| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
victim
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-18 | N/A | Trial for another matter involving the government attorney was scheduled to begin. | Unknown Court | View |
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) entered on July 9, 2019. The government argues that the Petitioners (victims) lack standing to void Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) because the government is contractually bound to it, and a favorable ruling would not redress their injury. However, the document notably admits that a federal investigation and potential prosecution of Epstein remains a 'legally viable possibility' regardless of the NPA's status.
This document is page 27 of a court transcript from December 10, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution argues that the defendant poses a significant flight risk because she holds citizenship in France (which does not extradite its citizens) and the UK, owns property abroad, and possesses 'significant and undetermined and undisclosed wealth.' The government expresses concern that she could live indefinitely beyond the reach of US extradition.
Petitioners have the ability to confer with an attorney for the government about a federal criminal case against Epstein.
Requesting 30-day extension and word count allowance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity