Parties

Person

Mentions

Relationships

Events

Documents

Also known as:

unspecified parties and their lawyers

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

2 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
organization The Court	Legal representative	5	1	View
location court	Legal representative	5	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
N/A	N/A	Negotiation of expedited discovery timeline	N/A	View
N/A	Legal procedure	At the conclusion of the case, confidential documents must be returned to the designating party o...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	Agreement on approximately eight weeks for trial preparation due to complexities and S2 indictment	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	Investigation into juror misconduct	Court	View
N/A	Legal proceeding	A potential hearing is being contemplated where Juror 50 may be a witness.	N/A	View
N/A	Court proceeding	The court is holding proceedings with partial closure, allowing public access via telephone inste...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	Negotiation of a final, omnibus schedule to propose to the Court	N/A	View
N/A	Legal proceeding	The voir dire process for Ms. Maxwell's trial, during which potential jurors were questioned.	N/A	View
N/A	Jury selection	Juror No. 50 provided false answers to questions, which deprived the Court of a basis for inquiry...	Court	View
N/A	Work session	Court staff, counsel, and parties worked on a Saturday to prepare for the proceedings.	N/A	View
N/A	Jury trial	The document discusses the process of jury selection (empanelling) and challenges for cause withi...	courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	Start of a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), with the judge giving preliminary instructions to the ...	courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Trial proceedings	A judge gives preliminary instructions to the jury at the start of a trial, covering rules of con...	courtroom	View
2022-06-26	N/A	Deadline for parties to submit positions on Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein's motion	USDC SDNY	View
2022-06-24	N/A	Deadline (5:00 p.m.) for submitting statements not objected to	Court	View
2022-06-24	Legal deadline	Deadline for parties to submit non-objected statements to the Court by 5:00 p.m.	N/A	View
2022-06-24	Legal deadline	Deadline for either party to file objections to any statement with the Court by 2:00 p.m.	N/A	View
2022-06-24	N/A	Deadline (2:00 p.m.) for filing objections and statements being objected to	Court	View
2022-06-01	Legal deadline	Deadline for parties to provide any comments or objections to the first draft Presentence Investi...	N/A	View
2022-03-15	N/A	Submission of supplemental briefings (Dkt. Nos. 648, 649)	Court Docket	View
2022-03-09	N/A	Status conference held where Court gave oral directive.	Superior Court of the Virgi...	View
2021-12-08	Court proceeding	The speaker, likely a judge, outlines the procedure for the voir dire (jury selection) process, s...	Court	View
2021-12-08	Jury selection discussion / voir dire process	A discussion regarding the selection of prospective jurors, including the creation and review of ...	Implied to be a courtroom o...	View
2021-12-06	Legal proceeding	A stipulation, marked as Defendant's Trial Exhibit B, was dated and signed by the parties.	N/A	View
2021-11-29	N/A	Opening statements scheduled to occur.	USDC SDNY	View

DOJ-OGR-00000604.jpg

This document is a "NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT" from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 26, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19CR490). It announces the filing of an official transcript for a hearing held on July 18, 2019, and details the procedures and deadlines for parties to request redactions of personal data identifiers from the transcript.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00019227.jpg

This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, is a court finding that justifies providing public access to court proceedings via telephone conference. The court argues this measure is narrowly tailored to protect public health from COVID-19 and is less restrictive than in-person hearings, which have attendance limitations. This approach allows for broad public access, even for individuals who would otherwise be barred from the courthouse under a previous order (Standing Order 20-9).

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005275.jpg

This legal document, filed on October 22, 2021, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, outlines the court's procedures and schedule for jury selection (voir dire). It sets deadlines in November for submitting juror questionnaires, schedules a potential in-person conference, and details the voir dire process for November 16-19, which will be conducted with public access while considering COVID-19 protocols. The court also denies a request from the parties to seal the questionnaires until after jury selection is complete, citing the need for a fair trial and public access.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005116.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a subpoena form (AO 89B) filed in a criminal case. It outlines sections of the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17, detailing the legal requirements for producing documents, serving subpoenas, the geographic scope of service, and the consequences of non-compliance, such as being held in contempt of court. The rules also provide protections for victims when their personal information is sought.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008783.jpg

This document is page 77 of 83 from a court filing dated December 19, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines Jury Instruction No. 57, explaining 'Stipulations,' instructing the jury that they must accept agreed-upon facts as true and accept that stipulated witnesses would have given specific testimony, though the weight of that testimony remains for the jury to decide.

Court filing (jury instructions)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011689.jpg

This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a judge provides preliminary instructions to the jury, emphasizing their duty not to discuss the case with anyone and explaining that all parties and counsel are forbidden from interacting with them. The judge also details the courtroom's specific COVID-19 safety protocols, which require witnesses and lawyers to use a Plexiglas enclosure with a HEPA filter when speaking.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

As Recipient

Total

Re: 38 LETTER MOTION

From: Judge Alison J. Nathan

To: Parties

Government ordered to respond by August 13, 2020. Defendant's reply due by August 17, 2020.

Memo endorsement

2020-08-11

Communication Source

Case Management Conference

From: Court

To: Parties

Participated in by Maxwell through counsel.

Conference

2020-08-05

Communication Source

Decision to unseal transcripts

From: Court

To: Parties

Original decision to unseal Maxwell's and Doe 1's depositions.

Court decision

2020-07-23

Communication Source

Arraignment and bond hearing

From: Court

To: Parties

Held over Zoom.

Meeting

2020-07-02

Communication Source

Pre-motion letters

From: Parties

To: Court

Referenced as ECF Nos. 25, 26

Letter

2020-04-02

Communication Source

Discovery stay

From: Court

To: Parties

Court made clear discovery would not be stayed.

Conference transcript

2019-11-21

Communication Source

Attorney Update

From: Court

To: Parties

Attorney Alex Rossmiller, Maurene Ryan Comey, Alison Gainfort Moe for USA added.

Notice

2019-07-08

Communication Source

Opinion and Order

From: Court

To: Parties

Court issued an opinion and order [Doc. 435] regarding the case.

Court order

2019-02-21

Communication Source

Sealed Opinion

From: Court

To: Parties

A sealed opinion resolving the motion to quash the subpoena.

Legal opinion

2017-04-04

Communication Source

Order of June 18, 2013 (Doc. 188)

From: Court

To: Parties

Referenced as the order defining the subject matter of the Confidential Discovery Material.

Court order

2013-06-18

Communication Source

Granting of Rule 54(b) judgments

From: U.S. District Court fo...

To: Parties

Court granted joint request

Court order

2011-07-13

Communication Source

SORA Hearing

From: Supreme Court Clerks

To: Parties

Transcript of proceedings regarding Epstein's sex offender registration level.

Meeting

2011-01-18

Communication Source

Order granting motion for open trial

From: Judge Kenneth A. Marra

To: Parties

Order granting motion for open trial and to identify Jane Doe at trial.

Court order

2010-06-30

Communication Source

Discussion 0

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search