THE WITNESS
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of inquiry |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. BILAFONIA
|
Interviewer interviewee |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
AGENT RICHARDS
|
Interviewer interviewee |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Interacted after massage |
10
Very Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Questioner deponent |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Plaintiff defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed woman
|
Payer payee |
10
Very Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Unnamed friend
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Interacted with |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Detective Pagan
|
Gave statement to |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Justin Silk
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Interrogator witness |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed female speaker
|
Switched name tags |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Herman (Plaintiff's Lawyer)
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed counsel
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial questioner deponent |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DETECTIVE RECAREY
|
Law enforcement and witness |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness's boss
|
Employee |
7
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding legal strategy and factual basis for allegations. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Exhibit 2 (a pleading) | Court (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness realized a footnote was missing due to a clerical error and filed a correction. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | An incident where an unnamed male subject ('he') showed the witness photographs of 'young women i... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | An unnamed male subject ('he') took naked photographs of the witness. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. ... | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness recalls an incident where an unnamed male subject showed them photographs of 'young women... | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness testifies that an unnamed male subject took naked pictures of them, which were never reco... | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of an unidentified witness regarding a lawsuit referred to as 'Epstein versus RRA'. Th... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by Mr. Scarola, with Mr. Pike present as coun... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | An incident at a restaurant where Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness, a... | A restaurant | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of the witness by Mr. Tein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition was scheduled to take place, but Mr. Leopold could not start it on time due to a cou... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness met with their attorney, Mr. Leopold, to prepare for the deposition. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness was at a restaurant eating nachos while allegedly evading service of process. | A restaurant (name redacted) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness at a restaurant, allegedly having to... | A restaurant (name redacted) | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness, at age 18, states she would visit 'Jeffrey' and felt comfortable with him. | Undisclosed ('there') | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a lawsuit in federal court against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of the witness. | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | An incident at a restaurant where Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness. T... | Restaurant | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness deleted their MySpace page. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Tein states that Mr. Leopold filed a fifty-milli... | federal court | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or testimony is being conducted, as detailed on page 31 of the transcript. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness lied about her age to Jeffrey Epstein, telling him she was 18. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | An incident at a restaurant where Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness. T... | A restaurant | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021910.jpg
This page describes a deposition where the witness discusses the credibility of attorney David Boies. The witness draws a parallel between Boies' high-profile work representing Al Gore in the 'Bush v. Gore' Supreme Court case and his decision to represent Virginia Roberts. The witness implies that Boies' involvement gave weight or significance to Roberts' case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021878.jpg
Page 55 of a rough draft deposition transcript stamped by House Oversight. Attorney Mr. Simpson questions a witness about what they would have told a judge (specifically Judge Marra). The witness, likely an attorney themselves, objects that the question is speculative and involves attorney-client privilege, but asserts they would have provided an 'ample factual basis for those allegations.' Professor Cassell is mentioned in an objection regarding expert witnesses.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021872.jpg
This document is page 49 of a rough draft deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. Attorney Mr. Simpson questions a witness about whether, as of December 30, 2014, they were aware of any specific person alleging that Alan Dershowitz abused other minors. The witness responds that while they did not have a specific named person at that time, they had a 'pool of persons' they understood would be potentially available to provide such information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021863.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021863). It involves questioning by Mr. Simpson regarding the timeline of a written agreement relative to December 30, 2014, and references a 'motion for joinder' (Exhibit 2) that concerns 'other minors' in addition to Virginia Roberts. The text lists several legal entities involved in Virginia Roberts' representation, including Boies Schiller, Bradley J. Edwards, and the Utah Attorney General's office.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021844.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from the House Oversight Committee investigation (indicated by Bates stamp). A witness, who is a law professor at the University of Utah, explains a clerical error regarding a missing footnote in a legal filing ('Exhibit 2'). The witness clarifies that the Dean of the law school did not order a correction after the fact, but rather had previously suggested using such footnotes, and the omission was a simple word processing or copy-paste error that the witness voluntarily corrected upon discovery.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014309.jpg
This document is page 90 of a deposition transcript related to a lawsuit identified as 'Epstein versus RRA'. An unidentified witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Scarola, asserts their 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment rights when asked about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under 18. The witness objects to a subsequent question about Tommy Mottola, accusing a 'Mr. Edwards' of introducing irrelevant names to damage the witness's personal relationships.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014305.jpg
This document is page 32 of a confidential deposition transcript. An unnamed witness, questioned by Mr. Edwards, testifies about photographs taken by an unnamed male ('he'), confirming he took naked photos of her which were never recovered. The witness also recalls being shown photos of other 'young women in the bathtub' and confirms a prior statement that 'he' had 'lots of pictures of teenage girls'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012474.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Tein, discusses their extensive contact with the Palm Beach Police Department regarding Epstein. The witness states they spoke with police 'more than I like can count' over a four-year period, with the last contact being about a year to a year and a half prior, and confirms remembering Detective Michelle Pagan but not Detective Recarey.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012473.jpg
This document is a transcript from a deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning focuses on a scheduling conflict where the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, was unable to start the deposition that morning due to a court appearance. The witness is also asked if they have listened to a prior tape-recorded statement they gave to the police.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012470.jpg
This document is page 75 of a deposition transcript, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012470'. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about whether their family members (mother and mother's husband, Paul) or another redacted individual have spoken to or received money from reporters, which the witness denies. Mr. Tein then attempts to refresh the witness's memory by mentioning a past event where 'she' was arrested for drugs.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012457.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or testimony where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, likely drove them to a Grand Jury testimony when they were 14 or 15. The witness also admits to lying on their MySpace page about their income, claiming 'as a joke' to have made a quarter-million dollars a year.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012455.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition where a witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies on the witness's MySpace profiles, specifically their stated age (18 vs. 19) and the timing of an age change made just four days before a scheduled Grand Jury testimony. The witness admits to lying about their age to use the platform but claims not to know what the questioner is talking about regarding the suspicious timing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012454.jpg
This document is page 59 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a MySpace page. The witness confirms the page is theirs and admits to having lied about their age, stating they were 18, because of a rule on the platform that required users to be that age to post.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012451.jpg
This document is page 56 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about deleting their MySpace page after receiving a subpoena. The witness confirms the deletion but claims it was a regular habit, not an attempt to hide information. Mr. Tein then accuses the witness of frequently lying about their age, which the witness denies, while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the questions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012450.jpg
This document is page 55 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The questioning covers an altercation at a restaurant involving Mr. Epstein's process servers and the police, as well as the witness's decision to delete their MySpace page just days before the deposition. The witness denies the attorney's allegations about the restaurant incident but confirms the timing of the MySpace deletion.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012449.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript excerpt, likely from September 29, 2004, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about evading service of process from Mr. Epstein's process servers. The witness is accused of having an associate named Justin lie on their behalf and of requiring police intervention to be served at a restaurant. The transcript captures the witness's denials, legal objections by their counsel, Mr. Leopold, and sparring between the two attorneys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446.jpg
This document is page 51 of a legal transcript, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Tein regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to a question, stating it has been asked multiple times and is harassing the witness, while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein defend their line of questioning.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012444.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned by two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on an incident where the witness wore someone else's name tag, which they claim was a coincidence, on the same day they were to be served with a subpoena. The witness denies having prior knowledge that process servers were looking for them.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012441.jpg
This document is page 46 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, aggressively questions a witness named Saige. He accuses her of lying about her name to avoid a subpoena and of lying to get out of the deposition. Saige's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the questions and ultimately instructs her not to answer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012435.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an unidentified witness, a plaintiff in a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein, is being questioned. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to questions regarding financial arrangements with their first lawyer, Jeff Herman, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness repeatedly denies knowing Jeff Sloman, despite being told he is a high-ranking prosecutor and the ex-partner of their lawyer, Jeff Herman.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012432.jpg
This document is page 37 of a legal deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about events following a visit to Jeffrey Epstein's house. The witness denies spending money received there but admits to going to a Marshall's store with two other girls, where one of them bought a purse. The questioning concludes by asking the witness about conversations with federal prosecutors regarding financial reimbursement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012429.jpg
This document is page 34 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a massage she gave to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness states that, contrary to just giving a massage, Epstein also asked her to remove her bra and did touch her. She denies touching Epstein's penis or 'whacking him off,' which she clarifies means masturbating, and is confronted with what appears to be a contradictory prior statement to the police.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012427.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript excerpt where an unnamed witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Tein, admits to intentionally lying to Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms they pretended to be 18 when they were not and also lied about which school they attended. The document contains two redactions, likely obscuring the name of the school, and notes an objection from another attorney, Mr. Leopold.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012426.jpg
This document is page 31 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a prior statement she made to a Detective Pagan, in which she allegedly described lying about her age to Jeffrey Epstein by saying it "really fast." The witness's attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Ms. Belohlavek, repeatedly object to the line of questioning.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012420.jpg
This document is page 25 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about their contact with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the questioning style, noting the presence of a child, while Mr. Tein asks if the witness was persuaded to engage in sexual activity with Epstein for money and about specific methods of communication, which the witness denies.
Questioning about socializing with Alan Dershowitz and To...
Mr. Scarola questions the witness about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of minors, to which the witness pleads the 5th, 6th, and 14th amendments. Scarola then asks about socializing with Tommy Mottola, which the witness calls an irrelevant question brought by Mr. Edwards to harm his relationships.
No Subject
The witness was asked 'Jeff never text messaged you, did he?' and answered 'No.'
No Subject
The deposition from which this transcript is taken, concerning the witness's interactions with Jeff Epstein.
Questioning about socializing with Alan Dershowitz and To...
Mr. Scarola questions the witness about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of minors, to which the witness pleads the 5th, 6th, and 14th amendments. Scarola then asks about socializing with Tommy Mottola, which the witness calls an irrelevant question brought by Mr. Edwards to harm his relationships.
Questioning about associations with Alan Dershowitz and T...
Mr. Scarola questions an unnamed witness about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of minors and with Tommy Mottola. The witness refuses to answer, citing constitutional rights, and complains the questions are irrelevant and intended to harm their personal relationships.
No Subject
The witness was asked 'Jeff never e-mailed you, did he?' and answered 'No.'
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding pictures of teenage girls. The witness confirms the unnamed male took naked photos of them and showed them photos of other young women in a bathtub. Mr. Pagliuca makes objections during the questioning.
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject ('he').
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding 'pictures of teenage girls'. The witness confirms 'he' took naked photos of her and showed her photos of other 'young women in the bathtub'. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the questions.
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject ('he').
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding 'pictures of teenage girls'. The witness confirms 'he' took naked photos of her and showed her photos of other 'young women in the bathtub'. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the questions.
Pro bono work and footnotes
The Dean suggested it might be helpful to include a footnote in filings; discussed support for pro bono work.
Timing of written agreement execution
Questioning regarding whether a written agreement was executed before or after December 30th, 2014.
Legal representation and public record
The witness discusses the credibility of David Boies based on his work in Bush v. Gore and notes his representation of Virginia Roberts.
A trip for students to New Mexico
Jeffrey Epstein called the witness to propose a trip for 20-25 students. The witness asked about accommodations and chaperones, and Epstein stated his 'wife' Ghislaine would chaperone the girls.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition or hearing.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition where a witness is questioned about their past MySpace profile.
No Subject
The witness states she told Jeffrey Epstein she was 18.
No Subject
The witness gave a statement to Detective Pagan about her interaction with Jeffrey Epstein, which is the subject of the deposition questioning.
No Subject
The witness is questioned about sending a message to a friend on MySpace. The questioning attorney implies it contained a racial slur, which the witness denies.
No Subject
The questioner asks if anyone called or e-mailed the witness to induce them to engage in sexual activity with Epstein. The witness denied this.
No Subject
The witness gave a statement to Detective Pagan about the interaction with Epstein, allegedly stating they said their age 'really fast'.
No Subject
The witness told Epstein they were 18.
No Subject
The witness sent a message to a friend on MySpace. The message referred to the ongoing deposition. The questioning attorney, Mr. Tein, implies the message contained the offensive term 'n-i-g-g-e-r', which the witness denies.
No Subject
Mr. Tein asks if 'anyone call or e-mail you to induce you to engage in sexual activity with Epstein?' The witness denies this.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition where Mr. Tein questions the witness.
No Subject
MR. TEIN questions THE WITNESS about an incident involving evading service from Mr. Epstein's process servers, with MR. LEOPOLD representing the witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity