Ethel Rosenberg
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Greenglass
|
Familial |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Rosenberg trial, after which many believed Ethel Rosenberg was innocent. | N/A | View |
| 1953-01-01 | Execution | The execution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. | N/A | View |
| 1951-01-01 | Trial | The trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, where they were convicted and sentenced to death. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00015092.jpg
This legal document discusses precedents for unsealing grand jury testimony of historical significance. It cites the case of David Greenglass, whose testimony in the Rosenberg trial was released after his death, and the case of Alger Hiss, where grand jury transcripts from an espionage investigation were unsealed after fifty years due to public interest.
DOJ-OGR-00015091.jpg
This legal document argues against the release of grand jury transcripts in the pending case of Maxwell. The author contends that secrecy is necessary to protect still-living witnesses, including active law enforcement personnel and alleged victims. The document also refutes the government's cited precedent, the Rosenberg case, arguing it is inapplicable because it involved a decades-old, concluded case, unlike Maxwell's ongoing one.
DOJ-OGR-00015156.jpg
This document is page 24 of a court filing (likely an order or opinion) in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text discusses a legal analysis regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials, weighing the defendant's (Maxwell) opposition against the public interest. The Court concludes that the specific factor of 'public interest' weighs decisively against unsealing because the materials consist of summary testimony by law enforcement that is already public record due to the trial, and lacks the historical significance found in cases like the Rosenbergs or Alger Hiss.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017370.jpg
The author recounts interactions with Woody Allen and Mia Farrow, starting with discussions on film and politics, specifically the Rosenberg trial. The narrative shifts dramatically when Mia Farrow calls the author to allege that Woody Allen is abusing her children, leading the author and his wife to visit Farrow's home in Connecticut where they learn details of allegations involving Soon-Yi and Dylan.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017105.jpg
This page appears to be an excerpt from a memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, based on the biographical details of growing up in Boro Park during the McCarthy era) marked as a House Oversight exhibit. The text recounts the narrator's childhood experiences with 'subversive' books, signing a petition to save the Rosenbergs which resulted in punishment from his parents, and visiting the library with friend Artie Edelman to impress girls. It also references the narrator's later life interactions with his granddaughter regarding Classic Comics.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity