Little
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Telethon broadcast | TV camera | View |
| 2010-10-07 | Court case | Little v. U.S., 2010 WL 3942749 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 7, 2010), which interpreted a plea agreement to b... | S.D. Ohio | View |
| 2010-10-07 | Court ruling | The Southern District of Ohio court ruled in Little v. U.S. | S.D. Ohio | View |
EFTA00037903.pdf
This document appears to be a redacted witness statement or questionnaire response detailing severe sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and other men. The witness describes being held in an underground location equipped with stall-like structures, being judged by groups of men, and being raped in the Virgin Islands when she was 17 years old. The text includes graphic descriptions of psychological manipulation and physical assault.
EFTA00032623.pdf
This document is a New York Law360 newsletter email dated November 21, 2018. It summarizes various legal news stories, including a forgery suit against Greenberg Traurig, a doping settlement involving Vijay Singh, and the sentencing of lawyers John Chambers and Michael Little. The document is likely included in the dataset due to a keyword hit for 'Epstein Becker & Green, PC' (a law firm) in the job listings section on the last page; it does not appear to reference Jeffrey Epstein personally.
DOJ-OGR-00021083.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated February 28, 2023, presents a series of case law citations to support the legal argument that a plea agreement made by an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) binds the entire United States government. The cited cases establish that the U.S. government is considered a single entity across all districts, and therefore, an agreement made by one of its attorneys in one location (e.g., West Virginia) is enforceable against federal prosecutors in another (e.g., South Dakota).
DOJ-OGR-00021054.jpg
This document is page 'vi' (Page 7 of 113) of a legal filing dated February 28, 2023, bearing the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00021054. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents referenced in the main brief, including cases such as 'Hudson Valley Black Press v. I.R.S.' and 'Martin v. Hadix'. The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice filing, likely related to a FOIA case or appeal given the OGR marking.
DOJ-OGR-00021016.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (likely a Government brief or Court Opinion) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It discusses the Court's rejection of the Defendant's requests regarding jury instructions, specifically concerning 'travel to New York' and the age of consent laws in New Mexico, the UK, and Florida. The text argues that the Court's instructions were legally sound and that the Defendant's proposals would have confused the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00021841.jpg
This page from a legal filing argues that plea agreements made by any U.S. Attorney are binding on the entire U.S. government across all federal districts. It cites several court cases establishing this principle and the related rule that any ambiguities in such agreements must be interpreted against the government. The document concludes by stating that a case named Annabi contradicts this established legal precedent.
DOJ-OGR-00010399.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing, likely a response or motion, dated April 29, 2022. It defends the Court's decisions regarding jury instructions against objections from the Defendant (Maxwell). The Court rejected the Defendant's requests to limit the charges to specific travel routes (e.g., from Florida to New York) and to instruct the jury on the age of consent laws in New Mexico, the United Kingdom, and Florida, arguing these requests were unnecessary, inaccurate, and would confuse the jury.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015047.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a satirical or critical text (possibly a script, book, or essay) included in House Oversight evidence files. The text critiques government spending priorities, contrasting the cutting of medical research funds with spending on nuclear weapons ('mushroom cloud') that cause the very diseases (leukemia) that charities try to cure via telethons. It bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015047.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity