| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Wiles' Wife
|
Spousal confidant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
referees
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Simon Singh
|
Author subject |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Announcement of the solution to Fermat's Last Theorem. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Andrew Wiles finding a proof for a problem unsolvable by computers. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Identification of an error in Wiles' initial proof by a referee. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Andrew Wiles discovers solution to Fermat's Last Theorem. | Unknown | View |
| 2025-12-16 | N/A | Solving of Fermat's theorem by Andrew Wiles. | Earth | View |
| 1996-01-01 | N/A | Andrew Wiles succeeded in finding a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem | Unknown | View |
| 1995-01-01 | N/A | Andrew Wiles solved Fermat's Last Theorem. | Unknown | View |
| 1995-01-01 | N/A | Andrew Wiles announced he had solved Fermat's Last Theorem. | Unknown | View |
| 1995-01-01 | N/A | Andrew Wiles completes the solution to Fermat's Last Theorem. | N/A | View |
This document is a single page (Preface, page xi) from a book, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp (015685). The text is a philosophical discussion by an engineer-author regarding artificial intelligence, consciousness, and free will, referencing works by Roger Penrose, Douglas Hofstadter, and Daniel Dennett. The author argues against determinism and computational theories of mind, citing Andrew Wiles' 1996 proof of Fermat's Last Theorem as evidence of non-algorithmic human creativity.
This document is page 261 of a book or manuscript titled 'Software' (or a chapter titled 'Software'), marked with the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015951, indicating it was part of the evidence produced for the House Oversight Committee's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The text is a philosophical and scientific discussion concerning Artificial Intelligence, arguing that human creativity (citing Roger Penrose and Andrew Wiles) cannot be simulated by machines. It concludes with an introduction to Ray Kurzweil's concept of 'the singularity.' This reflects Epstein's known interest in theoretical science, AI, and transhumanism.
This document appears to be page 259 of a book or manuscript discussing the intersection of music, mathematics, and software. The text explores the concept of 'non-computable' music, referencing classical composers like Bach and Tallis alongside mathematical proofs by Andrew Wiles and Alan Turing. It features a graphic labeled 'Creative Inoculation.' The page bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015949', indicating it was part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to the Epstein inquiry given the prompt context, though the text itself is philosophical/academic.
This document appears to be a single page from a book or scientific essay included in a House Oversight Committee investigation file (likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's scientific interests or funding). The text discusses the computational impossibility of randomly generating complex mathematical proofs (specifically referencing Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem) using the 'infinite monkey' theorem or brute force algorithms, citing the limitations of the Universe's physical constraints (Plank interval).
This document appears to be a page (p. 254) from a book or essay titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', which discusses mathematical philosophy, chaos theory, and the concept of determinism versus free will. It uses mathematician Andrew Wiles and the 'monkeys and typewriters' thought experiment (referencing Shakespeare) to argue against the idea that humans are merely pre-programmed computers. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015944' stamp, indicating it is part of a larger document production for a Congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community, though Epstein is not named on this specific page.
This document appears to be a scanned page (page 253) from a book or academic paper discussing artificial intelligence, mathematics, and computer science. It specifically addresses the 'Special Purpose Objection,' comparing human mathematical discovery (exemplified by Andrew Wiles solving Fermat's Last Theorem) to computer processing (exemplified by Google search). The document bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015943', indicating it was part of a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community, though Epstein is not mentioned on this specific page.
This document appears to be a scanned page (page 252) from a book or article titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'. The text discusses the mathematical work of Andrew Wiles, contrasting human problem solving with computers, and mentions the 'Four Colors' theorem. It carries a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015942' stamp, indicating it was included as part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee, likely within the larger cache of Epstein-related discovery materials, though this specific page contains general academic text rather than case-specific evidence.
This document appears to be a page (251) from a book or scientific article discussing mathematical history, specifically the solvability of Fermat's Last Theorem, Diophantine equations, and the Four Color Conjecture. It details the work of mathematicians like Yuri Matiyasevich, Julia Robinson, and Andrew Wiles, noting Wiles' secret work on Fermat's theorem at Princeton leading up to his 1995 announcement. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger production of documents to Congress, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's connections with the scientific community.
This document is page 248 from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?' and bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015938, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation (likely related to Epstein's connections with academics/scientists). The text details the history of the Robinson-Davis-Matiyasevich theorem, focusing on mathematician Julia Robinson's work at Berkeley in the 1940s and her correspondence with Russian mathematician Yuri Matiyasevich in the 1970s. It also explains basic concepts of logic, including syllogisms and prenex normal form.
This document appears to be a page (p. 247) from a book or scientific paper discussing theoretical computer science and mathematics. It covers Gödel's incompleteness theorem, Turing's proofs regarding algorithms, and the concept of a 'logic limit' in computing. The document is stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015937', indicating it was produced as evidence during a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to Epstein's connections to the scientific community or funding.
This document is page 242 from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', included in a House Oversight document production (Bates stamp 015932). The text discusses the history of Fermat's Last Theorem, its solution by Andrew Wiles in 1995, and the philosophical differences between mathematical proof and computer 'brute force' calculations. It contrasts the rigorous standards of mathematicians with the empirical methods of engineers and physicists.
This document appears to be page 125 from a scientific book or manuscript titled 'The Brain'. It discusses a hypothesis regarding 'tubulin' and 'microtubules' within neurons, specifically speculating that tubulin harvests UV light emitted by mitochondria as waste energy. The text connects this biological process to a 'non-computational mechanism' for human thought and mentions 'mathematical creativity and the Wiles Paradox'. The page contains two diagrams: one of a tubulin structure and another illustrating 'Quantum Coupling of Tubulin in Microtubule'. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015815', indicating it is part of the evidence collected during the House Oversight Committee's investigation, likely reflecting Jeffrey Epstein's interest in and funding of theoretical physics and consciousness research (specifically theories resembling the Orch-OR theory proposed by Penrose and Hameroff).
This document appears to be page 75 of a book manuscript or scientific essay discussing Artificial Intelligence, the Turing Test, and the 'Uncanny Valley.' The author argues that computers cannot replicate human creativity or 'non-computable' thought, citing the solving of Fermat's Last Theorem by Andrew Wiles as an example of human-specific intellect. The page is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015765,' indicating it was collected as evidence during a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community or his personal papers.
This document is page 391 of a bibliography from a larger work, marked with a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (016081), indicating it is part of an investigation production (likely related to Epstein given the prompt context). The bibliography lists academic and non-fiction works organized by chapter, covering topics such as mathematics, artificial intelligence, genetic algorithms, and creativity. The specific works cited suggest the larger document focused on scientific and intellectual topics, consistent with Epstein's known interests in funding science and associating with academics.
This document is page 368 from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?' which has been included in a House Oversight Committee file production. The text outlines various scientific incentive prizes (XPRIZEs) funded by entities like Google, Qualcomm, and Nokia, and provides a historical overview of the Fields Medal in mathematics, noting its funding by Joseph Field and the 2014 win by Maryam Mirzakhani. While part of a production likely related to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell (given the 'House Oversight' stamp common in those files), the specific content of this page discusses general scientific philanthropy.
This document is a page (352) from a book or essay titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', marked with a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. The text discusses theoretical physics, determinism, and the computability of the Universe, referencing Stephen Wolfram's theories, Turing's theorem, and Andrew Wiles' 1995 proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. It explores philosophical questions about where and how the Universe stores information and challenges deterministic views using quantum mechanics concepts like bosons and Kochen-Specker cubes.
This document page, stamped with a House Oversight identifier, contains a philosophical essay titled 'Free Will Universe.' The text argues against determinism, using Andrew Wiles' mathematical discoveries as evidence of non-computational human thought, while contrasting this view with the deterministic philosophy of Daniel Dennett. It explores the implications of a determined universe modeled as a single algorithm or 'clockwork.'
Wiles told his wife he suspected he might have a solution to the theorem.
Announcement of the solution after nearly 30 years of work.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity