| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lilly Ann Sanchez
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor subject |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-03-20 | N/A | Publication of Acosta's letter to the general public. | N/A | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | R. Alexander Acosta served as U.S. Attorney. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | R. Alexander Acosta served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. | Southern District of Florida | View |
This document is a scanned excerpt, labeled Chapter 55, containing a letter written by former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta on March 20, 2011. In the letter, Acosta addresses the public regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case during his tenure (2005-2009), noting the involvement of Palm Beach Police and the State Attorney. He discusses jurisdictional issues, specifically the requirement of an 'interstate nexus' for federal crimes, and mentions Epstein's attorney, Roy.
This document is an excerpt from 'Chapter 55' of a larger work, containing a letter written by former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta on March 20, 2011. In the letter, Acosta addresses the public regarding his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case between 2005 and 2009, noting the involvement of the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney. The text discusses jurisdictional issues (state vs. federal), the hiring of underage females for massages, and mentions Epstein's attorney, Roy (presumably Roy Black). The right side of the page is cut off, obscuring the ends of many sentences.
These pages from the book "Filthy Rich" describe Chief Reiter's frustration with the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, leading him to contact the FBI and federal prosecutor R. Alexander Acosta. The text details Reiter's initial hope in Acosta, Acosta's background working under Ken Starr and clerking for Samuel Alito, and the pushback Reiter received for pursuing the investigation so aggressively.
This document details the Non-Prosecution Agreement signed by Jeffrey Epstein in 2007, which granted immunity to his co-conspirators, including Nadia Marcinkova. It highlights that Marcinkova allegedly participated in sex acts with minors alongside Epstein. Furthermore, the document criticizes the FBI for sending letters to victims in 2008 claiming the investigation was ongoing, despite a plea agreement having already been reached in 2007.
Notification regarding the defendant's guilty plea, the appointment of Robert Josefsberg as attorney representative for victims, and the terms of civil litigation waivers.
Acosta provides background on the Epstein case handling during his tenure, citing limitations due to DOJ guidelines and memory precision.
Acosta provides background on the Epstein case handling during his tenure, citing Justice Department guidelines and memory limitations.
Service of the motion via U.S. Mail and Facsimile.
Notifying attorney that client S.R. is an identified victim under the non-prosecution agreement terms.
Notifying attorney that client C.W. is an identified victim under the non-prosecution agreement terms.
Denial of request for information due to strict rules of grand jury secrecy; suggestion to look for information on the internet.
Regarding Epstein violating agreement to enter plea by Oct 26, 2007.
Regarding Epstein violating agreement to enter plea by Oct 26, 2007.
Discussing selection of attorneys for victims, the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and proposing Judge Davis as a mediator.
Confirming Davis's role as Special Master to select an attorney for victims; outlining terms of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding victim compensation and legal fees.
Informing counsel that the 2-year incarceration term is non-negotiable and setting a deadline for decision by August 17.
Notification of rights under Justice for All Act of 2004.
Instructions on how to submit subpoenaed records to the FBI to avoid personal appearance at the Grand Jury.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity