| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Edward Jay Epstein
|
Author subject |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
unnamed accuser
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Keller
|
Commentator subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bernard-Henri Lévy
|
Supporter subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cyrus Vance, Jr.
|
Prosecutor defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cyrus Vance Jr.
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Thompson
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bernard-Henri Lévy
|
Supporter defender |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Alleged incident/rape involving Dominique Strauss-Kahn and a hotel maid. | Sofitel suite | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Strauss-Kahn affair | Implied (New York/Internati... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Arrest and media coverage of Dominique Strauss-Kahn | New York/America | View |
| 2011-06-06 | N/A | Hearing for Dominique Strauss-Kahn where he was greeted by protesters. | Courthouse | View |
| 2011-05-01 | N/A | The arrest and public display ('perp walk') of Dominique Strauss-Kahn. | America (likely New York) | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Arrest of Dominique Strauss-Kahn | JFK Airport | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Rape charges brought and dropped against Dominique Strauss-Kahn. | New York | View |
This document is a legal memorandum submitted on February 23, 2021, supporting Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail in the SDNY. Maxwell proposes two new conditions to assure her appearance: formally renouncing her French and British citizenships to prevent flight to those countries, and placing all assets (except legal fees and living expenses) into a new account monitored by retired Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. The defense argues these unprecedented conditions, combined with her strong ties to the US, negate flight risk and claims she is being unfairly treated as a substitute for Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (dated Dec 28, 2020) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text outlines proposed conditions including home detention, renunciation of foreign citizenship, and asset monitoring by a retired judge and former US Attorney. It compares her situation to the case of Dominique Strauss-Kahn, noting that he was granted bail despite being a foreign citizen arrested while attempting to leave the country on serious sexual assault charges, whereas Maxwell faces 26-year-old claims.
This page is an excerpt from a legal filing dated April 1, 2021, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that wealthy male defendants with foreign ties (listing specific examples like Madoff and Weinstein) were granted bail to prepare for trial, and Maxwell deserves the same treatment. It cites legal precedents stating that pretrial detention is an 'extraordinary remedy' reserved for limited cases.
This document is page 317 of a book (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the filename and content), containing endnotes for pages 121-129. The text lists bibliographic citations for various articles and reports primarily concerning Edward Snowden, the NSA surveillance leaks, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, and government intelligence activities between 2011 and 2016. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019805', indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
This document is page 121 from a book (titled 'The Great Divide' in the header, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein based on context and file metadata) included in a House Oversight production. The text discusses the erosion of privacy through government subpoenas to private companies like Facebook and Apple, citing the 2011 investigation of Dominique Strauss-Kahn by Cyrus Vance Jr. and data mining by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as examples. While part of the Epstein document production (indicated by file name and Bates stamp), this specific page focuses on general privacy issues and the Strauss-Kahn case rather than Jeffrey Epstein directly.
In this July 2011 email thread, Jeffrey Epstein urges publicist Peggy Siegal to use her connection with Arianna Huffington to discredit the woman accusing Prince Andrew of sexual abuse. Epstein claims the accuser is a 'fraud' and a 'liar' comparable to the accuser in the Dominique Strauss-Kahn case, and alleges she worked for Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Siegal agrees to forward the information if Epstein corrects his grammar, while also sharing gossip about Prince Albert of Monaco.
This email thread from July 1, 2011, captures a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and publicist Peggy Siegal. Epstein asks Siegal to contact Arianna Huffington to discredit Prince Andrew's accuser (implied to be Virginia Giuffre), claiming she has a criminal record, is a liar, and worked for Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago as a 'telephone answerer' rather than being a victim. Siegal agrees to forward the message if Epstein improves his grammar and shares unrelated gossip about Prince Albert of Monaco having an illegitimate child.
This document appears to be page 11 of an article or essay written by French philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy, included in House Oversight records. The text strongly defends Dominique Strauss-Kahn against the American media (specifically NY Post, Daily News, and Time) and the judicial system led by Cyrus Vance, Jr., comparing the 'pre-emptive penalty' applied to DSK to George W. Bush's 'pre-emptive war.' The page concludes with a biographical note on Lévy.
This document appears to be page 10 of an opinion piece, essay, or legal argument contained within a House Oversight Committee file. The text defends Dominique Strauss-Kahn regarding the sexual assault allegations at the Sofitel, arguing that the 'presumption of innocence' has been lost and criticizing the media's immediate acceptance of the accuser's narrative. The author distinguishes between being a 'victim of society' (economic status) and a 'victim of aggression' (criminal act).
This document appears to be page 9 of an essay or article (likely by Bernard-Henri Lévy based on style and context, though not named on this page) defending Dominique Strauss-Kahn. The text critiques a commentary by 'Keller' in The New York Times Magazine regarding French support for DSK, arguing against 'class justice in reverse' and the 'sacralisation of the victim’s word.' The author references their own history of activism in Bosnia, Asia, and Africa.
This document appears to be page 8 of an essay or article (possibly by Bernard-Henri Lévy or a similar intellectual, given the style and context) defending Dominique Strauss-Kahn (DSK) during his sexual assault scandal. The text argues that DSK is being judged guilty based on his 'class' rather than facts, drawing parallels to the Dreyfus Affair and French history. It mentions receiving a letter from Bill Keller of the NYT on May 20. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation file.
This document appears to be page 7 of an essay or article critiquing the American judicial treatment of Dominique Strauss-Kahn. The author argues that DSK was dehumanized and turned into a symbol of privilege and 'arrogant France' rather than being treated as an individual entitled to a fair hearing. The text specifically attacks the 'pornographic' nature of DSK's public humiliation and the conduct of the opposing attorney, Kenneth Thompson.
This document is a reproduction of a 'The Daily Beast' article titled '5 Lessons of the DSK Affair' by Bernard-Henri Lévy, dated July 2, 2011. The article defends Dominique Strauss-Kahn (DSK) against sexual assault allegations, arguing that the accuser lied and criticizing the media spectacle ('sideshow') surrounding the legal proceedings. The document bears a House Oversight footer.
This document is page 229 of a larger report, likely from a House Oversight committee, consisting of numbered citations for various sources. The citations reference articles and events from 2011-2015 concerning government leaks (David Petraeus), surveillance (NSA, Edward Snowden), and related legal matters. The key Epstein-related information is citation #14, which references an article titled "What Really Happed To Strauss-Kahn" written by Edward Jay Epstein for the New York Review of Books on December 22, 2011.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-01-01 | Paid | Dominique Strauss... | Court | $1,000,000.00 | Cash bail posted in Strauss-Kahn case. | View |
| 2011-01-01 | Paid | Dominique Strauss... | Court | $5,000,000.00 | Additional bail bond posted in Strauss-Kahn case. | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity