Rodriguez
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Fear |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employer threat |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dave Lee Brannon
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
358 El Brillo Way
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the lawyer
|
Negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Dershowitz
|
Witness subject |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz's presence at the mansion | Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beac... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rodriguez cleaning Epstein's bedroom and sex toys after massages | Epstein's Bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Delivery of roses to a high school drama performance | [Mary's] High School | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Legal ruling | A ruling was made in the case Rodriguez v. Vill. Green Realty, Inc. | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2010-06-01 | N/A | Rodriguez sentenced to 18 months in prison. | N/A | View |
| 2005-11-14 | N/A | Rodriguez scheduled to return officer's call. | N/A | View |
| 2004-01-01 | N/A | Theft of the 'black book' | Epstein's residence | View |
| 0003-11-01 | N/A | Arrest of Rodriguez | Unknown meeting place | View |
| 0003-11-01 | N/A | Sting operation meeting | Unknown meeting place | View |
EFTA00017757.pdf
This document contains a roster of inmates and their corresponding registration numbers for various housing tiers (L, G, H, J, K, M). Jeffrey Epstein (Inmate 76318-054) is listed as being housed in L-Tier. The document serves as a snapshot of inmate housing assignments, likely within the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) New York.
EFTA00007747.pdf
This document set consists of evidence labels and a placeholder for a CD that was not scanned. The CD is labeled with 'PBPD Case # 05-368' and 'Prop # 05-1079', indicating it originates from the Palm Beach Police Department's 2005 investigation. The CD contains a 'Digital Voice Recording' with statements from an individual named Rodriguez and another redacted individual.
EFTA00002176.pdf
This document is a photograph of a prescription pill bottle held by a gloved hand, marked with evidence number EFTA00002176. The label shows the pharmacy name starting with 'Chelsea D' and the patient name 'RODRIGUEZ', followed by initials that appear to be 'AN' or 'AL'. Significant portions of the label, including the drug name and instructions, are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00008276.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 9, 2021, addresses the authentication and admissibility of Government Exhibit 52, described as a 'book' or 'household manual' belonging to Epstein and Maxwell. It discusses the defendant's challenge to Alessi's knowledge regarding the exhibit's origins and highlights the manual's contents, which detail practices and relationships between the defendant, Epstein, and other individuals. The document asserts that authentication does not require direct knowledge of creation or seizure, and chain of custody issues pertain to weight rather than admissibility.
DOJ-OGR-00000791.jpg
This document is Page 8 of a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, likely US v. Epstein) arguing the legal standards for pre-trial detention. It cites multiple Second Circuit precedents to establish that a defendant can be detained based on dangerousness to the community or risk of flight, noting that witness tampering is sufficient grounds to revoke bail. The text outlines the four factors of the Bail Reform Act required for the release/remand analysis.
DOJ-OGR-00000479.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically page 8 of 33 from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on July 18, 2019. It outlines the legal standards for a court to order a defendant's detention based on two separate grounds: dangerousness to the community and risk of flight. The text cites numerous legal precedents from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the Bail Reform Act to support its arguments regarding evidence standards and the factors a court must consider.
DOJ-OGR-00002235(1).jpg
This legal document, page 3 of a court filing from December 30, 2020, outlines the legal standard for pretrial detention. It discusses a defendant's right to bail under the Eighth Amendment and the Bail Reform Act, detailing the conditions under which a court can deny bail. The text explains the rebuttable presumption against release for certain offenses and clarifies the respective burdens of proof for the defendant and the government in such hearings, citing several precedent cases.
DOJ-OGR-00031222.jpg
A police dispatch log from November 28, 2004, recording a call from a Mr. Rodriguez regarding a suspicious vehicle at 358 El Brillo Way in Palm Beach. The caller, driving a black suburban from the police station, initially reported an unknown vehicle in the driveway but subsequently clarified at 19:21 that the vehicle belonged to company he was expecting. The document is part of a larger public records request (Page 49 of 135).
DOJ-OGR-00010478.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing, argues that the harsh conditions of incarceration during the COVID-19 pandemic should be considered a mitigating factor for sentencing. It cites multiple precedents from the Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) to support the claim that the pandemic, with its associated lockdowns and health risks, has made prison time significantly more punitive than under normal circumstances. The argument is made in the context of a defendant, Ms. Maxwell, to warrant a downward variance in her sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00002771.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 22, 2021, is a portion of a court filing discussing the legal standards for a defendant's bail motion. It outlines the rebuttable presumption of detention under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3), detailing the defendant's burden of production and the government's ultimate burden of persuasion. The document notes that the defendant has filed a third motion for bail, arguing for reconsideration based on new conditions and a purportedly weakened government case.
DOJ-OGR-00005417.jpg
This document is page 24 of a legal filing (Document 380) from October 29, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). The text is a legal argument citing multiple precedents (Boyle, Rodriguez, Hill, Watts, Carneglia) to support the exclusion of evidence related to the government's charging decisions. The argument asserts that such evidence is hearsay, irrelevant, and potentially confusing to jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00005824.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief filed by the Government on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government argues that it has provided sufficient and timely notice to the defense regarding Rule 404(b) evidence, citing the provision of extensive materials and relevant legal precedents. The brief refutes the defense's motion to preclude evidence based on claims of inadequate notice.
DOJ-OGR-00032886.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report from April 20, 2006, documents the ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It details police attempts to interview former employees Juan Alessi and Rodriguez, and communications with attorneys for both Alessi and Epstein. The report also contains a detailed narrative from a witness interviewed on November 14, 2005, who described being paid $300 per session to provide massages to a naked Epstein at his house on five or six occasions, coordinated by Epstein's assistant, Sarah.
DOJ-OGR-00005188.jpg
This document is a handwritten page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) containing legal arguments regarding statutes of limitations and definitions of sexual abuse. The author critiques the Fifth Circuit's interpretation of 18 USC statutes (specifically §3283, §3509, and §2251), arguing that procedural rules and statutes of limitations are not comparable and citing various case law precedents to support the argument. It concludes with a note about Biden's 1990 Senate bill S. 1965.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019200.jpg
This document appears to be a page from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') summarizing police evidence against Jeffrey Epstein. It details testimony from employee 'Rodriguez' regarding cleaning sex toys after massages, renting cars for high school girls, and delivering roses to a high school. It also discusses the subpoena of Sarah Kellen's phone records, which corroborated victim accounts of when encounters occurred.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019004.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details the ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in November 2005. Officer Recarey documents attempts to interview employees Juan Alessi (blocked by attorney) and Rodriguez, as well as coordination with Epstein's attorney, Guy Fronstin. A significant portion of the narrative describes a sworn statement from a redacted female witness who detailed giving naked massages to Epstein at his home, for which she was paid $300, noting she was recruited by others and summoned by Epstein's assistant.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022025.jpg
The document describes an attempt by Rodriguez to sell stolen information regarding Jeffrey Epstein, including lists of underage girls and famous contacts, to a lawyer for $50,000. The lawyer contacted the FBI, leading to a sting operation where Rodriguez met an undercover agent, admitted to possessing the stolen items, and was subsequently detained.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010558.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (stamped as a House Oversight exhibit) detailing an FBI sting operation against Alfredo Rodriguez, Jeffrey Epstein's former house manager. Rodriguez attempted to sell Epstein's 'little black book' and other sensitive documents containing names like Donald Trump, Ted Kennedy, and Mick Jagger to a lawyer for $50,000. On November 3 (year implied), Rodriguez met with an undercover FBI agent, exchanged the stolen book for the cash, and was immediately arrested for Obstruction of Official Proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010557.jpg
The text details an attempt by Rodriguez to sell stolen papers containing sensitive information about Jeffrey Epstein, including names of famous individuals and underage girls, for $50,000. Instead of paying, the lawyer he approached contacted the FBI, leading to a sting operation involving Special Agent Christina Pryor where Rodriguez was detained.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013439.jpg
A 2011 Daily Telegraph article (part of House Oversight records) details the sentencing of Epstein employee Rodriguez, who stole Epstein's 'black book' as an insurance policy against Epstein and Maxwell. The document quotes Rodriguez's lawyer stating Epstein's sentence might have been harsher had the book been found earlier, and mentions a defamation lawsuit Epstein filed against victim's lawyer Brad Edwards regarding a Ponzi scheme allegation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029769.jpg
This document is a printout of an investigative article by Conchita Sarnoff (The Daily Beast, 2010) bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It details Jeffrey Epstein's financial ties to alleged trafficker Jean Luc Brunel ($1M transfer), donations to the Palm Beach Police to curry favor, and the use of the MC2 modeling agency to lure minors. It also highlights flight logs listing unnamed 'females' and Epstein's defense of Brunel.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021948.jpg
This page is a rough draft of a legal deposition transcript, page 125. The dialogue concerns testimony given by witnesses Rodriguez and Alessi regarding Mr. Dershowitz's presence at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach mansion. The witness states that while Rodriguez testified Dershowitz was at the 'scene of the crime' (defined as the sex abuse of minor girls at the mansion), he did not indicate Dershowitz had direct knowledge of what occurred in the bedroom.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0003-11-01 | Received | FBI (UCE) | Rodriguez | $50,000.00 | Payment demanded by Rodriguez in exchange for E... | View |
Roses delivery
Direction to deliver a bucket of roses to [Mary's] High School after a drama performance
Testimony
Testified that Dershowitz was present at the scene but did not indicate direct knowledge of what happened in the bedroom.
Information about masseuses
Rodriguez stated he would return the officer's call on Monday, November 14, 2005, to speak about the masseuses at Epstein's house.
Scheduling interview
Rodriguez stated he would return call on Monday, Nov 14.
Statement of Rodriguez
Digital voice recording on CD, item was not scanned.
Payment for information
Lawyer told Rodriguez an associate would be in touch regarding payment.
Setting up a meeting
UCE calls Rodriguez to set up a meeting for the following day.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity