Stein
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Stein
|
Co authors |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case: United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d 130 | U.S. Court of Appeals for t... | View |
| 2004-01-01 | N/A | Stein bid against Trump's 43,000-square-foot property for $41.35 million, which Trump rejected. | N/A | View |
| 1972-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case: United States v. Stein, 456 F.2d 844 | U.S. Court of Appeals for t... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001789.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated October 7, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The text outlines legal precedents determining the scope of the 'prosecution team' for discovery purposes (Rule 16 and Brady), arguing that the prosecution is not obligated to produce records from other government agencies (like the SEC or components of the DOJ/FBI) unless a specific 'joint investigation' occurred. It cites various cases (Middendorf, Collins, Stein) to establish the criteria for what constitutes a joint investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00022099.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 36) from June 9, 2020, associated with Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines legal standards associated with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 regarding discovery obligations, specifically defining 'materiality' of evidence and what constitutes government 'possession, custody, or control.' It relies on legal precedents such as US v. Ulbricht, US v. Abdalla, and US v. Stein to argue the scope of evidence the government must produce.
DOJ-OGR-00022085.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a brief or motion, dated April 24, 2020. It argues that the involvement of agents from a government agency in an investigation does not automatically make the entire agency part of the "prosecution team" for discovery purposes. The text cites several legal precedents (Stein, Pelullo, Locascio, Ghailani, and Middendorf) to outline the factors courts use to determine the scope of the prosecution team and its disclosure obligations under Rule 16.
DOJ-OGR-00022067.jpg
This document is page 5 of a 34-page legal filing (Document 35 in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT), filed on April 24, 2020. It serves as a table of authorities, listing numerous legal cases cited within the main document, such as United States v. Payne and United States v. Pelullo. Each entry includes the full legal citation and the page number(s) where the case is referenced in the filing.
DOJ-OGR-00022036.jpg
This document is a legal filing on behalf of a defendant, Mr. Thomas, arguing for the disclosure of evidence related to his criminal charges. The defense contends that rampant staffing shortages and mismanagement by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) forced the defendant to engage in the alleged conduct. To support this claim, the filing references an attached memorandum from a union meeting that occurred just three days before Jeffrey Epstein's death at the same facility in August 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00022026.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on April 9, 2020. It lists numerous court cases used as legal precedent, with the majority being criminal cases where the 'United States' is a party against various individuals. The cases cited span from 1963 to 2007 and originate from various federal courts across the country.
DOJ-OGR-00002957.jpg
This document is page xxii of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 204), filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal cases from 'United States v. Schafrick' to 'United States v. Swanson,' along with their legal citations and the page numbers where they are referenced within the main document. The cases cited span from 1972 to 2015 and originate from various federal district and circuit courts.
DOJ-OGR-00005762.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a motion arguing to exclude evidence of an alleged rape committed by Mr. Epstein from the trial of Ms. Maxwell. The argument posits that such evidence is not part of the charged conspiracy (which is limited to securing "sexualized massages"), is highly inflammatory and unduly prejudicial, and would confuse the jury, leading to a conviction on an improper emotional basis. The document cites several legal precedents to support the exclusion of this evidence under Rule 403.
DOJ-OGR-00005759.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the legal precedents cited in the main document, including various U.S. court cases, U.S. Constitutional Amendments V and VI, and Federal Rules of Evidence 401, 402, and 403. The page is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00005759.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013717.jpg
This document is page 217 of a scientific paper discussing chaos theory, nonlinear dynamics, and time series reconstruction. It references mathematical concepts such as the Poincaré surface of section, attractors, and bifurcations, citing various researchers (Liebert, Oseledec, Coffman, Zimmerman, Rapp) with dates ranging from 1968 to 1991. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013717' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, though the text itself is purely academic.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Stein | Donald Trump | $41,350,000.00 | Bid rejected by Trump | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity