This legal document argues against the release of grand jury transcripts in the pending case of Maxwell. The author contends that secrecy is necessary to protect still-living witnesses, including active law enforcement personnel and alleged victims. The document also refutes the government's cited precedent, the Rosenberg case, arguing it is inapplicable because it involved a decades-old, concluded case, unlike Maxwell's ongoing one.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the legal case, whose legal and reputational interests are at stake regarding grand jury materials from he...
|
| Julius Rosenberg | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned as the subject of a decades-old grand jury proceeding related to espionage.
|
| Ethel Rosenberg | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned as the subject of a decades-old grand jury proceeding related to espionage.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI | Government agency |
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, where law enforcement witnesses who testified before the grand jury remain active.
|
| NYPD | Government agency |
The New York Police Department, where law enforcement witnesses who testified before the grand jury remain active.
|
| National Security Archive | Non-profit |
A non-profit organization whose petition in a previous case (In re Petition of National Security Archive) is cited.
|
| MARKUS/MOSS | Law firm |
Appears in the footer of the document, likely the law firm that authored the filing.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The Southern District of New York, mentioned in a legal citation (S.D.N.Y. 2015).
|
"aspects and subject matters of the transcript became public during Maxwell’s trial"Source
"many"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,872 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document