DOJ-OGR-00015091.jpg

732 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 732 KB
Summary

This legal document argues against the release of grand jury transcripts in the pending case of Maxwell. The author contends that secrecy is necessary to protect still-living witnesses, including active law enforcement personnel and alleged victims. The document also refutes the government's cited precedent, the Rosenberg case, arguing it is inapplicable because it involved a decades-old, concluded case, unlike Maxwell's ongoing one.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the legal case, whose legal and reputational interests are at stake regarding grand jury materials from he...
Julius Rosenberg Defendant in a cited case
Mentioned as the subject of a decades-old grand jury proceeding related to espionage.
Ethel Rosenberg Defendant in a cited case
Mentioned as the subject of a decades-old grand jury proceeding related to espionage.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
FBI Government agency
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, where law enforcement witnesses who testified before the grand jury remain active.
NYPD Government agency
The New York Police Department, where law enforcement witnesses who testified before the grand jury remain active.
National Security Archive Non-profit
A non-profit organization whose petition in a previous case (In re Petition of National Security Archive) is cited.
MARKUS/MOSS Law firm
Appears in the footer of the document, likely the law firm that authored the filing.

Timeline (4 events)

1951
The trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, where they were convicted and sentenced to death.
1953
The execution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.
2015
A motion by a non-profit (National Security Archive) regarding the Rosenberg grand jury proceeding.
S.D.N.Y.
Maxwell's trial, during which certain aspects of the grand jury transcript became public.
Maxwell The government

Locations (1)

Location Context
The Southern District of New York, mentioned in a legal citation (S.D.N.Y. 2015).

Relationships (1)

Maxwell Adversarial (legal) The government
The document outlines a legal dispute between Maxwell's counsel and the government regarding the disclosure of grand jury materials in her criminal case.

Key Quotes (2)

"aspects and subject matters of the transcript became public during Maxwell’s trial"
Source
— The government's memorandum (A statement from the government's memorandum cited in the document to argue that while some information is public, Maxwell has not seen the full materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00015091.jpg
Quote #1
"many"
Source
— The government's memorandum (Used to describe the number of complaining witnesses who are still alive, as disclosed in the government's memorandum.)
DOJ-OGR-00015091.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,872 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 803 Filed 08/05/25 Page 5 of 9
when Maxwell’s legal and reputational interests are at stake. These factors weigh heavily in favor of preserving the secrecy of the grand jury materials.
Although the government’s memorandum sets forth that certain “aspects and subject matters of the transcript became public during Maxwell’s trial,” Maxwell has never had an opportunity to review the entirety of the grand jury materials in her case. Dkt 796 at 7. The government provided a list to the Court, under seal, of witnesses whose accounts were conveyed in the grand jury and a corresponding list noting which witnesses testified at trial. That list has not been disclosed to us. The government’s memorandum, however, acknowledges that the law enforcement witnesses who testified before the grand jury are alive and remain active in the FBI and NYPD respectively. The government’s memorandum also disclosed that “many” of the complaining witnesses, who formed the subject matter of the grand jury witnesses’ testimony, are also alive. Dkt. 796 at 8. This factor likewise counsels against disclosure of the grand jury transcripts given the need to protect both active law enforcement personnel and alleged victims.
III. THERE IS NO PRECEDENT SUPPORTING RELEASE OF GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS IN A PENDING CASE LIKE THIS ONE
None of the cases cited by the government justify disclosure here. In re Petition of National Security Archive involved a decades-old grand jury proceeding against Julius and Ethel Rosenberg relating to charges of conspiracy to commit espionage by providing information about the atomic bomb to Soviet agents. 104 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). In 1951, the Rosenbergs were tried, convicted, and sentenced to death. They were executed in 1953. Id. In 2015, upon a motion by a non-profit
MARKUS/MOSS
5
DOJ-OGR-00015091

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document