Mr. Willits
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Filer of complaint on behalf of |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a legal complaint | State Court | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Legal filing | A complaint was filed in state court by Mr. Willits on behalf of Carolyn against Jeffrey Epstein ... | state court | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a complaint in state court against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. | State Court | View |
EFTA00014028.pdf
This document contains an email thread from December 29, 2008, between the FBI and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS), and a forwarded email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to several lawyers representing victims (Josefsberg, Edwards, Ezell, etc.). The primary subject is the confidentiality of victim locations regarding Jeffrey Epstein's GPS monitoring 'exclusionary zones.' The Assistant U.S. Attorney confirms, via Captain Sleeth of the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, that victim addresses added to the GPS system will remain confidential and will not be shared with Epstein.
EFTA00014026.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2008 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney and several defense attorneys (Josefsberg, Ezell, Edwards, etc.) regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release conditions. The discussion focuses on the 'exclusionary zones' programmed into Epstein's GPS monitoring system to protect victims. The AUSA confirms, via Captain Sleeth of the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, that while Epstein's GPS will alert if he nears a prohibited location, the specific addresses and identities of the victims will remain confidential and unknown to Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018782.jpg
This document is page 184 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is cross-examining a witness named Carolyn regarding a complaint filed on her behalf by attorney Mr. Willits in 2008 against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) successfully objects to the admission of defense exhibit C4 on the grounds that it is 'not inconsistent,' leading the defense to request a sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00018780.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a previous legal complaint filed on Carolyn's behalf by an attorney named Mr. Willits in state court; specifically, Pagliuca establishes that this 91-page, 209-paragraph complaint did not contain a single mention of Ms. Maxwell's name.
DOJ-OGR-00013197.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a complaint filed on Carolyn's behalf in 2008 against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The proceedings are interrupted when another attorney, Ms. Comey, makes an objection that is subsequently sustained by the judge.
DOJ-OGR-00013195.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a cross-examination. Mr. Pagliuca is questioning a witness, possibly named Carolyn, about a complaint that was 91 pages long with 209 paragraphs and did not mention Ms. Maxwell's name. They also discuss an Exhibit C4 and the filing of the complaint by Mr. Willits in state court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity