Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Matthew L. Schwartz

Person
Mentions
12
Relationships
7
Events
2
Documents
6
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
7 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person AUSA
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Redacted AUSAs
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Certain victims (Recruiters)
Legal representative
1
1
View
person EPSTEIN
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
person AUSAs (Redacted)
Professional
1
1
View
person Sigrid McCawley
Business associate
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2019-10-15 N/A Call/Meeting regarding forfeiture question Phone View
2019-10-13 N/A Matthew L. Schwartz requests a discussion regarding an Epstein-related forfeiture question. Email correspondence View

026-01.pdf

This document is Exhibit 1 filed in the case USVI v. JPMorgan Chase (related to Jeffrey Epstein), but the content is the January 2014 Deferred Prosecution Agreement between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and JPMorgan Chase regarding the Madoff Ponzi scheme. JPMorgan admitted to violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, specifically failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and failing to file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) in the U.S. despite having suspicions about Madoff's returns. The bank agreed to forfeit $1.7 billion to the United States.

Deferred prosecution agreement (dpa) and verified complaint
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

EFTA00029730.pdf

This document is an email thread from October 2019 between attorney Matthew L. Schwartz and redacted officials (likely from the US Attorney's Office). Schwartz requests a brief discussion regarding an 'Epstein-related forfeiture question,' clarifying that it is distinct from his firm's representation of 'certain victims.' The thread involves scheduling logistics and identifies (though names are redacted) three specific AUSAs as the 'Epstein case team.'

Email thread
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00021344.pdf

A letter dated October 15, 2019, from Matthew L. Schwartz of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to an Assistant US Attorney. Schwartz informs the government that his client intends to purchase a Sikorsky S-76C helicopter for $3.5 million from Hyperion Air, LLC, a USVI entity associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The letter notes that Darren K. Indyke represents the seller and seeks confirmation that the government does not intend to block the sale or seize the asset.

Legal correspondence / letter
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00021341.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 2019 between attorney Matthew L. Schwartz and the Assistant United States Attorneys (AUSAs) prosecuting the Epstein case. Schwartz, who notes he represents certain victims, contacts the prosecutors regarding a separate 'forfeiture-related question' specifically concerning 'Hyperion Air' (Epstein's aviation company). The correspondence culminates in Schwartz attaching a letter detailing information about Hyperion Air.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00021337.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 2019 between attorney Matthew L. Schwartz and members of the US Attorney's Office. Schwartz requests a discussion regarding an 'Epstein-related forfeiture question,' clarifying that it is separate from his firm's representation of victims. A respondent identifies three (redacted) AUSAs as the 'Epstein case team' responsible for such inquiries, and a call is subsequently scheduled.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00021161.pdf

An email chain from October 13, 2019, initiated by attorney Matthew L. Schwartz requesting a discussion about an 'Epstein-related forfeiture question.' The recipients discuss internally who Schwartz represents, noting his firm's connection to Florida-based partner Sigrid McCawley and debating whether to direct him to the 'case team.'

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
12
As Recipient
6
Total
18

Re: Hyperion Air, LLC

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: AUSA

Informing the US Attorney's Office of a pending helicopter purchase from an Epstein-linked entity (Hyperion Air) to check for forfeiture issues.

Letter/email
2019-10-15
Communication Source

Discussion regarding Hyperion Air transaction

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: AUSA

Conversation regarding the Hyperion Air transaction referred to in the letter.

Call/meeting
2019-10-15
Communication Source

RE: Forfeiture question

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: REDACTED

I just freed up and can call you in a few minutes if that works.

Email
2019-10-15
Communication Source

RE: Forfeiture question

From: REDACTED
To: Matthew L. Schwartz

Scheduling conflict (witness meeting), proposing new times.

Email
2019-10-15
Communication Source

RE: Forfeiture question

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: [REDACTED]

Attaching letter re: Hyperion Air following a phone conversation.

Email
2019-10-15
Communication Source

RE: Forfeiture question

From: [REDACTED]
To: Matthew L. Schwartz

Providing desk number for call.

Email
2019-10-15
Communication Source

RE: Forfeiture question

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: [REDACTED]

Stating he is free to call in a few minutes.

Email
2019-10-15
Communication Source

RE: Forfeiture question

From: [REDACTED]
To: Matthew L. Schwartz

Rescheduling call due to witness meeting.

Email
2019-10-15
Communication Source

Re: Forfeiture question

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: REDACTED

4:30 is perfect. Where should I call?

Email
2019-10-14
Communication Source

Re: Forfeiture question

From: [REDACTED]
To: Matthew L. Schwartz

Identifying the Epstein case team (3 redacted AUSAs) as the correct points of contact.

Email
2019-10-13
Communication Source

Re: Forfeiture question

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: [REDACTED]

Clarifying the inquiry has nothing to do with his firm's representation of victims.

Email
2019-10-13
Communication Source

Forfeiture question

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: [REDACTED]

Inquiry about a time-sensitive Epstein-related forfeiture question.

Email
2019-10-13
Communication Source

Re: Forfeiture question

From: [REDACTED]
To: Matthew L. Schwartz

Identifying the Epstein case team AUSAs.

Email
2019-10-13
Communication Source

Re: Forfeiture question

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: [REDACTED]

Initial inquiry regarding an 'Epstein-related forfeiture question'.

Email
2019-10-13
Communication Source

Re: Forfeiture question

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: REDACTED

Clarifying the question is forfeiture-related and unrelated to his firm's representation of certain victims.

Email
2019-10-13
Communication Source

Re: Forfeiture question

From: REDACTED
To: Matthew L. Schwartz

Identifying the Epstein case team AUSAs and CCing them.

Email
2019-10-13
Communication Source

Epstein-related forfeiture question

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: [REDACTED]

Inquiry about a time-sensitive Epstein-related forfeiture question.

Email
2019-10-13
Communication Source

Forfeiture question

From: Matthew L. Schwartz
To: REDACTED

Initial inquiry requesting 2 minutes to discuss an Epstein-related forfeiture question.

Email
2019-10-13
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search