| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
12
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Investigator subject |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Adversarial investigator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Tracking monitoring |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Commentator subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein (e:jeeitunes)
|
Social professional interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Wolff
|
Professional introduction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joe Whitley
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jed Rubenfeld
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jay P. Lefkowitz
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Potential advocate author |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Ken Starr Book Tour | Various | View |
| 2018-12-15 | N/A | Email correspondence between Michael Wolff, Jeffrey Epstein, and others discussing a public relat... | N/A (Digital Communication) | View |
| 2018-12-15 | N/A | Drafting of a public relations statement/defense regarding the 2008 Epstein plea deal. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2018-12-15 | N/A | An email discussion between Jeffrey Epstein's associates about crafting a public relations narrat... | N/A | View |
| 2018-09-11 | N/A | Ken Starr arrival/presence | New York (Implied) | View |
| 2018-07-11 | N/A | Proposed stay/meeting in New York involving Ken Starr | New York | View |
| 2018-07-11 | N/A | Ken Starr presence in New York (implied by 'ny 11, 12') | New York | View |
| 2018-07-05 | N/A | Discussion regarding Ken Starr lobbying Senators Cruz and Cotton for Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Co... | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2018-06-22 | N/A | Ken Starr present in New York for the weekend. | New York (NY) | View |
| 2018-05-19 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein introduces Michael Wolff and Ken Starr via email. Michael Wolff follows up, reque... | N/A | View |
| 2018-05-19 | N/A | Epstein facilitates a connection between Ken Starr and Michael Wolff for an off-the-record discus... | N/A | View |
| 2018-05-19 | N/A | Michael Wolff contacts Ken Starr, via an introduction from Jeffrey Epstein, to request an off-the... | N/A | View |
| 2017-11-22 | N/A | Meeting between Jeffrey Epstein and Ken Starr. | Unknown (Epstein's location) | View |
| 2016-12-25 | N/A | Ken Starr agrees to handle appeal for hip-replacement plaintiffs against Johnson & Johnson. | Federal Court | View |
| 2016-12-25 | N/A | Christmas Day correspondence. | N/A | View |
| 2016-12-25 | N/A | Holiday correspondence | N/A | View |
| 2016-12-18 | N/A | Legal inquiry regarding JASTA | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Ken Starr steps down as president of Baylor University amid mishandling of sexual assault allegat... | Baylor University | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Ken Starr stepped down as president of Baylor University amid sexual assault handling allegations. | Baylor University | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Ken Starr steps down as president of Baylor University amid sexual assault handling scandal | Baylor University | View |
| 2010-12-27 | N/A | Newsmax article published regarding Ken Starr's presidency at Baylor University | Baylor University, Texas | View |
| 2008-06-23 | N/A | DOJ official sends a letter regarding the Epstein matter to Epstein's legal team (Starr, Lefkowit... | N/A | View |
| 2008-05-01 | N/A | Justice Department affirmed Acosta’s right to prosecute after Starr's appeal. | Washington | View |
| 2008-05-01 | N/A | Justice Department affirmed Acosta's right to prosecute Epstein. | Washington | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Meeting at the Department level. | Department of Justice | View |
An email chain from December 2016 between Ken Starr and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'). Starr expresses warm affection ('Love ya', 'A prince art thou') and informs Epstein he has taken a high-profile appeal case against Johnson & Johnson. Earlier in the chain, Epstein asks Starr a legal question regarding Donald Trump, JASTA (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act), and constitutional challenges.
An email chain from December 2016 between Ken Starr and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'). Starr expresses warm affection ('Love ya', 'A prince art thou') and informs Epstein he has taken a high-profile appeal case against Johnson & Johnson. Earlier in the chain, Epstein asks Starr a legal question regarding Donald Trump, JASTA (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act), and constitutional challenges.
An email chain between Ken Starr and Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) from December 2016. Epstein asks a legal question on Dec 18 regarding Donald Trump's support of JASTA (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act) and its impact on a constitutional challenge. Starr replies on Christmas Day with friendly holiday greetings, referencing Santa in swim trunks heading 'southward,' implying Epstein is in a warm climate.
An email exchange between Ken Starr and Jeffrey Epstein from December 2016. Starr sends holiday greetings referencing Epstein traveling 'southward' with 'swim trunks,' while responding to a previous email from Epstein asking if Donald Trump's support of JASTA (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act) moots a constitutional challenge. The document includes a standard legal disclaimer asserting attorney-client privilege.
This document appears to be a page from a report or article included in House Oversight Committee records (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030265). It discusses the Mueller investigation, potential Supreme Court involvement, and the political implications of the November election on the President's legal and congressional standing. It features a quote from former independent prosecutor Ken Starr regarding the tendency of 'strong presidents' to win legal cases.
An email chain from December 2018 involving Jeffrey Epstein, his lawyers (Ken Starr, Alan Dershowitz), and PR advisors (Michael Wolff, Matthew Hiltzik) strategizing a defense against renewed scrutiny of Epstein's 2008 plea deal. Ken Starr drafts a statement arguing the federal government overstepped in a local matter and defending the plea deal as appropriate, characterizing Epstein's crimes merely as 'solicitation of prostitution.' Michael Wolff suggests deflecting blame by highlighting Epstein's connections to Bill Clinton and framing the current scrutiny as a political attack on Trump Labor Secretary Alex Acosta.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a report or article discussing the Mueller investigation's potential path through the courts. It speculates on the impact of the 'November election' on the President's legal and political fate. It explicitly quotes Ken Starr (who notably served on Jeffrey Epstein's legal defense team in 2008, though here he is cited as a former independent prosecutor) regarding the tendency of 'weak presidents' to lose legal cases.
This document appears to be a page from an investigative report (likely the Miami Herald) detailing the aftermath of the Epstein non-prosecution agreement. It highlights the unusual coordination between federal prosecutors and Epstein's defense team regarding victim notification, contrasts Ken Starr's defense of Epstein with his prosecution of Clinton, and features quotes from Detective Recarey expressing regret that Epstein avoided prison and that victims were labeled prostitutes.
This document serves as a narrative summary of the tense negotiations between the US Attorney's Office (Acosta, Sloman) and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Lefkowitz, Starr) around 2008. It details how Epstein's lawyers aggressively pressured the government to prevent victim notification, leading to a secret non-prosecution agreement while the FBI briefly continued investigating in NY and NM. The text notes that in 2013, the government finally admitted they backed down on victim notifications due to objections from Epstein's attorneys.
This document is a May 19, 2018, email from author Michael Wolff to Ken Starr, with Jeffrey Epstein CC'd. Wolff, having been introduced to Starr by Epstein, requests an 'off-the-record' interview with Starr to gather 'counsel and background' for a book sequel about the legal case against President Trump. The email highlights a stated friendship between Jeffrey Epstein and Ken Starr.
This document is a December 2018 email chain where author Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein on public relations strategy. Wolff responds to a forwarded defense statement written by Ken Starr, who argues Epstein's plea deal was justified and not a 'sweetheart deal'. Wolff suggests leveraging Epstein's connection to former President Clinton and framing the story's resurgence as a political attack on then-Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, the former prosecutor in the case.
This document is a December 15, 2018 email chain revealing a discussion about public relations strategy for Jeffrey Epstein. The chain includes a forwarded message from Ken Starr, who calls Epstein a 'now-friend' and provides a drafted defense of his controversial plea deal, framing it as a state matter with federal overreach. Correspondents Michael Wolff and Matthew Hiltzik discuss strategic messaging, including whether to invoke Epstein's Clinton connection, target Trump official Alex Acosta, and have Epstein admit some wrongdoing.
Challenging federal jurisdiction of the case.
Certified letter seeking response for the story (no response received).
Certified letter requesting response for the story (no response received).
Correspondence between Epstein attorney and government supervisors
Correspondence between Epstein attorney and government attorneys/supervisors not produced in discovery.
Certified letter and inquiry through spokesman regarding the story; no response received.
Provides a written defense of Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal, arguing it was a state matter and federal involvement was an overreach. He characterizes the 'sweetheart deal' critique as misplaced and defends federal officials like Alex Acosta.
Starr provides a lengthy defense of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, arguing it was not a 'Sweetheart deal' and that the federal involvement was an overreach into a state-level matter. He characterizes Epstein's crime as 'solicitation of prostitution' without coercion or violence.
Drafts a statement defending the plea deal ('Sweetheart deal!') and criticizing federal intrusion.
Starr provides a lengthy defense of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, arguing it was not a 'Sweetheart deal' and that the federal involvement was an overreach into a state-level matter. He characterizes Epstein's crime as 'solicitation of prostitution' without coercion or violence.
Provides a written defense of Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal, arguing it was a state matter and federal involvement was an overreach. He characterizes the 'sweetheart deal' critique as misplaced and defends federal officials like Alex Acosta.
i vote yes as it makes you relevant to today rather than merely re- reciting an old tale. :) or tail?
Can you talk? Impt.
Wise counsel. Thx!
Detailed advice on legal arguments regarding presidential immunity, Trump, and suggested talking points for Starr's book tour regarding the Clintons.
Suggests connecting Epstein to Jed Rubenfeld regarding 'procedural fairness in campus adjudicatory proceedings' which might be relevant to 'your friend's unhappy situation'.
Epstein asks Starr to speak to Michael Wolff 'totally off the record' about indicting a sitting president and questions if Trump Corp has 'constitutional baggage'.
Starr agrees to the request: 'Happy to do so. Feel free to give Michael my email address.'
Michael Wolff, after being introduced by Jeffrey Epstein, writes to Ken Starr. He offers to send Starr his book on the Trump White House and requests Starr's counsel and background information for a sequel focusing on legal cases against Trump, offering to speak 'off-the-record'.
Michael Wolff writes to Ken Starr, expressing delight in meeting him and mentioning that Jeffrey Epstein has spoken of his friendship with and respect for Starr. Wolff offers to send Starr his book on the Trump White House and requests Starr's 'counsel and background' for a sequel focusing on the legal case against Trump. Wolff offers to speak on an 'off-the-record basis'.
Asks for advice regarding a professor friend accused of inappropriate touching in a foreign country by a third party.
Holiday greeting ("Yuletide hugs") and reference to Santa going "southward" (swim trunks donned).
Holiday greetings ('Yuletide hugs'), references Santa going southward.
Wishes Starr peace and says he deserves it.
Thanks Epstein ('A prince art thou'), mentions taking Johnson & Johnson appeal case. Signs off 'Love ya'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity