Burnett Plaintiffs
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
NCB
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sultan
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-08-27 | N/A | Burnett Plaintiffs provided an 89-paragraph response. | Court | View |
| 2003-05-02 | N/A | Burnett Plaintiffs added Mohammad Bin Abdullah Al-Jomaith as a defendant. | Court (implied) | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Terrorist attacks (The heinous attacks of September 11, 2001). | USA | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017897.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (Federal Supplement) regarding the 'Burnett Plaintiffs' lawsuit against Al Rajhi Bank concerning liability for the September 11 attacks and terror financing. The text details allegations that Al Rajhi Bank and its owners funded fronts for Hamas (Tulkarm Charity Committee) and al Qaeda, and discusses the legal standards for liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp but does not mention Jeffrey Epstein; it focuses entirely on banking compliance and terrorism financing litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017890.jpg
This document is page 825 of a 2005 U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) opinion titled 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The text focuses on denying a motion by defendant Mr. Batterjee to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, citing his ties to Al Shamal Islamic Bank, Al Qaeda, and the Benevolence International Foundation (BIF), as well as his travel to Chicago and Florida. It also outlines the legal standards for a 'Failure to State a Claim' and the definition of material support under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA). The document bears a House Oversight stamp, but contains no textual references to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017858.jpg
This document is page 793 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the S.D.N.Y. regarding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and rules that alleged money laundering or charitable contributions by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Prince Sultan, and Prince Turki do not constitute 'commercial activity' that would strip them of sovereign immunity. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023400.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) concerning the litigation 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It discusses the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and establishes that facilitating international terrorism violates customary international law, citing various UN Security Council resolutions and case precedents. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023400' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee, possibly related to investigations into financial institutions.
Response to Motion
An 89-paragraph response provided by plaintiffs.
Second Addition and Removal of Defendants
Added defendant Mohammed Bin Abdullah Al-Jomaith.
Second Addition and Removal of Defendants
Added defendant Mohammed Bin Abdullah Al-Jomaith.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity