Radar Online
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Defendant Trump
|
Informational |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
high-ranking officials at the Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-25 | N/A | Filing of Complaint | United States District Cour... | View |
EFTA00038650.pdf
This document contains an email thread and a Notice of Electronic Filing from June 2024 regarding the case Radar Online LLC v. Federal Bureau of Investigation. The correspondence confirms that Judge Paul G. Gardephe granted the FBI's motion for summary judgment, allowing the FBI to withhold Jeffrey Epstein's investigative file under FOIA Exemption 7(A) due to the ongoing Ghislaine Maxwell prosecution. The case was subsequently closed.
EFTA00031941.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a request for a list of all 'Jeffrey Epstein-related FOIA lawsuits' to assist with a 'criminal discovery matter.' The chain confirms the existence of two specific cases: one involving the NY Times before Judge Engelmayer, and one involving Radar Online before Judge Gardephe (Case 17 Civ. 3956).
EFTA00030080.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). They are coordinating to assemble a comprehensive list of all Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests the office has ever received regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The discussion reveals limitations in their internal tracking database, specifically regarding requests made to the FBI that resulted in litigation defended by the SDNY, and identifies a missing record involving the media outlet Radar Online.
EFTA00021362.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York. They are coordinating to compile a list of all Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to Jeffrey Epstein for a criminal discovery matter. The correspondence confirms the existence of two specific cases: one involving the NY Times before Judge Engelmayer, and another involving Radar Online (17 Civ. 3956) before Judge Gardephe.
EFTA00019599.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team responding to a discovery request. The Government declines to produce broad FOIA-related documents citing lack of legal basis under Rule 16, but provides specific materials related to Radar Online and FBI-NY's involvement in the SDFL investigation as a courtesy. The letter also corrects a defense assertion regarding the FBI Florida office's role in the prosecution team.
EFTA00018732.pdf
An email chain from March 2021 involving an Assistant United States Attorney at the SDNY attempting to compile a comprehensive list of all FOIA requests related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence reveals limitations in their internal tracking database, noting it does not track requests made to other agencies (like the FBI) that result in litigation defended by the SDNY. Specific cases mentioned include 'NYT v BOP' and 'Epstein victim Touhy requests'.
EFTA00017740.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between staff at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the FOIA Office. An Assistant United States Attorney requests a comprehensive list of all FOIA requests the office has ever received regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The discussion clarifies the limitations of their internal tracking database, noting it tracks requests to their office but not necessarily litigation involving requests to other agencies like the FBI, and specifically identifies a missing case involving Radar Online.
EFTA00015219.pdf
This document is a legal declaration by Michael G. Seidel, an FBI official, detailing his role and the FBI's handling of a FOIA request from James Robertson and Radar Online LLC concerning Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the FBI's process for responding to the request, including the number of pages processed and withheld, and provides background on Epstein's criminal history and death.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029417.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Case 1:17-cv-03956-PGG) outlining the facts behind a FOIA request regarding the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It details Epstein's 2005 investigation, his lenient plea deal, his connections to Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, and a subsequent 2017 FOIA request by James Robertson of The National Enquirer seeking FBI records on the matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029416.jpg
This document is the first page of a civil complaint filed on May 25, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, Radar Online LLC, is suing the FBI under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to compel the release of records regarding the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein for sex trafficking. The document establishes the parties, jurisdiction, and the nature of the action.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029406.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing from May 25, 2017, detailing facts supporting a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit. It outlines Jeffrey Epstein's history as a sex offender, his controversial 2008 plea deal involving the DOJ, and his connections to high-profile figures like Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew. The text specifically describes a FOIA request submitted on April 20, 2017, by James Robertson of the National Enquirer, seeking FBI records regarding the investigation into Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029405.jpg
This document is the first page of a legal complaint filed on May 25, 2017, in the Southern District of New York by Radar Online LLC against the FBI. The lawsuit seeks to compel the FBI to release records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regarding the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein for sex trafficking. The document establishes the parties involved and the court's jurisdiction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021759.jpg
An email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeevacation') and David Grosof regarding news reports of Epstein's potential early release from prison. Grosof shares a Radar Online article claiming Epstein is being released early for assisting federal agents with a Ponzi scheme investigation in which he lost $67 million (identified as Victim #1 in the Bear Stearns Mortgage Investment Fund case). Epstein replies simply '30 days' and later follows up with a link to a Palm Beach Daily News article.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014298.jpg
This document is a printout of a Radar Online article dated August 29, 2016, titled 'Kiddie Porn, Sex Toys & Worse: Clinton Pal Jeffrey Epstein's Pedophile Palace Revealed'. The page includes the article headline, several unrelated sponsored links, and an image with the text 'TOO RUDE'. A Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014298' at the bottom indicates it was likely collected as evidence by the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026390.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal complaint filed on June 20, 2016, in which an unnamed plaintiff makes allegations against 'Defendant Trump'. The plaintiff claims that duress and threats, including a threat to have her family killed, prevented her from filing the lawsuit sooner and that she seeks an order of protection. The filing also outlines a defamation claim, stating that on April 28, 2016, Defendant Trump provided a statement to media outlets calling the plaintiff's allegations "categorically false, but disgusting".
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity