State Attorney’s Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
PBPD Chief Reiter
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Inter agency |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Plea agreement | Terms of an agreement where Epstein pleads guilty to one count of solicitation of prostitution an... | 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A proposed single deposition of Jane Doe No. 5 to be used for both criminal and civil matters in ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal decision | The State Attorney's Office decided to present the Epstein case to a grand jury. | Florida | View |
| 2007-09-12 | Meeting | Lourie, Villafaña [+others] meet with Epstein’s counsel and the State Attorney’s Office to discus... | N/A | View |
| 2006-07-24 | Legal action | The State Attorney's Office charged and arrested Epstein. The FBI in West Palm Beach formally ope... | West Palm Beach | View |
| 2006-04-01 | Plea offer | The State Attorney’s Office offered Epstein an opportunity to plead guilty to a third-degree felo... | N/A | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Legal action | The PBPD, with assistance from the State Attorney's Office, obtained a search warrant for Epstein... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021217.jpg
This legal document details a May 2006 meeting where the lead Palm Beach Police Department detective presented the state's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein to FBI and USAO representatives. The detective expressed concerns that pressure from Epstein's attorneys was compromising the state case and that Epstein may have been tipped off about a search warrant. The group discussed potential federal charges based on Epstein's use of a private plane for interstate travel with suspected underage girls, though evidence was not yet firm.
DOJ-OGR-00021215.jpg
This legal document details the aggressive tactics used by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, including a threat by attorney Alan Dershowitz to 'destroy' witnesses. It also explains the Florida State Attorney's Office's decision to present the case to a grand jury, citing a conflict of interest involving prosecutor Krischer's husband and Epstein's lawyer, Jack Goldberger, as well as the complexities of the case and the victim-witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00021214.jpg
This legal document details the early stages of the state's investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, beginning in 2005. It describes the evidence found by the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) at Epstein's home and the subsequent transfer of the case to the State Attorney's Office, led by Barry Krischer. The document highlights significant disagreements between prosecutors, like Lanna Belohlavek, and the PBPD over the strength of the evidence and the appropriate charges, as well as the defense team's efforts to undermine victim credibility and the plea negotiations that occurred.
DOJ-OGR-00021213.jpg
This document details allegations and police findings regarding Jeffrey Epstein's conduct, describing how he and his assistants recruited underage girls for massages that often escalated to sexual acts. It outlines the specific patterns of these encounters, the payment structure, the recruitment of other victims by the girls themselves, and the initiation of the PBPD investigation leading to a search warrant in October 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00021212.jpg
This document provides a timeline of key events in the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein from May 2006 to October 2008. It details the opening of the investigation, meetings between prosecutors and Epstein's counsel, the decision to offer a state-based resolution, and the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The timeline concludes with Epstein's guilty plea in state court, a subsequent legal challenge by a victim (Jane Doe), and the start of Epstein's work release program.
DOJ-OGR-00021208.jpg
This document provides a background on Jeffrey Epstein, detailing his career path from a teacher to a financier at Bear Stearns, his immense and mysterious wealth, and his various properties. It then focuses on the high-profile legal team he assembled to defend against allegations of sexual misconduct in Florida, including attorneys Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz, Jack Goldberger, and Gerald Lefcourt. The text also notes a conflict of interest that arose when Epstein hired Jack Goldberger, whose law partner was married to the Assistant State Attorney on the case.
DOJ-OGR-00031666.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 8, 2008, from attorney Aileen Josephs to attorney Lanna Belohlavek concerning the Jeffrey Epstein case (2005CF009454A). Josephs expresses frustration over a pending Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from 2006 and raises concerns about a lack of transparency, alleging that hearing dates are being changed "orally" without public record. She insists on being notified of all future hearing dates to ensure government transparency and prevent "sub rosa dealings."
DOJ-OGR-00003316.jpg
This document details the conflicting communications and actions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's work release following his June 30, 2008 plea. It reveals that while federal prosecutors (USAO) and Epstein's own attorney indicated he would not get work release, a Palm Beach Sheriff's Office official stated he was eligible, and he was ultimately placed in the program without the USAO's knowledge. The document also highlights Epstein's false statements to the court about his employment at the non-existent "Florida Science Foundation."
DOJ-OGR-00003293.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing, details the contentious negotiations between federal prosecutors (led by Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Lefkowitz) regarding an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in October 2007. It describes the defense's successful request to postpone Epstein's state guilty plea and the prosecution's growing frustration with the defense for revisiting settled issues. The prosecutors also express suspicion that the defense's delay tactics were motivated by a new civil lawsuit filed against Epstein in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00003292.jpg
This document details communications between U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, in late 2007 regarding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA). It focuses on a controversial breakfast meeting and subsequent letters where Lefkowitz claimed Acosta promised non-interference by federal authorities, a claim Acosta's office refuted in a draft response as "inaccurate" and tantamount to a "gag order." The text highlights conflicting accounts and the external criticism surrounding Acosta's handling of the case, contrasting his version of events with media reports.
DOJ-OGR-00003240.jpg
This document is a page from a legal report detailing former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta's testimony to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding his decision not to federally prosecute Jeffrey Epstein. Acosta justified his actions by citing the Petite policy, which respects state sovereignty, arguing the federal role was only to prevent a "manifest injustice" like no jail time, which did not occur with Epstein's two-year state sentence. He also expressed concerns that a federal trial would be traumatic for victims and could set a bad legal precedent by conflating state-level solicitation with federal trafficking charges.
DOJ-OGR-00003225.jpg
This legal document details communications in late 2006 and early 2007 between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys, Lilly Ann Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt, and prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney's Office. The defense sought a meeting to "make a pitch," leading to an internal disagreement between prosecutors Villafaña, who opposed the meeting without first receiving documents, and Lourie, who granted the meeting believing it was strategically valuable to hear the defense's theories. Ultimately, a meeting was scheduled for February 1, 2007, despite Villafaña's objections and her belief that the defense would not provide the requested evidence and would only use the meeting to discredit victims.
DOJ-OGR-00003217.jpg
This legal document details the aggressive legal tactics employed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, including attorney Alan Dershowitz threatening a prosecutor to destroy witnesses. It also outlines the State Attorney's Office's rationale for taking the case to a grand jury, citing the complexity of the case and the problematic possibility that Epstein's minor victims could have been prosecuted for prostitution under the existing state law.
DOJ-OGR-00003215.jpg
This legal document details the findings of a police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, describing a consistent pattern of conduct where he and his assistants recruited high-school-age girls to his Palm Beach home for massages. These encounters frequently led to sexual assault, with Epstein paying the victims $200 and encouraging them to recruit their friends. The document also notes that Epstein was aware of the investigation from its early stages and that a search warrant was executed at his residence on October 20, 2005.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029421.jpg
This page from a court filing describes the police investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct with minors against Mr. Epstein, detailing specific accusations from a 14-year-old girl and testimony from Haley Robson. It includes defense statements from attorney Mr. Lefcourt disputing the claims and mentioning a passed lie-detector test, as well as procedural actions taken by the Palm Beach police.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity