Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Supreme Court

Location
Mentions
22
Relationships
7
Events
56
Documents
10
Also known as:
Supreme Court (building) Supreme Court Building Supreme Court of Florida
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
7 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
Regulatory judicial
7
1
View
organization district court
Judicial hierarchy review
6
1
View
person kavanaugh
Nominee
6
1
View
person Justice Blackmun
Unknown
5
1
View
organization district court
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Justice Scalia
Membership
5
1
View
person Author
Employment
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Roe v. Wade US Supreme Court View
N/A Legal case The Supreme Court case Landgraf, cited as 511 U.S., which established a two-step analysis for det... N/A View
N/A Legal ruling The Supreme Court held that the WSLA was 'limited strictly to offenses in which defrauding or att... N/A View
N/A N/A Supreme Court grants review of the Tison case. Washington D.C. View
N/A Legal ruling The Supreme Court's ruling in Landgraf established a “presumption against statutory retroactivity”. N/A View
N/A N/A Supreme Court decision regarding the broadcasting of Carlin's routine on Pacifica radio. USA View
N/A Legal analysis Discussion and interpretation of the application of § 3283 statute of limitations, referencing Su... N/A View
N/A N/A Filing of petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court. Washington D.C. (implied) View
2025-04-10 Legal proceeding Maxwell petitioned for a writ of certiorari before the Supreme Court. N/A View
2019-06-27 N/A Supreme Court delivered a victory in a pair of decisions. Washington View
2016-01-01 N/A Williams v. Pennsylvania Court Decision USA View
2016-01-01 N/A Supreme Court case Williams v. Pennsylvania, addressing judicial bias. Pennsylvania View
2015-01-01 N/A Supreme Court decision in Johnson v. U.S. Supreme Court View
2014-01-01 N/A Supreme Court decision in Warger v. Shauers Supreme Court View
2013-06-26 N/A Date referenced regarding the Supreme Court's Windsor decision and tax filing periods. USA View
2013-06-26 N/A Supreme Court's Windsor decision (referenced in text as context for tax changes) Washington D.C. View
2013-06-26 N/A Supreme Court decision in Windsor v. United States United States View
2013-06-01 N/A Supreme Court's Windsor decision regarding DOMA Washington D.C. View
2013-06-01 N/A Supreme Court decision (Windsor) striking down DOMA, impacting tax laws for same-sex couples. Washington D.C. View
2013-01-01 N/A Supreme Court decision in Windsor striking down DOMA. USA View
2012-04-02 N/A Supreme Court review of affirmative action program Washington D.C. View
2009-01-01 N/A Supreme Court decision in Nijhawan v. Holder. Supreme Court View
2009-01-01 Legal case Decision in Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100. N/A View
2008-06-02 N/A Supreme Court decisions in United States v. Santos and Cuellar v. United States. Washington D.C. (implied) View
2007-01-01 N/A Supreme Court decision in James v. U.S. Supreme Court View

ACKNOWLEDGMENT%20LETTER-NEW%20CASE.pdf

This document is an official 'Acknowledgment of New Case' from the Supreme Court of Florida, dated December 11, 2015. It confirms the receipt of a 'Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction' filed on December 10, 2015, in the case of Jeffrey Epstein vs. Bradley J. Edwards (Case No. SC15-2286). The document lists relevant case numbers from the lower tribunal and copies various attorneys and clerks involved in the matter.

Legal correspondence / court notice
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017191.jpg

This document is page 104 of a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) recounting a Supreme Court oral argument regarding the film 'I Am Curious (Yellow).' The author details a contentious exchange with Chief Justice Warren Burger regarding a 'bear-baiting' analogy, harshly criticizing Burger's intelligence and judicial performance. The text also references the subsequent 'Miller v. California' decision in June 1973.

Manuscript draft / book excerpt (legal memoir)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017189.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of age 31 and Grove Press) discussing First Amendment law and obscenity cases. The text analyzes the legal implications of *Stanley v. Georgia* and *Roth v. United States* regarding private possession versus public distribution of obscene material. It concludes with a personal narrative about the author achieving a legal victory for Grove Press and subsequently arguing the appeal before the Supreme Court at age 31.

Legal memoir / book draft
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017155.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz given the biographical details) recounting a private conversation with Judge Bazelon. The text discusses the hidden influence J. Edgar Hoover held over liberal Supreme Court Justices, specifically alleging that Justices Goldberg and Marshall cooperated with Hoover's anti-communist agenda to secure their appointments. It further alleges Hoover possessed blackmail material on both men, specifically covering up a relationship between Goldberg and a potential Russian spy.

Manuscript draft / book excerpt (likely from an autobiography or memoir)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017154.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of clerking for Justice Goldberg in 1963-64) submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. It recounts anecdotes from the narrator's time as a Supreme Court clerk, including advising Justice Goldberg on Jewish law regarding head coverings and working on Yom Kippur, playing basketball with Justice White, and drafting the influential 'Escobedo' opinion regarding the right to counsel.

Memoir/manuscript excerpt (evidence file)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017148.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, indicated by biographical details such as his son Elon and clerkships) included in House Oversight materials. The text recounts the narrator's early legal career, specifically his clerkships with Judge David Bazelon and Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg. It details anecdotes regarding the narrator's Orthodox Jewish observance, including a confrontation with Simon Rifkind's law firm and accommodations made by Justice Goldberg, as well as a humorous incident involving his grandmother and young son visiting the Supreme Court.

Manuscript / memoir draft (page 61)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027458.jpg

This document is a digital communication log from the House Oversight Committee files, dated October 24, 2018. It captures a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and redacted individuals discussing news headlines regarding Donald Trump, Iran, the Supreme Court, and migrant caravans to be passed to an editor. The exchange concludes with Epstein inquiring about a trip to Paris involving 'FW' (possibly initials or Fashion Week).

Digital communication log / metadata export (likely imessage or similar)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028441.jpg

This document contains the underlying JSON data for a digital article by Rebecca Traister, titled "When the Muzzle Comes Off." Traister writes about the uncertainty surrounding Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination, speculating on various political outcomes while asserting with confidence that a significant, women-led social and political change is currently taking place.

Json data for an article
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028401.jpg

This document is a data snippet from a digital news article, likely from The New York Times around September 24, 2018, concerning the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh. It details the release of a letter from accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, a responsive letter from Senator Grassley, and the emergence of a new allegation from Deborah Ramirez published in The New Yorker. The text includes direct quotes from the correspondence and descriptions of the events as they unfolded.

Digital news article data snippet
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028400.jpg

This document is a news article, likely presented as a congressional exhibit, detailing the political response to sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh. It reports on Kavanaugh's planned Fox News interview to deny the claims, statements of support from Republicans like Senators Hatch and Cotton and President Trump, and the context of Christine Blasey Ford's allegations. The article also outlines the delicate political situation in the Senate, where a few key Republican votes will decide the confirmation outcome.

News article / congressional exhibit
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search