ALISON J. NATHAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror Number 70
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional judge and defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Judicial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial oversight |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Judicial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Judge litigant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Warden for MDC
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Metropolitan Detention center
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Presiding judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Defendant judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sophia Papapetru
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Judicial authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Parties in the case (Ms. Maxwell, government)
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Department of Justice
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. | United States Courthouse at... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing hearing | The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Proposed meeting | Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... | United States District Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. | courtroom | View |
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | Charging conference | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal judgment | A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Imposition of Judgment | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000891.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and a denied request for an in camera conference regarding a renewed bail motion. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders balancing privacy interests with public access, ultimately allowing tailored redactions to defense letters but denying the request to keep proceedings entirely sealed or in camera.
DOJ-OGR-00000890.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court docket in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various filings including letters regarding discovery deadlines, affidavits, mandates from the USCA dismissing an appeal, and several memo endorsements and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding discovery schedules and conditions of confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00000889.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings from September to November 2020. It chronicles a series of letters, motions, and orders between the prosecution (USA, represented by AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz) and the defense (Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorneys including Sternheim, Everdell, and Pagliuca), all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings primarily concern procedural matters such as requests to delay disclosure of evidence, modify protective orders, and confirm the government's disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00000887.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering a period in August 2020. It details a judicial order denying a broad defense request regarding witness privacy and discovery materials, followed by a log of subsequent legal filings (motions, affidavits, and endorsements) between the defense team (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the prosecution (Rossmiller) regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders.
DOJ-OGR-00000886.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings and orders from late July 2020. It includes entries regarding motions for a protective order, responses from both the defense and prosecution, and a Memorandum Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan resolving disputes over the protective order's language concerning victim identification and the use of discovery materials.
DOJ-OGR-00000885.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from July 13, 2020, to July 27, 2020. Key events include Maxwell's arraignment where she pleaded Not Guilty, the denial of her bail, the setting of a trial date for July 12, 2021, and various orders regarding discovery scheduling and extrajudicial statements. The document records the presence of defense attorneys Mark Cohen, Jeffrey Pagliuca, and Christian Everdell, as well as government prosecutors Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00000879.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel, including five attorneys from various law firms in New York and Denver. The case was assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00000875.jpg
This legal document is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 22, 2021. The order denies Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail. It also orders the parties to meet and confer about potential redactions to a reply brief by March 24, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000864.jpg
This is a court order filed on March 22, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The document outlines the charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts and perjury. It summarizes the procedural history of her bail applications, noting that she was twice denied bail in 2020 due to being a flight risk, and references a third motion for bail filed on February 23, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000862.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 covering the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bail and her subsequent appeal of that decision. It also details a legal dispute regarding a defense subpoena targeting a law firm representing alleged victims, with Judge Nathan ordering the firm to formally file objections to protect victim privacy under Rule 17(c)(3). The document lists various filings including letters from prosecutors (AUSAs) and defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00000861.jpg
This document is a docket summary from the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court filings and orders from late February to mid-March 2021. Key events include Maxwell's third motion for bond, subsequent responses and replies, and a motion for a time extension which was granted. The document culminates in a detailed order from Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 18, 2021, addressing disputes over the redaction and sealing of pretrial motions and exhibits, setting deadlines for the parties to confer and propose joint redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00000860.jpg
This document is a court docket log from February 2021 for Case 21-770 involving Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the filing of numerous defense motions including attempts to suppress evidence, dismiss counts based on time-bars and a non-prosecution agreement, and strike surplusage. The log also records the filing of sealed documents and correspondence between attorneys (both defense and prosecution) and Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00000859.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering entries from January 26, 2021, to February 4, 2021. It details various legal filings, including government letters regarding laptop access at MDC Brooklyn, a denial of a BOP request to vacate an order, and multiple defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss specific counts of the indictment. The document highlights the active legal maneuvering regarding redactions, detention conditions, and pre-trial dismissal attempts.
DOJ-OGR-00000858.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770, detailing legal activities related to Ghislaine Maxwell between January 12 and January 25, 2021. The entries record the transmission of an appeal, a dispute over Maxwell's access to a laptop for discovery review involving the Bureau of Prisons, and the filing of numerous pretrial motions by her legal team to dismiss various charges. The document highlights the procedural back-and-forth between the defense, the court, and the Bureau of Prisons in the pretrial phase of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000857.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering late December 2020 to mid-January 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail due to flight risk, referencing charges related to the enticement and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts. The document tracks subsequent procedural filings, including sealed documents and Maxwell's eventual filing of a Notice of Appeal on January 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000856.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the filing of opposition and reply memoranda regarding Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, as well as Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders approving redactions to protect third-party privacy and ultimately denying the motion for release on bail on December 28, 2020. The text heavily cites legal precedents regarding judicial transparency versus privacy interests (Lugosch, Amodeo).
DOJ-OGR-00000855.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from Case 21-770, detailing events between December 10 and December 18, 2020, concerning defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries primarily revolve around the filing of a court transcript, Maxwell's renewed application for bail, and the court's orders regarding the redaction of documents related to the bail application. The court, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan, approved Maxwell's proposed redactions to protect the privacy of individuals mentioned, balancing it against the public's right to access.
DOJ-OGR-00000854.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from March 2021, detailing a series of filings and orders in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell from late 2020. The entries cover procedural matters such as setting a briefing schedule for a renewed bail motion, requests to seal documents, and extensive correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. A judge denies Maxwell's request to summon the warden but orders the government to provide regular written updates on her status.
DOJ-OGR-00000853.jpg
This is a court docket sheet from December 2020 (entries 78-84) detailing proceedings in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and legal arguments concerning the sealing and redaction of defense letters. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring MDC counsel to submit information, approved specific redactions based on privacy interests, denied a request for an in-camera conference, and ordered three documents to be placed in a sealed vault.
DOJ-OGR-00000852.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 detailing procedural updates in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, extensions of discovery deadlines, and disputes over the disclosure of materials and Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC. Judge Nathan issued orders requiring the parties to confer regarding Maxwell's request for Warden Heriberto Tellez to address her detention concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00000850.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770) covering proceedings in August and September 2020. It details several legal motions, including the defense's failed attempts to compel the disclosure of victim identities, modify protective orders to use discovery in civil cases, and move Maxwell to the general prison population. The log concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal regarding the denial of the protective order modification.
DOJ-OGR-00000849.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) detailing legal proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell between July and August 2020. It includes a judicial order rejecting a defense request regarding protective orders to safeguard witness privacy, followed by a log of subsequent letter motions and responses regarding discovery disclosure filed by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and government attorney Alex Rossmiller. The document tracks the procedural back-and-forth regarding the handling of sensitive discovery materials and protective orders.
DOJ-OGR-00000848.jpg
This document is a docket sheet page from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from July 27 to July 30, 2020. It details a dispute over a protective order, specifically regarding Maxwell's ability to publicly name alleged victims who have previously spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order siding with the Government, restricting Maxwell from publicly referencing alleged victims and witnesses to protect their privacy during the criminal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00000846.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770, detailing filings and orders related to defendant Ghislaine Maxwell between July 8 and July 13, 2020. Key entries include a superseding indictment against Maxwell, motions for attorneys to appear on her behalf, and a detailed court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan setting the procedures for a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The order also outlines public and media access to the proceedings via telephone and a limited-capacity video feed at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse due to COVID-19 restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00000845.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (S.D.N.Y.) dated July 2020, detailing proceedings shortly after Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest. It outlines strict COVID-19 protocols for the courthouse, addresses victim notification rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, and sets a briefing schedule regarding detention pending trial. The document also records the official notices of appearance for Maxwell's defense team: Mark Cohen, Christian Everdell, and Laura Menninger.
Response Deadline
Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.
Order on Redactions
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89
A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.
Endorsement on Letter Motion
The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity