DAMIAN WILLIAMS
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
24
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
12
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional hierarchical |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ANDREW A. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Superior subordinate |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew A. Rohrbach
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
J. A. H. Hodge
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TOVA NOEL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Filing of Document 79 (Certificate of Compliance). | Court | View |
| 2023-04-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Certificate of Compliance for a motion in Case 22-1426, certifying that the motion co... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court filing | The Government submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Filing of Government's sentencing recommendation conclusion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government filed its sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 661 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 660 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 652 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | Document 650 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-07 | Legal filing | The United States Attorney's office filed an Application for Immunity Order to compel a witness t... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-07 | Legal authorization | Approval was granted for the U.S. Attorney's office to seek a court order to compel testimony fro... | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-07 | N/A | Filing of Document 632 | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 635 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | Filing of Government's response to defendant's post-trial motions | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 617 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-16 | Court filing | Document 603 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 598 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, stating no redactions are sought for juror ques... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-02 | N/A | Submission of Government's conclusion regarding defendant's motion for a new trial | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-02 | Legal filing | The United States Attorney's office submitted a document requesting the Court to deny a defendant... | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-01-10 | Court filing | A document was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE stating the defense's agreement with the governmen... | Southern District of New York | View |
065.pdf
This document is a Nolle Prosequi filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, the correctional officers on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died. The filing indicates that both defendants successfully completed the terms of their deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) entered into on May 20, 2021, including community service and good behavior. Consequently, the Government recommended, and Judge Analisa Torres ordered on January 3, 2022, that the charges against them be dismissed.
064.pdf
This document is a 'Nolle Prosequi' filed in the Southern District of New York, formally dismissing criminal charges against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas. The defendants, who were the guards on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died, had previously entered into a deferred prosecution agreement on May 20, 2021. Following their successful completion of community service and good behavior over a six-month period ending November 20, 2021, the U.S. Attorney's Office moved to drop the case.
20250117133905126_22-1426.pdf
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
EFTA00032897.pdf
An email chain between redacted USANYS officials from February 11, 2021, discussing media inquiries (specifically from Bloomberg) regarding a Law360 article titled '3 Names To Watch As Biden Mulls Next SDNY Top Prosecutor'. The forwarded article discusses potential successors to U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, explicitly mentioning her office's prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell as a significant recent high-profile case. The article profiles candidates Damian Williams, Katherine Goldstein, and Anjan Sahni.
EFTA00032872.pdf
This document is an email chain between USANYS employees discussing and forwarding a Law360 article dated February 10, 2021. The article discusses the Biden administration's process for selecting the next U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, mentioning current U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss's high-profile cases against Ghislaine Maxwell and Peter Nygard. The email correspondence also notes that Bloomberg has been making inquiries to the USANYS staff regarding this topic.
EFTA00031113.pdf
A letter from US Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 24, 2021, detailing the production of discovery materials. The production includes Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as courtesy materials for individuals the government does not currently intend to call. The letter also clarifies protective order designations for the enclosed documents.
EFTA00028265.pdf
A joint letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter outlines the Government and Defense positions on protecting witness identities, including the use of pseudonyms (nomenclature), voir dire procedures, jury instructions, and the handling of sealed exhibits to prevent public disclosure of victim identities. The document contains significant redactions regarding the actual names and pseudonyms of the witnesses.
EFTA00028260.pdf
A joint letter submitted to Judge Alison J. Nathan by the U.S. Attorney's Office and Defense Counsel in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document outlines agreed-upon procedures and disagreements regarding the protection of witness identities during the upcoming trial, including the use of pseudonyms, voir dire protocols to screen jurors, specific jury instructions, and the use of physical binders for sealed exhibits to prevent public viewing. It includes a heavily redacted chart meant to map true witness names to their trial pseudonyms.
EFTA00028257.pdf
A letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated November 9, 2021, regarding the production of discovery materials (Jencks Act and Giglio) for her trial. The letter explains that materials previously designated as 'confidential' are now marked with a specific reference to the Protective Order paragraphs to avoid confusion with classified document markings.
EFTA00028206.pdf
A letter dated November 6, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams (SDNY) to the Legal Department of the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn. The letter encloses witness materials relevant to the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and requests that the inmate, Ghislaine Maxwell (ID 02879-509), be granted access to these materials. The specific names of the Assistant U.S. Attorneys signing the document are redacted.
EFTA00027753.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the delivery of legal mail to Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government explains the MDC's mail processing protocols and attributes a specific delay in delivering a hard drive to an 'institutional emergency' on October 13, 2021. Judge Nathan appends an order to the end of the document, denying the defense's request for a specific delivery order but stating a firm expectation that legal mail be delivered within one business day.
EFTA00027704.pdf
A letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 18, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests permission to file motions *in limine* with redactions designed to protect the privacy of victims and third parties, specifically requesting the sealing of 'Section X' until the conclusion of the trial. The specific Assistant US Attorney signing the document has their name redacted.
EFTA00025287.pdf
This document is a discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated October 11, 2021. It details the production of Jencks Act and Giglio materials, notes that audio files from a Palm Beach grand jury testimony are unplayable, and discloses a specific allegation involving 'Minor Victim-4' instructing another to lie to Epstein about their age. The letter extensively lists financial benefits provided to various redacted witnesses by the FBI and USAO, including payments for travel, hotels, meals, and therapy sessions.
EFTA00025166.pdf
A cover letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated October 29, 2021, addressed to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn. The letter serves to transmit enclosed discovery materials and Government Exhibits related to the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The names of the Assistant US Attorneys are redacted.
EFTA00025165.pdf
A letter dated October 29, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn. The letter transmits a password for a disc containing discovery materials and government exhibits related to the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The document contains several redactions, including the password and specific identifiers.
EFTA00025066.pdf
This document is a letter dated October 11, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It formally notifies the defense that the government intends to refer to Jeffrey Epstein and other redacted individuals as co-conspirators during the trial, specifically for the purpose of admitting evidence under the co-conspirator hearsay exception. The letter is marked as Exhibit 1 and designated as confidential under a protective order.
EFTA00025035.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding the production of Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses. The letter clarifies a stamping error in a previous production (October 11, 2021) involving records 3501.507-516 and explains new labeling protocols for confidential materials to distinguish them from classified documents.
EFTA00024987.pdf
This document is a discovery production letter dated November 24, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the production of confidential records related to JPMC (JPMorgan Chase) and Lockheed Martin, governed by a Protective Order. The letter explains the specific confidentiality markings applied to the produced materials.
EFTA00024954.pdf
The United States Government filed this Memorandum of Law to preclude or limit the testimony of several expert witnesses proposed by the defense for Ghislaine Maxwell. The government argues that the testimony of psychiatrist Dr. Ryan Hall and legal expert Bennett Gershman is irrelevant and inadmissible, while the testimony of computer forensic expert Robert Kelso and forensic document specialists requires supplemental notice to be admissible. The document heavily references Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 and the Daubert standard for expert testimony.
EFTA00024791.pdf
A discovery production letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated October 28, 2021. The letter lists produced materials including a scanned contact book page, records from the United Kingdom, and materials from the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, noting confidentiality designations under a protective order.
EFTA00024225.pdf
A letter dated October 26, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn. The letter provides a password (which is redacted in the document) for a disc containing witness materials and discovery related to her case, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00024224.pdf
A cover letter dated October 26, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams (SDNY) to MDC Brooklyn regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter encloses witness materials and discovery documents for inmate Ghislaine Maxwell (Reg. No. 02879-509) and requests that she be allowed access to them.
EFTA00024223.pdf
A letter dated October 26, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn. The letter provides the password (which is redacted) for a disc containing witness materials and discovery relevant to her case, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00024222.pdf
A cover letter dated October 26, 2021, from US Attorney Damian Williams (SDNY) to MDC Brooklyn. The letter encloses witness materials and discovery for inmate Ghislaine Maxwell regarding her case (20 Cr. 330) and requests she be granted access to these materials.
EFTA00024221.pdf
A formal cover letter dated October 26, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn. The letter accompanies enclosed witness materials and discovery documents for case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' and instructs the facility to allow her access to these materials.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity