| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
FBI
|
Inter agency cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Custodial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Custody |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
MCC New York
|
Custodial |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-15 | N/A | Evidence Review Day 3 | 500 Pearl Street, 5th Floor | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Evidence Review Day 2 | 500 Pearl Street, 5th Floor | View |
| 2021-04-13 | N/A | Scheduled start of evidence review by Ghislaine Maxwell at 500 Pearl Street. | 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY | View |
| 2021-04-13 | N/A | Evidence review by Maxwell and defense team at 500 Pearl Street. | 500 Pearl Street, 5th Floor | View |
| 2021-04-13 | N/A | Evidence review session for Ghislaine Maxwell and her defense team. | 500 Pearl Street, 5th Floor... | View |
| 2021-04-13 | N/A | Evidence Review Day 1 | 500 Pearl Street, 5th Floor | View |
| 2021-04-13 | N/A | Evidence review for Ghislaine Maxwell case | 500 Pearl Street, 5th Floor... | View |
| 2019-08-16 | N/A | Scheduled Proffer Session | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Distribution of a letter from Judge Richard M. Berman regarding Jeffrey Epstein case 19 cr 490. | New York | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Epstein returned from court to MCC R&D and signed a form with US Marshals. | MCC New York (R&D) | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Court Status Hearing | Court | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Report received from Bureau of Prisons MCC New York. | MCC New York | View |
This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, dated July 2, 2020. It notifies recipients of a scheduled Removal Hearing via Video Conference for Ghislaine Maxwell, set for 3:30 PM that day before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. The notice lists various Department of Justice and US Marshal personnel as recipients.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) involving a procedural discussion between the Judge, Defense Counsel Ms. Menninger, and Prosecutor Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on how to handle a witness who intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment and another witness who refused to communicate with the defense. The Judge expresses frustration with potential delays, stating the issue needs to be resolved immediately ('happen yesterday').
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge schedules a charging conference for 'Saturday the 18th' and ensures Ghislaine Maxwell's presence. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises an issue regarding the defense case, stating that potential witnesses are requesting to testify anonymously or under name protection (pseudonyms).
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, likely relating to the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details a discussion regarding courthouse COVID-19 mask mandates (N95/KN95) and the handling of jury notes during deliberations. Specifically, the jury requested a transcript for 'Parkinson' (Court Exhibit 13) and had previously received supplies and a transcript for 'Matt'.
This document appears to be a page from a legal review or oversight report concerning the Jeffrey MacDonald murder case ('Fatal Vision'). It details allegations of prosecutorial misconduct where prosecutor James Blackburn allegedly threatened witness Helena Stoeckley to suppress her confession of being present at the murder scene. It highlights that former Deputy Marshall Jim Britt came forward in 2005 to corroborate this suppression of evidence. NOTE: While the user requested 'Epstein-related' analysis, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein; it deals exclusively with the Jeffrey MacDonald case, though it bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
The document is a conspiratorial narrative linking the suspicious death of Justice Scalia to broader 'murder ops' and corporate corruption involving SAIC, Tetra Tech, and government contracts. It details the career movements of Bud and Sue Horton between IBM, Accenture, and Tetra Tech, alleging their involvement in securing billion-dollar contracts with the State Department and DoD that purportedly facilitated the Afghan heroin trade. The text also references the 'Franklin Scandal' and criticizes the lack of autopsy for Justice Scalia.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity