings cover appearances by attorneys for both the government and the defense, and the judge's rationale for holding a public hearing on the matter.
This document is a court transcript from a conference held on July 31, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, presided over by Hon. Richard M. Berman. The purpose of the conference was to discuss the scheduling of the trial, including deadlines for discovery, motions, and the trial date itself. The government proposed a trial in June 2020, while the defense, citing a million pages of discovery and complex legal issues related to a nonprosecution agreement, requested more time, suggesting a preliminary trial date after Labor Day 2020.
This document is a supplemental letter from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel to Judge Richard Berman arguing for bail. The letter attempts to rebut government claims regarding flight risk, offering Epstein's brother Mark (net worth >$100M) as a bond co-signer and proposing a forensic accounting of Epstein's finances by Joel Podgor. It also addresses the expired Austrian passport (claiming it was for protection against hijacking), New Mexico sex offender registration (claiming it wasn't required), and payments to associates (claiming they were employees, not paid-off witnesses).
This legal document is a Notice of Withdrawal filed on September 26, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Gloria Allred and her law firm, Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, are formally withdrawing as legal counsel for one of the anonymous victims, referred to as 'Jane Doe,' whose victim impact statement was read in court during a hearing on August 27, 2019.
Victim impact statement/letter regarding the unsealing of 'Epstein Files', criticizing the government's handling of the case and demanding transparency.
Letter expressing disdain for DOJ handling of Epstein files, requesting transparency while protecting victim identities through redaction review.
Victim expresses concerns about DOJ priorities, the protection of high-profile individuals, questions about Epstein's death, and requests third-party review of documents to protect victim identities.
Bruce A. Green writes to Judge Berman to clarify the record regarding comments made in an August 27, 2019 hearing. He states he has never been counsel for Epstein, but did serve as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in a separate, related defamation case, a role which concluded in June and did not involve representation or advocacy.
Clarification regarding comments made during the August 27, 2019 hearing about Green's involvement in Epstein-related cases.
Bruce A. Green writes to Judge Berman to clarify the record regarding comments made in an August 27, 2019 hearing. He states he has never been counsel for Epstein, but did serve as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in a separate, related defamation case, a role which concluded in June and did not involve representation or advocacy.
Defense response regarding a foreign passport found in Epstein's possession, explaining it was for anti-hijacking safety and never used.
Argument regarding flight risk, citing Epstein's return to the US despite media pressure and public outcry.
Supplemental arguments for bail, addressing wealth presumption, finances, brother's bond offer, NM registration, and passport issues.
Supplement to bail request responding to government arguments regarding detention, finances, flight risk, and registration status.
This document presents arguments to the court regarding Epstein's release, including his brother's offer to secure a bond and clarification on his sex offender registration status in New Mexico.
Supplemental arguments for bail request, addressing flight risk, financials, and passport issues.
A letter from Jeffrey Epstein's attorney to the judge, supplementing a request for bail and arguing against the government's position on detention.
Submission of unredacted police report and details regarding a foreign passport found in Epstein's safe.
Closing statement thanking the court for consideration and offering to provide information at an upcoming appearance.
Supplemental argument regarding Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail.
Arguments regarding payments to witnesses and an expired Austrian passport.
Argument regarding statutory construction of bail laws, constitutional rights, and the treatment of wealthy defendants.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity