May 01, 2009
Plaintiff filed Complaint [DE 1]
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 102 | person | 111 | View Entity |
| Jane Doe No. 101 | person | 114 | View Entity |
| Jane Doe No. 8 | person | 24 | View Entity |
| Jane Doe No. 103 | person | 28 | View Entity |
011.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 4, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-80591) in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's counsel requests an extension until May 26, 2009, to respond to the complaint filed on April 17, 2009. The reasons cited include the burden of other cases naming Epstein as a defendant and a conflicting state court trial scheduled for mid-May involving the defense counsel.
034.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on June 18, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 09-80656) by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Epstein requests an extension until July 5, 2009, to respond to a complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 102, citing the workload from multiple concurrent cases where he is a defendant. The document confirms that Plaintiff's counsel agreed to this extension and lists the legal representatives for both parties.
053.pdf
This is an unopposed motion filed on October 29, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Epstein requests an extension until November 16, 2009, to respond to a complaint filed by 'Jane Doe No. 102' on May 1, 2009, citing that the parties are working together to potentially resolve the case. The document lists legal counsel for both sides, including Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger for Epstein, and Robert Josefsberg and Katherine Ezell for the plaintiff.
006.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on March 23, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requesting an extension of time for Jeffrey Epstein to respond to a complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 103. Epstein's legal team requests the deadline be moved from March 26 to April 5, 2010, citing workload from 'several other cases' filed in the same court in which Epstein is a defendant. The plaintiff's counsel agreed to this extension.
006.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on July 7, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Epstein's attorneys requested a one-week extension (until July 14, 2009) to respond to a complaint filed by 'Jane Doe No. 8' on May 28, 2009, citing workload from other cases involving Epstein. The motion notes that opposing counsel agreed to this extension.
Events with shared participants
Requested new deadline for Plaintiff to file response.
2009-08-12 • Southern District of Florida
Deadline for Plaintiff to file response to Defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss Count VI
2010-05-13 • Southern District of Florida
Alleged time period of conduct by Defendant involving Plaintiff
2004-01-01 • Not specified
Alleged sexual abuse of Jane Doe No. 8 by Jeffrey Epstein.
2001-01-01 • Palm Beach, Florida
Plaintiffs Jane Does 101 and 102 filed a Motion for No-Contact Order.
2009-05-22 • US District Court Southern District of Florida
Plaintiff filed action against Epstein (Complaint DE 1).
2009-04-17 • Southern District of Florida
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed
2010-12-13 • Southern District of Florida
Plaintiff filed a Complaint [DE 1]
2009-05-01 • Southern District of Florida
Motion to Proceed Anonymously filed/signed.
2009-04-17 • Southern District of Florida
Sexual abuse of Jane Doe No. 101 by Jeffrey Epstein when she was under age 18.
2009-04-17 • Unspecified
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event