EFTA00019599.pdf

172 KB

Extraction Summary

8
People
7
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / government response letter
File Size: 172 KB
Summary

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team responding to a discovery request. The Government declines to produce broad FOIA-related documents citing lack of legal basis under Rule 16, but provides specific materials related to Radar Online and FBI-NY's involvement in the SDFL investigation as a courtesy. The letter also corrects a defense assertion regarding the FBI Florida office's role in the prosecution team.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Audrey Strauss United States Attorney
Sender of the letter representing the Government.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the case: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
Jeffrey Epstein Deceased Subject
Mentioned in relation to investigations and FOIA requests.
Christian Everdell Defense Attorney
Recipient, Cohen & Gresser LLP.
Mark Cohen Defense Attorney
Recipient, Cohen & Gresser LLP.
Laura Menninger Defense Attorney
Recipient, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
Jeffrey Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Recipient, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
Bobbi Sternheim Defense Attorney
Recipient, Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

Organizations (7)

Name Type Context
U.S. Department of Justice
Sender organization.
Southern District of New York (SDNY)
Sender's jurisdiction.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Mentioned regarding FOIA requests and investigation involvement.
Radar Online
Media outlet involved in a civil lawsuit (Radar Online v. FBI) and FOIA requests.
Cohen & Gresser LLP
Defense counsel firm.
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
Defense counsel firm.
USAO-SDFL
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, mentioned in relation to a specific investigation.

Timeline (1 events)

2021-03-29
Government provides discovery materials SDNY_GM_02743189 through SDNY_GM_02743292 (Radar Online cover letters) and SDNY_GM_02743143 through SDNY_GM_02743188 (FBI-NY/SDFL materials) as a courtesy.
New York, NY
USAO SDNY Defense Counsel

Locations (3)

Location Context
Location of SDNY and several defense attorneys.
Location of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
Implied location of USAO-SDFL and FBI Florida office.

Relationships (2)

Radar Online Litigation FBI
Mention of lawsuit Radar Online v. FBI, 17 Civ. 3956 (PGG).
Ghislaine Maxwell Co-conspirators/Associated Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned together in context of investigations: 'investigation of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell'.

Key Quotes (4)

"FOIA concerns public disclosure of agency records; it has no bearing on whether information is subject to discovery in criminal or civil cases."
Source
EFTA00019599.pdf
Quote #1
"Your letter erroneously asserts that the FBI’s Florida office is part of the prosecution team in this case."
Source
EFTA00019599.pdf
Quote #2
"The Government is providing materials stamped with control numbers SDNY_GM_02743189 through SDNY_GM_02743292 under separate cover."
Source
EFTA00019599.pdf
Quote #3
"We write in response to your March 8, 2021 letter, which requests the disclosure of: (1) documents produced to Radar Online... (2) 'any other FOIA requests...' and (3) 'any materials that reflect the involvement of the FBI-New York Office in the USAO-SDFL investigation.'"
Source
EFTA00019599.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (5,113 characters)

U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
March 29, 2021
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
Christian Everdell, Esq.
Mark Cohen, Esq.
Cohen & Gresser LLP
800 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Laura Menninger, Esq.
Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq.
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
150 East Tenth Avenue
Denver, CO 80203
Bobbi Sternheim, Esq.
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim
33 West 19th Street-4th Fl.
New York, NY 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Counsel:
We write in response to your March 8, 2021 letter, which requests the disclosure of:
(1) documents produced to Radar Online in the matter of Radar Online v. FBI, 17 Civ. 3956
(PGG); (2) “any other FOIA requests that have produced documents pertaining to any investigation
of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell”; and (3) “any materials that reflect the involvement of
the FBI-New York Office in the USAO-SDFL investigation.” We address each request in turn
below.
First, you have requested that we produce to you all materials that were produced to Radar
Online pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) in connection with the civil lawsuit
Radar Online v. FBI, 17 Civ. 3956 (PGG). As an initial matter, your letter fails to articulate any
legal basis for that request under Rule 16, or any other law governing criminal discovery.
Moreover, to the extent that you assert that you need to know when information received by Radar
Online through FOIA may have been published by the media, any information about the date of
publication would presumably be publicly available and, in any event, not information within the
Government’s possession, custody or control.
Page 2
Notwithstanding the above, we have been informed by an attorney in the General Counsel’s
Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation that all materials produced pursuant to the FOIA
request made in connection with Radar Online v. FBI, 17 Civ. 3956 (PGG) are publicly available
on the FBI’s website: https://vault.fbi.gov. Furthermore, and without conceding any obligation to
do so, as a courtesy, we will provide you with the cover letters that accompanied the productions
to Radar Online. The Government is providing materials stamped with control numbers
SDNY_GM_02743189 through SDNY_GM_02743292 under separate cover.
Second, you have requested that we search the files of the prosecution team¹ for “any other
FOIA requests that have produced documents pertaining to any investigation of Jeffrey Epstein or
Ghislaine Maxwell and produce to us the documents made public through the FOIA requests, the
dates the documents were produced and the identity of the recipient of the documents.” Your letter
offers no legal basis for this request, and in the absence of further explanation for your request, we
see none. FOIA concerns public disclosure of agency records; it has no bearing on whether
information is subject to discovery in criminal or civil cases. See, e.g., NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck &
Co., 421 U.S. 132, 143 n. 10 (1975) (“The Act is fundamentally designed to inform the public
about agency action and not to benefit private litigants.”). In particular, to the extent this request
seeks the identity of any individual or entity who made a FOIA request, along with corresponding
information about how the Government acted on such a request, we are unaware of any basis in
law for such a request, and we invite you to point us to such authority. To the extent this request
seeks materials produced in response to any FOIA request pertaining to any investigation of
Epstein, we are similarly unaware of any basis in law for such a broad request. Our discovery
obligations are not governed by FOIA but instead by Rule 16 and rules applicable to criminal
discovery, all of which we have complied with and intend to continue complying with fully.
Accordingly, we are not producing materials in response to your request at this juncture.
Third, you have requested that the Government “produce any materials that reflect the
involvement of the FBI-New York Office in the USAO-SDFL investigation.” In response, the
Government is providing materials stamped with control numbers SDNY_GM_02743143 through
SDNY_GM_02743188 in response to this request as a courtesy. This production should not be
taken to indicate that the Government believes it has any obligation, under Rule 16 or otherwise,
to do so; rather, we make this production as a courtesy in response to your request.
__________________
¹ Your letter erroneously asserts that the FBI’s Florida office is part of the prosecution team in this
case. We would direct you to our October 7, 2020 letter to the Court, in which we detailed the
entities that are part of this prosecution team.
Page 3
Finally, we have considered the concern you have raised regarding the language in our
October 7, 2020 letter and have filed a letter with the Court addressing the matter.
Very truly yours,
AUDREY STRAUSS
United States Attorney
by: /s [REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorneys

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document