Edwards Pottinger
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Four redacted victims
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Brittany Henderson
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Victims/Claimants
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BSF
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed victims
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
014.pdf
This document is a Court Order and Joint Stipulation filed on January 28, 2020, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case of Anastasia Doe v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, establishes strict protocols to maintain the plaintiff's anonymity, including requirements for sealing documents and executing non-disclosure agreements for any parties privy to her identity. It also documents the agreement between the Plaintiff's counsel (Bradley J. Edwards) and the Defendants (Executors Indyke and Kahn) to adhere to these anonymity protections.
011-01.pdf
This document is an affirmation filed on January 13, 2020, by attorney Brittany N. Henderson of Edwards Pottinger, LLC, in support of her application for admission pro hac vice in the case of Anastasia Doe v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Henderson declares she has no criminal record or disciplinary history and includes certificates of good standing from the Supreme Court of Florida (dated Dec 31, 2019) and The Florida Bar (dated Jan 10, 2020).
003.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on December 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Bradley J. Edwards seeks permission to represent Plaintiff Anastasia Doe in her lawsuit against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahan, the co-executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Edwards attests to his good standing with the Florida and New York bars and lack of disciplinary history.
003-02.pdf
This document is a proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on December 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York case of Anastasia Doe vs. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The order grants attorney Bradley J. Edwards of Edwards Pottinger LLC permission to represent the plaintiff, Anastasia Doe, in this action.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on December 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, using the pseudonym Anastasia Doe, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The nature of the suit is listed as 'Other Personal Injury' and jurisdiction is based on diversity.
EFTA00038462.pdf
An email chain from October 1, 2020, in which Maria Kelljchian, a paralegal at Edwards Pottinger LLC, contacts federal authorities regarding a client identified as a 'Florida victim' of Epstein currently living in Ohio. The email requests FBI assistance for the victim's therapy expenses and offers to coordinate a statement. The internal discussion among the recipients (likely law enforcement or prosecutors) involves coordinating interviews with victims represented by Brittany and Brad, and mentions an upcoming trip to Pennsylvania.
EFTA00038453.pdf
An email chain from February 27, 2020, discussing FBI coverage for therapy sessions for Epstein victims in West Palm Beach. The correspondence involves attorneys from Edwards Pottinger LLC inquiring about reimbursement for a therapist and verifying a list of victim names, which are redacted in the document.
EFTA00038006.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between an FBI Special Agent from the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit and a Trial Attorney from Edwards Pottinger LLC, dating from June 23 to July 13, 2020. They are coordinating telephone interviews for two victims/clients regarding the Epstein case. The attorney also specifically requests '302's' (FBI interview reports) or verification that victims have been interviewed.
EFTA00037939.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between a trial attorney from Edwards Pottinger LLC and likely federal investigators. The attorney informs the recipient that they represent four additional victims ready to speak about their experiences with Jeffrey Epstein and requests to schedule meetings during a victim briefing in New York on October 23 or 24. The recipient agrees to the meetings and suggests a preliminary discussion regarding the victims' backgrounds.
EFTA00037937.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2019 involving attorneys from Edwards Pottinger LLC and likely federal authorities (references to 'HQ'). The emails discuss coordinating interviews for victims of Jeffrey Epstein, specifically mentioning four additional victims ready to speak. The attorneys propose meetings in New York on October 23 or 24, coinciding with a 'victim briefing'.
EFTA00037927.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2020 between a Trial Attorney at Edwards Pottinger LLC and an FBI Special Agent in the New York Field Office's Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit. They are coordinating a time for the FBI agent to speak with two victims represented by the law firm. The attorney also inquires about obtaining FBI Form 302s (interview reports) to verify previous victim interviews.
EFTA00037922.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2020 between a Trial Attorney at Edwards Pottinger LLC and an FBI Special Agent from the New York Field Office's Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit. They are coordinating an interview schedule for two victims of Jeffrey Epstein represented by the law firm. The attorney also inquires about obtaining FBI Form 302s (interview reports) to verify previous victim interviews.
EFTA00037911.pdf
This document is an email chain dated June 23, 2020, regarding 'Epstein Victims.' The correspondence is between attorneys at the law firm Edwards Pottinger LLC (Fort Lauderdale). The content discusses scheduling a meeting for the following week. The specific names of the attorneys and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00037509.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 3, 2020, originating from Trial Attorney Brittany Henderson of Edwards Pottinger LLC to the FBI. The email details the structure and operation of the 'Epstein Claims Fund Program,' a voluntary compensation fund for victims of Jeffrey Epstein run independently by administrator Jordy Feldman. It clarifies that the FBI's only role in the agreement is that the administrator will inform claimants of counseling available through FBI Victim Services, and notes that the USVI Attorney General had previously delayed the program via a lien but an agreement has since been reached.
EFTA00030765.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2021 involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the law firm Edwards Pottinger. The correspondence concerns 'Touhy Requests' related to a client identified as '[Redacted] Doe'. Paralegal Maria Kelljchian forwarded an attachment from attorney Brad Edwards to the USANYS. The content of the internal USANYS discussion is largely redacted.
EFTA00030231.pdf
This document is an email dated June 26, 2019, forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Gov't Says Epstein Victims Can't Scrap Nonprosecution Deal.' The article details the federal government's response to a lawsuit by Epstein's victims (Doe v. U.S.), where prosecutors argued that while the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) was violated by Alexander Acosta in 2008, the nonprosecution agreement cannot be undone. The government proposed a meeting and a public hearing for victims to be heard, a remedy the victims' lawyer Brad Edwards criticized as insufficient.
EFTA00027776.pdf
This document is a legal filing by Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and 2 in May 2019, arguing for specific procedures to determine a remedy after the court ruled the Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The petitioners argue the Government should immediately announce its proposed remedy, specifically the rescission of the NPA's immunity clauses, and request limited discovery including depositions of key figures like former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz regarding a secret 2007 'breakfast meeting.' The filing includes correspondence between victims' counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office, highlighting the Government's delay tactics and the recent recusal of the Southern District of Florida office.
EFTA00027770.pdf
This document is an email from May 2019 forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Epstein Victims Demand Apology From Prosecutors'. The article details how two victims (Jane Does) requested a Florida federal court to nullify the 2008 non-prosecution agreement signed by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, arguing it violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims sought nullification of the deal, a reopening of the criminal case, an apology, and a hearing with Acosta and Epstein present.
EFTA00025398.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2020 between the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). OPR is seeking to interview 32 individuals regarding their historical contacts (2005-2008) with the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) and FBI Miami concerning the Epstein case. SDNY agrees to the interviews but requests that OPR avoid discussing the substance of the underlying criminal scheme or interactions with Epstein to avoid interfering with SDNY's active investigation, noting that any relevant statements must be handled as '3500 material' (Jencks Act). The correspondence lists the legal representation for the 32 individuals, noting the majority are represented by Brad Edwards.
EFTA00022960.pdf
This document is a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team objecting to the unsealing of specific docket entries (143, 173, 199, 164, and 230) in the civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre. The defense argues that these documents contain sensitive information regarding non-parties ('Does'), inadmissible hearsay, and prejudicial materials such as flight logs and police reports that were improperly filed to bias the court. The filing emphasizes the need to protect the privacy of non-parties and the integrity of ongoing criminal investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's conduct.
EFTA00022546.pdf
This document is a Reply Brief filed by victims Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's intervention brief regarding remedies for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims argue for the partial rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed in 2007, specifically the immunity provisions, on the grounds that the agreement was illegally concealed from victims in violation of the CVRA. The brief refutes Epstein's arguments regarding due process, contract law, estoppel, and separation of powers, asserting that the NPA is unenforceable due to its illegal formation and the government's failure to confer with victims.
EFTA00021914.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2020 involving a Trial Attorney from Edwards Pottinger LLC. The attorney is communicating with redacted recipients to provide a list of clients (whose names are redacted) who either spoke with the FBI or were identified as victims in the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement. The purpose is to secure victim notification letters for these individuals.
EFTA00021331.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 10, 2019, involving attorneys from Edwards Pottinger LLC (Brittany Henderson and Brad Edwards). The discussion concerns scheduling interviews for four victims related to the Epstein case, set for October 23 and 24, 2019. Specific scheduling preferences and travel concerns for the redacted victims are mentioned.
EFTA00019911.pdf
This document is a December 2019 email chain involving the law firm Edwards Pottinger LLC. The emails discuss managing a digital 'Epstein share drive' and contain numerous PDF attachments representing historical communications (emails, calls, meetings) with Jeffrey Epstein dating from 2008 to 2012. The attachments reference specific interactions, including a 'spot of bother' conversation in 2008 and meetings in 2010.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity