Parties
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | N/A | Scheduled submission of Joint Letters and Civil Case Management Plans (guidance requested on whet... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2018-08-09 | N/A | conference | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000604.jpg
This document is a "NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT" from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 26, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19CR490). It announces the filing of an official transcript for a hearing held on July 18, 2019, and details the procedures and deadlines for parties to request redactions of personal data identifiers from the transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00019227.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, is a court finding that justifies providing public access to court proceedings via telephone conference. The court argues this measure is narrowly tailored to protect public health from COVID-19 and is less restrictive than in-person hearings, which have attendance limitations. This approach allows for broad public access, even for individuals who would otherwise be barred from the courthouse under a previous order (Standing Order 20-9).
DOJ-OGR-00005275.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 22, 2021, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, outlines the court's procedures and schedule for jury selection (voir dire). It sets deadlines in November for submitting juror questionnaires, schedules a potential in-person conference, and details the voir dire process for November 16-19, which will be conducted with public access while considering COVID-19 protocols. The court also denies a request from the parties to seal the questionnaires until after jury selection is complete, citing the need for a fair trial and public access.
DOJ-OGR-00005116.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a subpoena form (AO 89B) filed in a criminal case. It outlines sections of the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17, detailing the legal requirements for producing documents, serving subpoenas, the geographic scope of service, and the consequences of non-compliance, such as being held in contempt of court. The rules also provide protections for victims when their personal information is sought.
DOJ-OGR-00008783.jpg
This document is page 77 of 83 from a court filing dated December 19, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines Jury Instruction No. 57, explaining 'Stipulations,' instructing the jury that they must accept agreed-upon facts as true and accept that stipulated witnesses would have given specific testimony, though the weight of that testimony remains for the jury to decide.
DOJ-OGR-00011689.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a judge provides preliminary instructions to the jury, emphasizing their duty not to discuss the case with anyone and explaining that all parties and counsel are forbidden from interacting with them. The judge also details the courtroom's specific COVID-19 safety protocols, which require witnesses and lawyers to use a Plexiglas enclosure with a HEPA filter when speaking.
Re: 38 LETTER MOTION
Government ordered to respond by August 13, 2020. Defendant's reply due by August 17, 2020.
Case Management Conference
Participated in by Maxwell through counsel.
Decision to unseal transcripts
Original decision to unseal Maxwell's and Doe 1's depositions.
Arraignment and bond hearing
Held over Zoom.
Pre-motion letters
Referenced as ECF Nos. 25, 26
Discovery stay
Court made clear discovery would not be stayed.
Attorney Update
Attorney Alex Rossmiller, Maurene Ryan Comey, Alison Gainfort Moe for USA added.
Opinion and Order
Court issued an opinion and order [Doc. 435] regarding the case.
Sealed Opinion
A sealed opinion resolving the motion to quash the subpoena.
Order of June 18, 2013 (Doc. 188)
Referenced as the order defining the subject matter of the Confidential Discovery Material.
Granting of Rule 54(b) judgments
Court granted joint request
SORA Hearing
Transcript of proceedings regarding Epstein's sex offender registration level.
Order granting motion for open trial
Order granting motion for open trial and to identify Jane Doe at trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity