Lilly Ann Sanchez
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
33
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
R. Alexander Acosta
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Matt Menchel
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
The LS Law Firm
|
Employment ownership |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JACK A. GOLDBERGER
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal representation | Epstein hired Miami criminal defense attorneys Guy Lewis and Lilly Ann Sanchez. | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's lawyers sign a letter disputing a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of a letter by Epstein's legal team refuting sex trafficking offenses | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Letter signed by Epstein's legal team responding to a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Article published in print | New York Times | View |
| 2010-11-29 | N/A | Filing of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-11-23 | N/A | Filing of Certification of Compliance with Rule 7.1(a)(3) | Florida Southern District C... | View |
| 2010-11-22 | N/A | Filing of Reply in Support of Renewed Motion to Quash | Court Docket | View |
| 2010-10-29 | N/A | Epstein's counsel filed motion to quash service. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-01-24 | N/A | Filing of federal lawsuit and subsequent news conference. | Federal Courthouse, West Pa... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Plea deal negotiation. | Unknown (implied Florida) | View |
| 2007-12-19 | N/A | Previous letter from US Attorney to Lilly Ann Sanchez referenced. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signing of an Addendum by Jeffrey Epstein, acknowledging understanding and agreement to comply wi... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signature of the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signing of an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signing of an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement by Jeffrey Epstein and others. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez sign the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution ... | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-29 | Legal agreement signing | Lilly Ann Sanchez, attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, signed the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agree... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Lilly Ann Sanchez signs the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Signing of the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement | Unknown (Legal Office) | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Date associated with the signatures of Jeffrey Epstein's counsel (Lefcourt and Sanchez). | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-09 | N/A | Letter sent rejecting Sanchez's proposal regarding victim claim resolution and proposing a mediat... | Miami, Florida | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Signature of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement by Lilly Ann Sanchez on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement by Epstein's attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez. | Unknown | View |
027.pdf
Legal stipulation filed on December 13, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida, dismissing the case of M.J. vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen with prejudice. The document confirms a settlement was reached, with the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce its terms, and states that each party will bear their own attorney's fees.
025.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on November 29, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team requesting a 10-day extension to respond to two plaintiff motions regarding protective orders and evidence preservation. The motion states that the parties are currently in discussions to resolve the matters and that plaintiff's counsel, Gary Farmer, does not oppose the extension. The document lists M.J. as the plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen as defendants.
023-01.pdf
A legal certification filed on November 23, 2010, in the Florida Southern District Court (Case 9:10-cv-81111). Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez, representing Jeffrey Epstein, certifies that she has conferred with plaintiff's counsel Bradley Edwards regarding a Motion to Strike and various other legal disputes including allegations of a fraudulent affidavit submitted by Epstein.
022.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 23, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:10-CV-81111-WPD). Attorney Bradley J. Edwards requests the court to admit Paul G. Cassell (a member of the Utah Bar) to appear pro hac vice as co-counsel for the plaintiff, identified as M.J., in a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The document documents the payment of a $75 admission fee and lists the defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein from the firm Fowler White Burnett PA.
020.pdf
This document is a Reply in Support of a Motion to Quash Service of Process filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in November 2010. The defense argues that the plaintiff failed to properly serve Epstein because the papers were left with an individual named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York home (9 East 71st St), but the plaintiff failed to prove 'Mark' resided there or was of suitable discretion. The filing also seeks to strike allegations regarding obstruction of justice in prior litigation and opposes sanctions against Epstein.
017-20.pdf
This affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards details difficulties in discovery for a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 10-81111). It alleges that key witnesses Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. Crucially, it lists specific individuals for whom Epstein paid legal fees to prevent them from testifying against him, explicitly labeling Sarah Kellen as a 'procurer of girls' and Nadia Marcinkova as a 'live-in sex slave', while also identifying his personal pilots and household staff.
016.pdf
This document is a Motion for a Protective Order filed by plaintiff M.J. on November 11, 2010, requesting the court bar Jeffrey Epstein from direct or indirect contact. The motion details a pattern of Epstein using private investigators to harass and intimidate victims and witnesses, specifically citing an incident on July 1, 2010, where a PI named Thaddeus Knowles followed 'Jane Doe' and flashed lights into her home. It also references Epstein's intimidation of other witnesses including Sarah Kellen, Leslie Groff, and Alfredo Rodriguez, and his history of violating no-contact orders.
015.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of Process. The plaintiff, M.J., argues that service was properly effected on October 8, 2010, when a private investigator handed the papers to an employee named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York mansion. The filing accuses Epstein and his associate Richard Barnett of fraud and perjury for submitting an affidavit claiming service never occurred, and details a pattern of obstruction by Epstein and his associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel) in similar civil cases.
015-01.pdf
Affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards in Case 10-81111 detailing obstruction tactics by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. The document asserts that Jean Luc Brunel visited Epstein 67 times in jail and that both Brunel and Ghislaine Maxwell evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. It explicitly lists Epstein's inner circle (including pilots and household staff like Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova) and notes that Epstein paid for their legal counsel to control their testimony.
014.pdf
A legal motion filed on November 10, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys requesting the court to quash service of process in the case of M.J. v. Epstein. The defense argues that leaving an unmarked envelope in the mailbox of Epstein's New York vacation home and claiming to leave papers with a non-existent person named 'Mark' violates Federal, New York, and Florida service laws. The document includes arguments citing specific statutes and an affidavit from Richard Barnett denying the presence of anyone named 'Mark' at the residence.
010.pdf
This document is a legal notice filed on November 2, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:10-cv-81111) by the plaintiff, identified as M.J. The filing strikes two previous certificates of service (DE 5 and DE 6) related to a summons and a subpoena for defendant Jeffrey Epstein due to incorrect filing. The document names Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen as defendants and lists contact information for attorneys representing both sides.
007.pdf
This document is a Motion to Quash Service of Process filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on October 29, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's lawyers argue that the plaintiff, 'M.J.', failed to properly serve Epstein with the lawsuit because the documents were merely left in an unmarked envelope in the mailbox of his New York residence (9 East 71st Street) rather than being delivered personally as required by law. The document details the specific dates of the attempted service and cites Florida, New York, and Federal laws to support the argument that the service was legally ineffective.
EFTA00020711.pdf
This document is a 'Second Supplemental Privilege Log' from the case Jane Doe v. United States, listing internal DOJ, FBI, and USAO communications withheld from civil discovery. The log chronicles the timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation from late 2006 to August 2008, detailing the internal deliberations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), plea negotiations, and the drafting of the indictment. It reveals critical details such as internal disagreements over plea terms, Epstein's refusal to plead to anything other than 'assault on the plane,' Jay Lefkowitz's admission that he never intended Epstein to register as a sex offender, and the government's struggles with victim notification and harassment by Epstein's defense team.
EFTA00014046.pdf
This document is the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein, dated September 24, 2007, along with an Addendum dated October 29, 2007. In exchange for pleading guilty to state prostitution charges and serving a recommended 18-month county jail sentence (plus probation), the federal government agreed not to prosecute Epstein for federal crimes. Crucially, the agreement grants immunity to 'potential co-conspirators' (names redacted) and stipulates that the agreement would not be made part of the public record.
EFTA00013855.pdf
A letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis to the US Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida) dated June 19, 2009. The letter seeks to clarify ambiguous provisions within Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically Paragraph 8 regarding waivers of liability and potential civil claims. Lefkowitz argues that the waiver applies to single violations rather than multiple asserted violations and reserves the right to use statute of limitations defenses.
EFTA00013745.pdf
A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez, dated October 9, 2007. Acosta rejects a proposal regarding the resolution of victim claims under the Non-Prosecution Agreement and instead proposes using Judge Davis to select attorneys for the victims and potentially serve as a mediator for out-of-court settlements paid for by Epstein. Acosta also mentions attempting to coordinate with other defense team members Jay Lefkowitz and Guy Lewis.
EFTA00013724.pdf
This document is an editorial clipping criticizing Jeffrey Epstein's high-profile legal team (Dershowitz, Starr, Goldberger) for their defense strategies amidst solicitation charges and civil lawsuits. It details allegations involving a 14-year-old girl in 2005 and notes that police found evidence of school schedules and transcripts in Epstein's home, contradicting claims that he was unaware of the victims' ages. The article mocks the lawyers' attempts to frame the lawsuits as merely money-driven.
EFTA00013689.pdf
This document is an Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It clarifies provisions related to the selection and payment of an independent attorney representative for the victims identified in the agreement. Epstein agrees to pay the customary hourly rates for this representative, but specifies that this obligation ceases if the representative pursues contested litigation (such as lawsuits under 18 U.S.C. s 2255) against him. The document is signed by Epstein and his counsel on October 29, 2007, and by an Assistant U.S. Attorney (signature redacted) on behalf of R. Alexander Acosta on October 30, 2007.
EFTA00013680.pdf
This is the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the United States (represented by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein. In exchange for Epstein pleading guilty to state charges of solicitation of prostitution and serving a 30-month sentence (including jail and community control), the federal government agreed not to prosecute him for federal sex trafficking crimes. Crucially, the agreement also granted immunity to any potential co-conspirators (names redacted) and stipulated that the agreement would not be made part of the public record.
EFTA00013666.pdf
This document is a letter dated July 17, 2008, from the U.S. Department of Justice (Southern District of Florida) to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Michael R. Tein. The U.S. Attorney's Office disputes the defense's claim that the federal criminal action is 'pending,' stating that under the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), the investigation is suspended and motions to quash subpoenas should have been withdrawn. The letter warns that if Epstein claims the federal action is pending to stay civil proceedings, the DOJ will resume the motion to quash and analyze seized computer equipment.
EFTA00013612.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (Alex Acosta and a redacted AUSA). The emails discuss and finalize the text of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. The addendum clarifies the process for appointing an independent third party to select an attorney representative for the victims and stipulates that Epstein will pay the representative's fees but is not obligated to fund contested litigation against himself.
EFTA00013610.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 21, 2007, regarding the finalization of Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez writes to a redacted government official (who is on vacation) urging them to resolve an outstanding issue so they can sign the deal 'as soon as today.' She expresses concern that 'Alex' (likely Alexander Acosta) has not read all defense submissions and notes that the recipient is the only one left in the chain of command capable of resolving the matter.
EFTA00013606.pdf
This is an urgent internal email dated July 3, 2007, likely between federal prosecutors. The sender discusses communications with attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Key points include a request to delay financial subpoenas in exchange for immediate access to computer equipment removed from Epstein's home before a state search warrant was executed. The sender also mentions opening discussions for a resolution to the federal investigation that might include 'concurrent time' (serving federal and state sentences simultaneously).
EFTA00013533.pdf
This document contains a letter from attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez to the US Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida) dated December 7, 2007. It attaches Jeffrey Epstein's signed Affirmation of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and a Notice of Hearing for a plea conference scheduled for January 4, 2008. Notably, Sanchez explicitly requests that the US Attorney's Office delay sending any victim notification letters until further discussion.
EFTA00013499.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted Assistant US Attorney. The correspondence concerns the drafting of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. Key points of negotiation include the selection process for an 'independent third-party' to represent victims and the stipulation that Epstein would pay this representative's fees, but not costs associated with contested litigation against him.
Unknown
Correspondence between Epstein attorney and former US prosecutor not produced in discovery.
Representation of corporations
Referenced in the letter as a source of potential confusion.
Unknown
Correspondence between Epstein attorney and former US prosecutor
Resolution of issues regarding Defendant's Motion to Strike
Counsel conferred in a good faith effort to resolve issues contained within the Defendant's Motion to Strike (D.E. 20).
Delayed entry of plea
Regarding Epstein violating agreement to enter plea by Oct 26, 2007.
Unknown
Acknowledged that language of Paragraph 8 is 'far from simple'.
Delayed entry of plea
Regarding Epstein violating agreement to enter plea by Oct 26, 2007.
Victim Notification
Message requesting the Office hold off on sending victim notification letters.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Cover letter attaching signed Affirmation of NPA and Notice of Hearing; requests holding off on victim notification letters.
Telephone conference (Alternative)
Alternative proposed call time at 5:00 p.m.
Telephone conference
Proposed call at 5:00 p.m. to discuss details.
Jeffrey Epstein
Discussing selection of attorneys for victims, the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and proposing Judge Davis as a mediator.
jeffrey epstein
Sanchez writes to a vacationing official stating she wants to finalize the plea deal, citing one outstanding issue and suggesting a specific person hasn't read defense submissions. She claims they are prepared to sign 'as soon as today'.
jeffrey epstein
Sanchez is urging the recipient (who is on vacation) to finalize the plea deal. She mentions one outstanding issue and concerns that 'Alex' hasn't read defense submissions. She states they are prepared to sign 'as soon as today'.
Plea Offer Deadline
Informing counsel that the 2-year incarceration term is non-negotiable and setting a deadline for decision by August 17.
Extension request
Requesting extension to respond to subpoenas; discussing state resolution.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity