Edwards Pottinger
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Four redacted victims
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Brittany Henderson
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Victims/Claimants
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BSF
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed victims
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
076.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on December 8, 2020, in the U.S. District Court (SDNY). The plaintiff 'VE' and the defendants (Epstein's estate executors Indyke and Kahn, along with associated entities) agreed to dismiss the case with prejudice because the plaintiff resolved her claims through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The order was signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
066.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Order Staying Action from June 2020 in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff 'VE' and the defendants (Epstein's estate executors Indyke and Kahn, and associated entities) agreed to pause the litigation to allow the plaintiff to participate in the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program,' a non-adversarial alternative. Judge Debra Freeman signed the order, staying the case and requiring a status report by August 14, 2020.
065.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order filed on June 12, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625). The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', and the defendants (Executors of the Epstein Estate and associated entities) agreed to stay the lawsuit to allow the plaintiff to participate in the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program', a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. The document is signed by attorneys Brad Edwards (for the plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (for the defendants).
054.pdf
This document is a Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of VE v. Indyke et al. It outlines the agreed-upon timeline for the exchange of evidence, including initial disclosures, medical records, and expert reports. The filing identifies the key subjects of discovery as Epstein's alleged torts against the plaintiff, the liability of the corporate defendants, and the plaintiff's damages.
051.pdf
This document is a letter dated January 10, 2020, from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding five specific cases involving 'Doe' plaintiffs against Darren K. Indyke and other Epstein-related entities. Edwards informs the court that while discussions with the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program are productive, his clients do not wish to stay their lawsuits. The letter also outlines an agreed-upon discovery schedule with the Estate's counsel, Mr. Moskowitz.
045.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law opposing a Motion to Dismiss in the case of VE v. Indyke et al. The plaintiff, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse beginning in 2001 at age 16, argues that the corporate defendants (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, and NES LLC) are liable for negligence, negligent security, and negligent supervision. The memorandum asserts these entities were integral to Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise, with employees facilitating the recruitment and scheduling of victims, and argues that claims are valid under the New York Child Victims Act.
044.pdf
This document is a letter from Bradley J. Edwards (Edwards Pottinger LLC), attorney for Plaintiff VE, to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street (1:19-cv-07625). The letter requests an extension of time to file an Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, moving the deadline from December 13, 2019, to December 18, 2019. The document includes Judge Nathan's handwritten 'SO ORDERED' endorsement dated December 18, 2019.
043.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 13, 2019, regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. Edwards requests a five-day extension (until December 18, 2019) to file the Plaintiff's Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The letter notes that the Defendants have been conferred with and have no objection to the extension.
041.pdf
This document is a letter filed on December 9, 2019, by attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street (1:19-cv-07625). The letter informs the court that the Plaintiff (VE) will not file an amended pleading in response to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed in November 2019, but will instead defend the existing First Amended Complaint. The document establishes the legal representation of the plaintiff by Edwards Pottinger LLC in this civil action against an Epstein-related entity.
028.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., dated November 12, 2019. Edwards opposes the Defendants' request for a two-week extension to respond to the complaint, arguing that they have already been granted a 45-day extension and that the upcoming Rule 26(f) conference should proceed. The letter notes that the Defendants' delay is related to a filing in the U.S. Virgin Islands regarding a 'claims resolution program' for the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, which the Plaintiff argues should not halt the current litigation.
024.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on October 16, 2019, by attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It concerns the case 'VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al.' and serves to alert the court to a recent decision in a related Epstein case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke) where Judge Castel allowed a plaintiff to proceed anonymously, supporting Edwards' client's similar motion.
023.pdf
This document is a civil summons filed on September 26, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN. The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing several entities including Nine East 71st Street Corporation and Financial Trust Company, Inc., as well as Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The document requires the defendants to serve an answer to the complaint within 21 days to the plaintiff's attorney, J. Stanley Pottinger.
022.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on September 25, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing several entities including Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., NES, LLC, and the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn). The summons instructs the defendants to respond to the complaint within 21 days.
017.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action issued on September 10, 2019, by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing several entities and individuals associated with the Epstein estate, including Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company Inc., NES LLC, Darren K. Indyke, and Richard D. Kahn. This specific summons is addressed to Financial Trust Company, Inc. in the US Virgin Islands.
015.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on September 9, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN). The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing several Epstein-related entities (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, NES LLC) and individuals Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. This specific summons is addressed to NES, LLC in St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands.
013.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action (Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN) filed on September 9, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff 'VE' is suing multiple defendants including Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., NES, LLC, Darren K. Indyke, and Richard D. Kahn. The summons is specifically directed to Nine East 71st Street Corporation, care of Darren K. Indyke.
012.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on September 6, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, identified only as 'VE', is suing three Epstein-related corporate entities: Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC. The summons is directed to Darren K. Indyke, a known lawyer for Jeffrey Epstein, acting as the agent for these corporations.
011.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on September 6, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN). The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing several Epstein-related entities: Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC. The summons is specifically addressed to NES, LLC at an address in St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands, instructing them to respond to the complaint represented by attorney J. Stanley Pottinger.
010.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on September 6, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN). The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC. The summons is specifically addressed to Financial Trust Company, Inc. in St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands, instructing them to respond to the complaint represented by attorney J. Stanley Pottinger.
006.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on August 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Brittany N. Henderson of Edwards Pottinger, LLC requests permission to represent Plaintiff 'VE' in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and associated entities (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, NES LLC). Henderson certifies her good standing with the Florida bar.
004.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on August 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625-AJN). The plaintiff, identified only as 'VE', is requesting permission to proceed anonymously in a lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The defendants include Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as representatives of the estate, as well as Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC.
002.pdf
This is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on August 14, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit alleging negligence. The plaintiff, identified only as 'VE', is represented by J. Stanley Pottinger and is suing three entities associated with Jeffrey Epstein: Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC. The document establishes diversity jurisdiction.
042.pdf
This document is a 'Joint Stipulation for Dismissal' filed on November 9, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-11869). Plaintiff 'Anastasia Doe' agrees to dismiss her case against the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Indyke and Kahn) with prejudice because her claims were resolved through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The order is signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil.
040.pdf
A court filing from the Southern District of New York dated November 2, 2020, stipulating the dismissal of a case brought by 'Anastasia Doe' against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The dismissal is with prejudice and results from the plaintiff resolving her claims through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The document is signed by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards (Plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (Defendants).
016.pdf
This document is a Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule filed on February 6, 2020, in the Southern District of New York case 'Anastasia Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn'. It outlines the timeline and procedural rules for the discovery phase of the lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, including deadlines for initial disclosures, document requests, and expert discovery.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity