EDNY
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
USAO-SDNY
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
EFTA00032314.pdf
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between attorney Bruce Barket and prosecutors at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). Barket, representing Nicholas Tartaglione (Epstein's cellmate), discusses scheduling a status conference for March 4th and notes that his firm possesses 'information, documents, emails' that may be relevant to the prosecutors' needs. The emails also mention a 'Curcio issue' and coordination with Judge Karas.
EFTA00030386.pdf
This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Bureau of Prisons/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's initial custody conditions from July 6 to July 13, 2020. The correspondence coordinates urgent legal calls for Maxwell ahead of deadlines set by Judge Nathan and her arraignment, with BOP officials noting she is receiving more access than typical inmates. The chain concludes with the prosecution seeking confirmation that Maxwell is housed in a single cell separated from other inmates for security reasons to include in a public filing.
EFTA00029443.pdf
An internal email from a Deputy Chief Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of New York (EDNY) dated February 22, 2019. The email discusses a recent opinion by a district judge in Miami regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically noting that the U.S. Attorney's Office violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by entering a non-prosecution agreement without notifying victims. The sender advises EDNY staff to be mindful of CVRA obligations and victim notification in their own plea negotiations to avoid similar issues.
EFTA00028155.pdf
This document is an email chain dated July 18, 2019, circulating a New York Times breaking news alert that Jeffrey Epstein was denied bail. The participants, whose names are redacted, discuss the news with positive sentiment ('Congratulations') and coordinate the retrieval of related legal filings from the EDNY, specifically mentioning 'Boustani appellate filing(s)'.
EFTA00026658.pdf
This document is an email thread between Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Eastern District of New York (EDNY) and the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated July 9, 2019. The EDNY attorney reports that a potential witness in the Epstein case called their office the previous day, refusing to speak to the FBI and specifically requesting the U.S. Attorney's Office. The matter and an attached memorandum of the call were referred to the SDNY for follow-up.
EFTA00024788.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 6-10, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and MDC staff regarding the scheduling of legal calls for Ghislaine Maxwell immediately following her arrest. The correspondence highlights urgent requests for access due to court deadlines set by Judge Nathan, the establishment of a standing 10 AM daily call schedule leading up to her arraignment on July 14, and some friction regarding whether defense counsel was following proper protocols for requesting calls.
EFTA00024437.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and prison officials (MDC) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell immediately following her arrest on July 6, 2020. The correspondence coordinates urgent legal calls for Maxwell to meet a court deadline set by Judge Nathan and establishes a schedule for daily standing calls with her defense counsel, Mr. Everdell, leading up to her arraignment on July 14, 2020. There is some friction regarding whether defense counsel followed proper protocols for requesting calls, with prison officials defending their responsiveness.
EFTA00023753.pdf
This document is an email dated June 11, 2020, from an Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) in the Eastern District of New York (EDNY). The prosecutor is investigating an inmate death at Brooklyn MDC and requests a copy of the confidentiality agreement the Office of Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) signed regarding the 'investigation into the murder of Jeffrey Epstein.' The use of the word 'murder' instead of 'suicide' in an official correspondence regarding Epstein's death is a notable anomaly.
EFTA00019063.pdf
An email chain from February 24, 2020, between attorney Bruce Barket and DOJ officials regarding a scheduling conflict for a status conference involving Mr. Tartaglione (likely Nicholas Tartaglione, Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate). Barket informs the prosecution that his request for a day off from a trial in the EDNY was denied, complicating his attendance at the Tartaglione conference where a 'Curcio issue' is to be addressed. The DOJ officials discuss consulting with 'Bobbi' before responding.
EFTA00018546.pdf
An email thread from February 2020 between attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). Barket discusses scheduling conflicts regarding a status conference for his client, Mr. Tartaglione (Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate), due to a trial in the EDNY. The correspondence mentions a 'Curcio issue' related to the case.
EFTA00018130.pdf
An email chain between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and another official regarding protocols for interviewing inmates. The discussion references the 'MCC case' and includes an attachment specifically titled 'Hammad_Memo_-_Epstein_Death_Investigation.msg', indicating the conversation concerns the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondence details the use of 'Hammad memos' to authorize agents to interview inmates without counsel present.
EFTA00015957.pdf
This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Bureau of Prisons/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell shortly after her arrest in July 2020. Key topics include scheduling urgent legal calls for her defense counsel (Mr. Everdell) ahead of deadlines and her arraignment, establishing a standing 10:00 AM call schedule, and confirming her housing conditions (solitary cell and separate exercise) for court filings. BOP officials note that Maxwell was receiving significantly more legal access (2-hour afternoon calls plus morning calls) than typical inmates.
EFTA00015951.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 6-11, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and prison officials (MDC) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell shortly after her arrest. The emails coordinate urgent legal calls between Maxwell and her defense counsel (specifically Mr. Everdell) ahead of court deadlines and her arraignment scheduled for July 14, 2020. There is discussion regarding a 'standing legal call' at 10:00 AM and adherence to EDNY/SDNY protocols for scheduling inmate calls.
DOJ-OGR-00021946.jpg
This document outlines the additional conditions of release for a defendant in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (filed Nov 19, 2019). Conditions include a $100,000 bond co-signed by two people, travel restrictions limited to NY/NJ/PA districts, surrender of travel documents, pretrial supervision (PTS), mental health evaluation, and a strict prohibition on contacting the co-defendant without counsel present. The defendant was to be released on their own signature with remaining conditions to be met by Nov 26, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00021945.jpg
This document is a court order (Form AO 199B) filed on November 19, 2019, outlining additional conditions of release for a defendant involved in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. The conditions mandate pretrial supervision, the surrender of passports, travel restrictions limited to NY, NJ, and Eastern PA, a prohibition on firearms, and a requirement for mental health evaluation and treatment.
DOJ-OGR-00021838.jpg
This legal document analyzes court precedent regarding whether a plea agreement in one federal district binds prosecutors in another. It argues that the 'Annabi rule' has been sharply criticized and was based on a misreading of prior cases from the Second Circuit, specifically Abbamonte, Alessi, and Papa. The document suggests that the precedent set by these earlier cases does not support the broad interpretation applied in Annabi.
DOJ-OGR-00021837.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated November 1, 2024. It analyzes the legal precedent of *Annabi* (771 F.2d 671), focusing on whether a plea agreement made with the US Attorney's Office in the Eastern District of New York (EDNY) prevents prosecution by the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The text highlights the Second Circuit's ruling that despite being counterintuitive, an agreement to dismiss counts by one district's prosecutor did not bind the United States from prosecuting in another district. This legal argument is likely being cited in the broader context of the Epstein case to discuss the validity and scope of Non-Prosecution Agreements across different federal districts.
DOJ-OGR-00005209.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 13, 2021. It presents legal arguments justifying the use of jury questionnaires to screen for bias (actual, implied, and inferred) during voir dire. The text cites precedents from the Second Circuit and references other high-profile cases involving extensive pretrial publicity, such as those of Jeffrey Skilling (Enron), R. Kelly, Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos), and Keith Rainier (Nexium), to support the argument.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031561.jpg
An email thread from July 2018 between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney David Schoen. They discuss the Robert Mueller investigation, with Schoen offering harsh criticisms of prosecutors Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, while Epstein compares the bias of FBI agent Peter Strzok to mob prosecutors. Schoen also mentions media coverage tying Epstein to Donald Trump and the #MeToo movement, expressing regret that he was not chosen to help Epstein with his legal defense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031560.jpg
An email chain from July 4, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation) and attorney David Schoen. They discuss the Mueller investigation, specifically criticizing Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe, and Andrew Weissmann for alleged political bias and misconduct. Schoen provides a detailed anecdote accusing Weissmann of unethical behavior in the EDNY.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026291.jpg
This document is an email exchange from July 4, 2018, originating from a House Oversight collection. Attorney David Schoen writes to Jeffrey Epstein, harshly criticizing the composition of Robert Mueller's special counsel team, alleging specific members like Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, and Greg Andres have a history of prosecutorial misconduct and extreme anti-Trump/pro-Clinton bias. Epstein replies briefly, questioning if Schoen's concerns are 'overblown' and drawing parallels to other prosecutors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026288.jpg
This document is an email chain from July 2018 between Jeffrey Epstein (using 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and lawyer David I. Schoen. Schoen provides commentary on various legal and political figures he alleges are biased (Jeannie Rhee, Greg Andres), while Epstein asks questions comparing prosecutors. Schoen also expresses sympathy for the negative press and legal troubles Epstein is facing, mentioning an article connecting him to '#metoo' and Trump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026287.jpg
This document is an email chain from July 4, 2018, involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and an unidentified correspondent. The correspondent refers to Alan Dershowitz as Epstein's 'friend' and heavily criticizes the Mueller investigation, accusing team member Andrew Weissmann of being a 'Pathological Liar' and alleging that officials Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe conspired to stop Donald Trump from becoming president. Epstein's reply discusses the nature of Strzok's testimony and questions about prosecutorial bias.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity