Jane Doe No. 101
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
22
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
Katherine W. Ezell
|
Client |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Robert C. Josefsberg
|
Client |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Defendant plaintiff |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser alleged |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Katherine W. Ezell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Procurer
|
Recruiter recruit |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101 first brought to Epstein's mansion at age 17. | 358 El Brillo Way, West Pal... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plaintiff lured back to Epstein mansion on at least one or two other occasions. | 358 El Brillo Way, West Pal... | View |
| 2010-12-13 | N/A | Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-12-07 | N/A | Settlement Agreement | N/A | View |
| 2009-10-15 | N/A | Court Order entered on FLSD Docket granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-07-02 | N/A | Date the document was entered on the FLSD Docket. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-06-26 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [DE 56]. | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2009-06-26 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [DE 56]. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-05-29 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102's Reply in Support of Motion to Proceed Anonymously. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2009-05-29 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal ... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2009-05-29 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion to Proceed Anonymously | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-05-22 | N/A | Plaintiffs Jane Does 101 and 102 filed a Motion for No-Contact Order. | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2009-05-04 | N/A | Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101 filed a Notice of Striking Docket Entry [7] because it was inadvertent... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2009-05-01 | N/A | Date of Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101's First Amended Complaint [DE 9] | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-05-01 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Complaint [DE 1] | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-05-01 | N/A | Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-05-01 | N/A | Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [DE 9]. | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2009-04-17 | N/A | Plaintiff filed action against Epstein (Complaint DE 1). | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-04-17 | N/A | Sexual abuse of Jane Doe No. 101 by Jeffrey Epstein when she was under age 18. | Unspecified | View |
| 2009-04-17 | N/A | Motion to Proceed Anonymously filed/signed. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-04-17 | N/A | Filing of Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. | U.S. District Court, Southe... | View |
| 2008-07-25 | N/A | Filing of Motion for Enlargement of Time | Southern District of Florida | View |
014-01.pdf
This document is a 'Motion to Proceed Anonymously' filed on April 17, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida by Jane Doe No. 101 against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff, represented by Podhurst Orseck, P.A., requests to use a pseudonym because she was sexually abused by Epstein as a minor and wishes to avoid further psychological trauma and public humiliation. The motion notes that Epstein already knows her identity from the related criminal investigation and cites precedents where other victims (Jane Does 1-7, etc.) were granted anonymity.
012.pdf
Legal filing from May 4, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's legal team accepts consolidation of multiple civil cases for depositions but opposes general consolidation for all discovery, arguing that individual cases have distinct facts and defenses that would be confused by a blanket consolidation. The document lists numerous related case numbers (e.g., 08-80119, 08-80381, 09-80469) and requests clarification on the court's previous orders regarding case management.
011.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 4, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-80591) in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's counsel requests an extension until May 26, 2009, to respond to the complaint filed on April 17, 2009. The reasons cited include the burden of other cases naming Epstein as a defendant and a conflicting state court trial scheduled for mid-May involving the defense counsel.
010.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Striking Docket Entry' filed on May 4, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, case Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff's counsel, Katherine W. Ezell of Podhurst Orseck, P.A., notifies the court that a previous docket entry was filed without a signature and has been re-filed correctly. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing numerous attorneys involved in this case and related cases against Epstein, including Bruce Reinhart (defense), Jack Scarola, and Brad Edwards.
008.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 101 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 1, 2009. The plaintiff agrees to the court's order to consolidate ten separate cases filed by various Jane Does and C.M.A. against Jeffrey Epstein for the purposes of discovery. The document includes a service list detailing the contact information for attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and the defendant.
006.pdf
This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on April 28, 2009. It addresses ten separate civil cases filed against Jeffrey Epstein by various plaintiffs (Jane Does and C.M.A.). The order grants the plaintiffs' motion to consolidate cases for discovery purposes and grants a protective order limiting Epstein to a single deposition per plaintiff to prevent piecemeal depositions, while also ordering parties in remaining cases to show cause why they should not also be consolidated.
001.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on April 17, 2009, by Jane Doe No. 101 against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff alleges that in 2003, when she was a 17-year-old high school student, she was recruited and transported to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion where she was sexually assaulted under the guise of giving massages. The complaint asserts causes of action under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 regarding coercion, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking, and transport of child pornography.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe No. 101 | $200.00 | Payment after massage session. | View |
| 2009-04-17 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe No. 101 | $0.00 | Plaintiff alleges she is entitled to money dama... | View |
Solicitation
Attempts to lure her back to the mansion for other sexual acts.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity