Kenric McDowell

Person

Mentions

8

Relationships

3

Events

3

Documents

3

Also known as:

Rachel Rose, Kenric McDowell McDowell

Search

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

3 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person Rachel Rose	Professional intellectual	6	1	View
person Rachel Rose	Professional conversational	5	1	View
person Rachel Rose	Acquaintance	5	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
N/A	N/A	Conversation at the Google Cultural Institute	Google Cultural Institute	View
N/A	N/A	Conversation between Rachel Rose, Kenric McDowell, and the narrator regarding AI and art.	Google Cultural Institute	View
N/A	N/A	Conversation at Google Cultural Institute regarding AI and art.	Google Cultural Institute	View

DOJ-OGR-00000041.tif

This document is a 'Table of Authorities—Continued' listing various legal cases, statutes, and rules. It includes multiple 'United States v. Maxwell' cases, one from 2024 and another from 2021, along with other cases like 'United States v. McDowell', 'United States v. O’Doherty', 'United States v. Rubbo', 'United States v. Transfiguracion', 'United States v. Van Thournout', 'United States v. Warner', and 'United States v. Williams', citing their legal references and page numbers within the larger document. It also lists relevant statutes (18 U.S.C. § 2255 and 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1)) and a rule (Fed. R. Civ. P. 35(b)).

Table of authorities (legal document)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016950.jpg

This document appears to be a page from an article or book discussing the intersection of art and artificial intelligence, specifically focusing on video artist Rachel Rose and engineer Kenric McDowell. It argues that computers cannot replace the human elements of empathy and mortality in the creative process, though they can serve as labor-saving tools. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a document production for a congressional investigation.

Article/essay excerpt (evidence document)

2025-11-19

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016367.jpg

This document appears to be a page (147) from a larger report or publication submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016367). It features an essay or article discussing the limitations of Artificial Intelligence in art, referencing video artist Rachel Rose and engineer Kenric McDowell of the Google Cultural Institute. While Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named on this page, the content aligns with the intellectual and tech-focused circles (such as MIT Media Lab) often associated with the Epstein investigation.

Article/essay (house oversight committee exhibit)

2025-11-19

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

0

As Recipient

3

Total

3

AI and Creativity

From: Unknown author

To: Kenric McDowell

Conversation regarding the role of AI in art and the differences between machine learning and human creativity.

Meeting

N/A

Communication Source

Art and AI

From: Rachel Rose

To: Kenric McDowell

A conversation regarding the artistic process, decision making, and the role of AI in creativity.

Meeting

N/A

Communication Source

Art and AI

From: Rachel Rose

To: Kenric McDowell

Discussion about the artistic process, decision making, and the role of AI.

Conversation

N/A

Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity