unnamed accuser
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dominique Strauss-Kahn
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Alleged encounter |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Alleged incident/rape involving Dominique Strauss-Kahn and a hotel maid. | Sofitel suite | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Civil complaint filed against Ms. Maxwell by one of her accusers | Unknown | View |
| 2016-11-01 | N/A | An alleged victim of Donald Trump canceled a press conference one week before the election due to... | Not specified | View |
| 2008-01-24 | N/A | A lawsuit seeking more than $50 million was filed against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual exploi... | N/A | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Alleged rape incident mentioned in the lawsuit. | Not specified (lawsuit file... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001689.jpg
This document is the final page of a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated July 29, 2020. The defense argues for a protective order to restrict prospective witnesses—specifically those who have also filed civil suits against Maxwell—from using criminal discovery materials to bolster their civil cases or leak information to the press. The document highlights the intertwined nature of the criminal indictment and existing civil complaints.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029941.jpg
This document appears to be page 10 of an opinion piece, essay, or legal argument contained within a House Oversight Committee file. The text defends Dominique Strauss-Kahn regarding the sexual assault allegations at the Sofitel, arguing that the 'presumption of innocence' has been lost and criticizing the media's immediate acceptance of the accuser's narrative. The author distinguishes between being a 'victim of society' (economic status) and a 'victim of aggression' (criminal act).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021814.jpg
An email chain from January 9, 2015, between Jeffrey Epstein and a woman named Nadia (identified as a pilot). Epstein drafts a statement for Nadia to issue, in which she would deny being his 'sex slave,' claim she met him as an adult, and attack an accuser as a 'delusional thief' and the reporter as 'repressed.' In the correspondence, Nadia jokes, 'I'm a pilot...I prefer sex slave to copilot ;)'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021774.jpg
This document appears to be a printed email or internal communication containing the text of a New York Times article dated July 1, 2008. The article details Jeffrey Epstein leaving Little St. James Island to fly to Florida and surrender to the Palm Beach County jail to serve an 18-month sentence for soliciting prostitution. The document concludes with a strict confidentiality disclaimer declaring the communication the property of Jeffrey Epstein and listing the contact email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032343.jpg
This document is an email thread from November 10, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein and an unidentified (redacted) sender. Epstein shares a Daily Mail link debunking assault allegations involving himself and Donald Trump. The respondent expresses sympathy for the accusations, asks if Epstein knew the accuser, and inquires about a recent trip.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032343.jpg
This document is an email thread from November 10, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein and an unidentified (redacted) sender. Epstein shares a Daily Mail link debunking assault allegations involving himself and Donald Trump. The respondent expresses sympathy for the accusations, asks if Epstein knew the accuser, and inquires about a recent trip.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030309.jpg
This document is a New York Times article from July 1, 2008, detailing Jeffrey Epstein beginning his 18-month sentence for soliciting prostitution in Palm Beach County, Florida. The article includes quotes from Epstein ('I respect the legal process') and his legal representative, Mr. Lefcourt, who criticizes the public release of information. An email disclaimer for 'jeevacation@gmail.com' is appended to the article, and the entire document is labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030309'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity