| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Redacted Sender 2
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient 1
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender 2
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 |
This document is an email chain between USANYS employees dated August 10 and 11, 2019. The emails circulate a news report (citing Reuters, linking to Breitbart) regarding prison guards skipping mandatory checks prior to the death of Jeffrey Epstein.
An email chain between USANYS employees dated August 27, 2019, discussing a court proceeding related to Jeffrey Epstein. The emails refer to the event as 'The Epstein circus,' mention a 'gorgeous redirect' by a colleague, and note the presence of '20 victims' who likely spoke at the hearing.
This document is a forwarded email chain dated August 27, 2019, regarding a transcript request for Case No. 19-CR-490 (the federal criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein). The email confirms the attachment of the requested case copy and asks for confirmation of delivery. The names of all senders and recipients have been redacted.
An email chain between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated August 20, 2019. The subject line references 'Epstein Estate Touhy Requests,' indicating legal proceedings regarding the release of information related to the Epstein Estate. The body of the emails concerns an employee's trip to Dallas, TX for depositions and a colleague's recommendation to visit the JFK museum.
An email chain from August 15, 2019, involving the FBI, USANYS, OIG, and OCME regarding the viewing of surveillance footage related to Jeffrey Epstein. The sender notes that due to 'software issues,' the footage cannot be viewed outside of FBI space and invites the recipients to view it at 290 Broadway.
An email thread from March 2020 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The participants discuss a Detroit News article reporting that the University of Michigan switched law firms (dropping Steptoe) because the firm represented Jeffrey Epstein, Roman Polanski, and Robert Anderson. The prosecutors express a lack of sympathy for the law firm, with comments like 'oops', 'Can't say I feel bad for Steptoe about this', and 'Indeed'.
This document is an email chain from May 23, 2019, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The correspondence concerns the preparation of memos for a briefing with 'Ed of the DAG.' Significantly, the sender notes that following a conversation, they 'realized that we should add Epstein' to the materials, indicating active internal discussion regarding Jeffrey Epstein at the SDNY/DOJ level shortly before his arrest. The emails also discuss handling recused vs. non-recused memos in relation to 'Geoff' (likely US Attorney Geoffrey Berman).
This document is an email chain from November 2021 between staff and contractors at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email forwards PDF attachments containing trial transcripts for the case 'US V Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell), indicating ongoing monitoring or work related to the trial proceedings on that date.
An email chain from March 2020 regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case. The correspondence discusses significant technical errors in a data set provided by the FBI, specifically issues with linking emails to attachments, native files to load files, and mismatched control numbers. The replier notes the information is 'depressing but extremely helpful' and plans to address it with the FBI.
This document is an email thread from August 19, 2020, discussing an attached 'Anonymous Civilian Crime Report Related to Human Trafficking' (specifically involving child trafficking). The original sender notes that because the report is anonymous, they will not take further action but suggests the recipient can forward it to an agency if interested. The document contains a Bates number EFTA00020340.
This document is an email chain dated October 10, 2021, between individuals associated with the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the drafting and editing of a 'JOINT Proposed Voir Dire' document in response to a defense filing, likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the timing. The emails discuss edits, attachments, and coordinate a phone call.
This document is an internal email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated March 24-25, 2021. The correspondence concerns drafting a response to a discovery demand made by Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as 'GM' and 'Maxwell'). The emails include attachments referencing a letter to the USAO regarding discovery and FOIA requests.
This document is an email thread from March 2019 between redacted government officials (likely DOJ) discussing a draft status memo. The attachment filename '2019-03-06_JE_status_memo_to_ODAG.docx' indicates the memo concerns 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and is intended for the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. The discussion focuses on the length of the document and the inclusion of legal analysis.
This document is an internal email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the opening of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* in November 2021. The emails discuss logistics for the opening statements, including courtroom assignments (Main: 40 Foley, courtroom 318) and overflow rooms. Notably, one email contains a pointed critique of Florida prosecutors (referencing the earlier Epstein non-prosecution agreement), stating that while others might be afraid to prosecute 1994 crimes, the SDNY is not.
An email chain from late November and early December 2018 discussing the Miami Herald's exposé on Jeffrey Epstein. The participants, whose names are redacted, discuss whether the matter is 'staffed' and 'open,' with one noting that it is staffed 'as of today' but kept 'on the d/l' (down low/secret).
This document is an email chain from July 18, 2019, between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), specifically involving the Public Corruption Unit. The Co-Chief of the unit requests a brief meeting regarding 'Epstein Finances,' prompting a colleague to ask if a specific event triggered the request.
An email chain between USANYS employees and contractors dated January 3, 2020, discussing an upcoming '60 Minutes' segment about Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion confirms the segment focuses on his death, prompting a remark from a contractor: 'The murder mystery solved!'
This document is an internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated July 7, 2019. It announces the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein on sex trafficking charges, which occurred the previous evening. The email highlights the significance of the case regarding the victims, congratulates the legal team responsible for the indictment, and announces an upcoming press conference.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated February 14, 2019. The emails discuss a draft agenda for a meeting scheduled for the following day (Feb 15, 2019) to discuss program roles, responsibilities, and case highlights. The sender mentions incorporating 'lessons learned' from a redacted situation, likely referring to a sensitive case context.
An email thread from July 2019 between a lawyer representing Jane Doe 1 and 2 (likely Paul Cassell based on Utah Bar mention) and an investigator/official. The lawyer updates the recipient on recent filings in the Florida CVRA case, specifically arguing that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) is limited to Florida and does not extend to New York, a point relevant to ongoing investigations. The recipient requests a call to discuss the lawyer's expertise on the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).
This document is an email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated March 27-28, 2008. The correspondence discusses the timing of a Grand Jury indictment regarding Jeffrey Epstein, specifically noting that a lack of a quorum on April 8th necessitates indicting on April 1st or waiting until April 15th. The emails also contain personal pleasantries regarding a colleague's recovery from knee surgery.
This document is an email thread from December 9-10, 2007, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney and another individual regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence discusses whether Epstein had responded to a legal matter, with one party confirming they are creating PDFs of the responses. The thread concludes with a discussion about one party traveling to the other's location ('coming up here').
Email correspondence from August 25, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). The SDNY Public Corruption Unit chief contacts the SDFL Managing AUSA to arrange access to stored evidence boxes concerning the prior investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and co-conspirators, specifically to aid in the active prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. The SDFL confirms the materials are in a secure room in West Palm Beach and discusses logistics for scanning them, referencing a previous OPR inquiry that accessed the same files.
An email chain from August 19, 2021, involving the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence circulates a 'DRAFT 302' (FBI interview report) and an attachment regarding a proffer interview, though the subject of the interview is redacted.
This document is an internal email chain from April 26, 2019, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. The discussion focuses on preparing an internal 'update memo' covering case status, past actions, and next steps in preparation for a meeting with Brad Weinshiemer scheduled for the following Monday. The emails explicitly note that the memo is for internal use only and not yet intended to be sent to 'DC' (Department of Justice headquarters).
Forwarding of an email containing a draft FBI 302 report and an attachment titled 'Interview_Proffer_of_[REDACTED].pdf'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity