EFTA00021337.pdf

118 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 118 KB
Summary

This document is an email chain from October 2019 between attorney Matthew L. Schwartz and members of the US Attorney's Office. Schwartz requests a discussion regarding an 'Epstein-related forfeiture question,' clarifying that it is separate from his firm's representation of victims. A respondent identifies three (redacted) AUSAs as the 'Epstein case team' responsible for such inquiries, and a call is subsequently scheduled.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Matthew L. Schwartz Attorney/Sender
Seeking information regarding an Epstein-related forfeiture question. Mentions his firm represents 'certain victims'.
Jeffrey Epstein Subject
Mentioned in context of 'Epstein case team' and 'Epstein-related forfeiture question'.
AUSAs (Redacted) Prosecutors/Government Attorneys
Three redacted individuals identified as the 'Epstein case team' responsible for handling Epstein-related inquiries.
[Redacted Respondent] Government Official
Initial recipient of Schwartz's email who directs him to the specific AUSAs handling the Epstein case.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice / USAO
Implied by the reference to 'AUSAs' (Assistant United States Attorneys).
Matthew L. Schwartz's Firm
Mentioned as representing 'certain victims'.

Timeline (1 events)

2019-10-15
Call/Meeting regarding forfeiture question
Phone
Matthew L. Schwartz [Redacted AUSA]

Relationships (2)

Matthew L. Schwartz Adversarial/Legal Jeffrey Epstein
Schwartz mentions his firm represents 'certain victims' and is asking about forfeiture.
Matthew L. Schwartz Professional AUSAs (Redacted)
Schwartz coordinating a call with the Epstein case team regarding forfeiture.

Key Quotes (3)

"The Epstein case team are AUSAs [Redacted], [Redacted] and [Redacted]... They’re the right people to talk to about anything Epstein-related."
Source
EFTA00021337.pdf
Quote #1
"FYI, this has nothing to do with my firm’s representation of certain victims."
Source
EFTA00021337.pdf
Quote #2
"Do either of you guys or the appropriate other person have 2 minutes to discuss a somewhat time-sensitive, but by no means urgent, Epstein-related forfeiture question"
Source
EFTA00021337.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,399 characters)

From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Forfeiture question
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:33:55 +0000
Sorry, was in a meeting. How’d it go?
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 2:06 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: FW: Forfeiture question
On the phone with him now—you’re welcome to swing by, but it seems like this will be super short, so no worries.
From: Matthew L. Schwartz <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 1:56 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Forfeiture question
I just freed up and can call you in a few minutes if that works.
Matthew L. Schwartz
[REDACTED] (o)
[REDACTED] (m)
On October 15, 2019 at 1:39:21 PM EDT, [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Matt,
With apologies: I now need to meet with a witness starting at 4 today, so unfortunately 4:30 no longer works.
Happy to talk between now and 4, or later this evening, if either works. Alternatively, I’m free at 9:30
tomorrow morning, or between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. tomorrow.
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
From: Matthew L. Schwartz <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 9:10 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: Forfeiture question
4:30 is perfect. Where should I call?
EFTA00021337
Matthew L. Schwartz
[REDACTED] (o)
[REDACTED] (m)
On October 14, 2019 at 6:40:46 PM EDT, [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Hi Matt,
I’m available for a call tomorrow either at 1 p.m. or anytime from 4:30 onwards, if either of those windows
works for you.
Best,
[REDACTED]
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 13, 2019, at 8:23 PM, Matthew L. Schwartz <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Thanks [REDACTED]. If any of you have a moment for a forfeiture-related question in the next few days, please let
me know. FYI, this has nothing to do with my firm’s representation of certain victims. Thanks.
-mls
Matthew L. Schwartz
[REDACTED] (o)
[REDACTED] (m)
On October 13, 2019 at 7:44:17 PM EDT, [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Hi Matt,
The Epstein case team are AUSAs [REDACTED], [REDACTED] and [REDACTED], all cc’d on this
email. They’re the right people to talk to about anything Epstein-related.
[REDACTED]
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 13, 2019, at 2:59 PM, Matthew L. Schwartz <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Do either of you guys or the appropriate other person have 2 minutes to discuss a somewhat time-
sensitive, but by no means urgent, Epstein-related forfeiture question in the next few days?
Matthew L. Schwartz
[REDACTED] (o)
[REDACTED] (m)
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only
for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other
protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this
communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this
EFTA00021338
communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic
message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1 08201831BSF]
EFTA00021339

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document