This document is page 178 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00003112) of a filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated April 16, 2021. It is a legal memorandum discussing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7 and the standards for the sufficiency of an indictment. The text cites various legal precedents (Alfonso, Resendiz-Ponce, Wey, Stringer) to argue that an indictment generally does not need to specify evidentiary details or how an offense was committed, provided it tracks the statutory language and protects against double jeopardy.
This document is page 13 (pagination xii) of a court filing (Document 204) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 16, 2021. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing previous legal cases (legal precedents) cited elsewhere in the full brief, predominantly from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the Southern District of New York.
A first-person narrative, likely by Jeffrey Epstein, detailing legal conflicts and alleged corruption surrounding his prosecution. The document describes the theft of his 'black book' by his houseman Alfredo Rodriguez, the subsequent sting operation, and allegations that attorney Brad Edwards used the stolen book to solicit clients against him. It also details a dispute over excessive legal fees with defense attorney Gerald Lefcourt ($800k in questioned cash) and the hiring of Guy Lewis due to his connections with US Attorney Alex Acosta.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity