Carolyn
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Melissa Ong
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kristen
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Spouse |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Criminal defendant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Narrator and wife drive to Connecticut to meet Mia Farrow regarding abuse allegations. | Connecticut | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner at Savoir Faire Restaurant | Savoir Faire Restaurant, Ed... | View |
| N/A | Jury instruction | Instruction No. 27 was given to a jury, detailing the second element of Count Six: Sex Traffickin... | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding a complaint (Exhibit C5) ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018783.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a complaint (Exhibit C5) where Carolyn made a claim against a Mr. Epstein; Carolyn now states that the complaint, which she previously testified under oath was accurate, was in fact not accurate. Mr. Pagliuca also establishes that a specific paragraph of the complaint does not contain the name "Maxwell."
DOJ-OGR-00019164.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness named Chapell, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on invoices for two shipments sent by 'G. Maxwell' in December 2002, establishing the recipients as Laura Casey Wasserman and Danny Hillis. The attorney also confirms that the recipients were not named Carolyn or Cardine and begins to question the absence of a transaction involving 'Ghislaine Maxwell' on an invoice.
DOJ-OGR-00014487.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court summation given by Ms. Menninger, likely the defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that the testimonies of accusers like Carolyn, Jane, and Annie are unreliable because their memories have been manipulated and have changed over time. She suggests this shift is motivated by a desire to hold someone accountable for the deceased Jeffrey Epstein's actions and cites expert testimony from Professor Loftus to support her claim about the nature of memory.
DOJ-OGR-00008655.jpg
This legal document is a jury instruction (Instruction No. 27) from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 18, 2021. It specifies the second element of Count Six, 'Sex Trafficking of an Individual Under the Age of 18,' requiring the Government to prove that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, knew the victim, Carolyn, was under eighteen years old.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017370.jpg
The author recounts interactions with Woody Allen and Mia Farrow, starting with discussions on film and politics, specifically the Rosenberg trial. The narrative shifts dramatically when Mia Farrow calls the author to allege that Woody Allen is abusing her children, leading the author and his wife to visit Farrow's home in Connecticut where they learn details of allegations involving Soon-Yi and Dylan.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017353.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the family names) describing a social evening with President Bill and Hillary Clinton on Martha's Vineyard during the Jewish New Year. The text details a dinner at Savoir Faire Restaurant where the group discussed movies and health care, and shares a humorous anecdote about President Clinton refusing to share a large chocolate dessert with the narrator's son. The author concludes by contrasting Clinton's willingness to engage with Jewish traditions against former Soviet President Gorbachev's refusal to do so years prior.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity