NCB
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ashton Plaintiffs
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Burnett Plaintiffs
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Sovereign Defendants
|
Co defendants |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
PIF
|
Ownership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
bin Mahfouz family
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
NCB
|
Family |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
US
|
Financial |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|
Instrumentality |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
PIF
|
Major shareholder of |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Authorization of limited jurisdictional discovery regarding PIF | Federal Court (USA) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denial of NCB's motion to dismiss | Federal Court (USA) | View |
| 2012-01-01 | N/A | Legal proceedings regarding Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 | Court | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Legal Opinion / Reconsideration ruling | Court | View |
| 2004-10-14 | N/A | Court heard oral argument from Defendants regarding failure to state a claim. | Court (S.D.N.Y.) | View |
| 2004-10-12 | N/A | Court heard oral argument from Defendants regarding motions to dismiss for lack of personal juris... | Court (S.D.N.Y.) | View |
| 2002-09-04 | N/A | Lawsuit filed | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2001-02-01 | N/A | SNCB Securities Inc. (NCB subsidiary) dissolved. | New York (Presumed) | View |
| 1998-02-17 | N/A | Closing of lawsuit Nat'l Commercial Bank v. Morgan Stanley Asset Mgmt., Inc. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 1995-07-24 | N/A | Termination of lawsuit Logan Feed v. Nat'l Commercial Bank. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | NCB closed its New York City branch office. | New York City | View |
EFTA00025392.pdf
This document is a Law360 email newsletter from July 21, 2020, summarizing various legal news stories. Key topics include the resentencing of Sheldon Silver, a harassment suit at Fox News, and the shooting at the home of Judge Esther Salas, which notes her involvement in a case concerning Deutsche Bank's ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The newsletter also covers various corporate litigations, bankruptcy rulings, and general counsel appointments.
EFTA00008120.pdf
This document is an excerpt from a book about massage therapy, specifically focusing on the art of receiving and giving massage. It covers terminology, finding a therapist, preparing for a session, setting the mood, and detailed instructions on massage techniques and body mechanics. The text provides practical advice for both clients and amateur practitioners.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018697.jpg
This document is a reference list or bibliography page, stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018697', likely from a book or report by Clarisse Thorn (referencing her book 'Confessions of a Pickup Artist Chaser'). The references focus on two main themes: sexual violence/trauma (including orgasm during assault) and the 'Pickup Artist' (PUA) community, citing figures like Neil Strauss, Tyler Durden, and Roissy. The document appears to be part of a larger investigation file, though the text itself does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018688.jpg
This document appears to be a page of endnotes or references from a larger work (likely by Clarisse Thorn, based on the self-referential link) discussing sexuality, BDSM, and feminism. It contains various hyperlinks to articles, blog posts, and psychology papers from the 2010-2012 timeframe. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was part of a document production for a US House of Representatives Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017932.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (392 F.Supp.2d 539) concerning the September 11 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the court's decision to prioritize personal jurisdiction discovery over subject matter jurisdiction (FSIA) for NCB to avoid intrusion into Saudi Arabia's sovereignty. The conclusion section lists rulings granting motions to dismiss for SHC, Prince Salman, and Prince Naif, while denying others.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017931.jpg
This document is page 28 of a Westlaw legal report regarding 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539). It discusses a legal motion for reconsideration filed by NCB (National Commercial Bank) regarding personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction under the FSIA. The text analyzes legal standards for reconsideration and jurisdiction, citing various precedents (Steel Co., Bush, etc.), but does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell on this specific page, despite the House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017930.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 Federal Court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It details the dismissal of civil RICO and ATA complaints against several SAAR Network executives (Al-Awani, Ashrafs, Mirza, Unus) due to lack of specific allegations connecting them to al Qaeda support. However, the court denied the motion to dismiss for Jamal Barzinji regarding material support claims, citing his control over bank accounts and alleged financial transfers to al Qaeda, while dismissing the RICO claim against him. It also briefly mentions a motion for reconsideration by NCB (National Commercial Bank).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017902.jpg
This document is page 837 of a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The page details the court's rulings on motions to dismiss filed by various Saudi defendants, including the SAAR Network, Adel A.J. Batterjee, the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), and members of the Saudi royal family (Prince Sultan, Prince Turki). While some motions were granted for lack of jurisdiction, others (such as those for SAAR Network and Batterjee) were denied, allowing claims to proceed. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was likely part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017901.jpg
This page from a legal opinion (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) addresses motions to dismiss in the Ashton and Burnett cases involving terrorism allegations. The court dismisses claims against Al Baraka and Mr. Kamel due to insufficient factual allegations, denies NCB's motion to dismiss without prejudice pending discovery on immunity and jurisdiction, and allows limited jurisdictional discovery regarding the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017893.jpg
This document is page 828 of a Federal Supplement legal opinion (likely 'In re Terrorist Attacks on Sept. 11, 2001') bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It details the dismissal of RICO and Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) claims against various Saudi banks and individuals (including the Saudi Binladin Group and Al Rajhi Bank) because the TVPA only applies to individuals acting under color of law, and the RICO claims failed to prove the defendants directed the enterprise. The text also introduces the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and references the September 11 attacks in a footnote. While labeled as 'Epstein-related' by the user (likely due to its inclusion in a House Oversight production regarding banking irregularities or Deutsche Bank), the text specifically concerns 9/11 litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017885.jpg
This document is page 820 from a Federal Supplement court opinion regarding the 'Burnett action,' a lawsuit related to the September 11 attacks. The text analyzes personal jurisdiction over Saudi defendants, specifically the National Commercial Bank (NCB) and Abdulrahman bin Mahfouz, detailing their alleged business ties to the U.S. and connections to entities accused of financing terrorism, such as the Blessed Relief Society (Muwaffaq). The court denies NCB's motion to dismiss but notes the complaint lacks specific actions by Mahfouz directed at the U.S. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017884.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001'. It details the arguments of National Commercial Bank (NCB) against US jurisdiction, citing the closure of its NYC branch in 1992, the dissolution of its subsidiary SNCB Securities Inc. in 2001, and its lack of physical presence or general business solicitation in the US. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017883.jpg
This document is a page from a Federal Supplement court opinion (likely In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details the court's decision to grant Mr. Al-Husani's motion to dismiss due to lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient evidence linking him to the 'Golden Chain' list of al Qaeda donors. The document also introduces the analysis of jurisdiction over NCB (National Commercial Bank), noting Plaintiffs' arguments regarding NCB's subsidiary in New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017857.jpg
This document is page 792 of a Federal Supplement legal opinion (likely In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, based on context and case citations). It discusses a motion by the National Commercial Bank (NCB) to dismiss a case based on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The court denies the motion without prejudice, ordering 'limited jurisdictional discovery' to determine if the Public Investment Fund (PIF) qualifies as a political subdivision of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The document also references exceptions to sovereign immunity, including 'state sponsor of terrorism' and 'commercial activities.' The footer indicates this document was part of a House Oversight Committee production. There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017856.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding the 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It discusses legal tests for sovereign immunity under the FSIA, specifically analyzing whether entities like the KDIC (Korea) and PIF (Saudi Public Investment Fund) qualify as organs of a foreign state or political subdivisions. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' bates stamp, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into foreign financial ties or the 9/11 litigation itself, though no specific mention of Jeffrey Epstein appears on this page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017855.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (Federal Supplement) included in a House Oversight Committee production (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017855). It analyzes the legal status of the Public Investment Fund (PIF) of Saudi Arabia under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), specifically referencing the 'Dole Food' Supreme Court standard for direct ownership. The text argues that for the National Commercial Bank (NCB) to enjoy immunity, the PIF (its owner) must be proven to be an organ or instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, citing affidavits from the Saudi Ministry of Finance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017854.jpg
This page is from a 2005 court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) regarding the immunity of Saudi officials and entities under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The court rules that Prince Sultan and Prince Turki are immune from suit for official acts. It also discusses the National Commercial Bank's (NCB) claim to immunity as a government instrumentality of Saudi Arabia, analyzing share ownership by the Public Investment Fund (PIF) and transactions involving the bin Mahfouz family.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017853.jpg
This document is page 788 from a legal opinion in the Federal Supplement (349 F.Supp.2d) discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). It addresses whether immunity extends to Prince Sultan and Prince Turki of Saudi Arabia for actions taken in their official capacities. The text references a complaint filed on September 10, 2003, where plaintiffs argued Prince Turki was not entitled to immunity because he was serving as the Ambassador to the UK at the time. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017852.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) detailing allegations against the National Commercial Bank (NCB) and its leadership, specifically Khalid bin Mahfouz. It discusses claims that NCB and the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) facilitated financial support for al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through charities and direct funding. The text references various legal complaints (Ashton, Burnett) and begins a discussion on the defendants' status under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017846.jpg
This document is page 781 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York concerning 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details procedural history, specifically oral arguments heard in October 2004 regarding motions to dismiss filed by various Saudi banking, corporate, and individual defendants (including the Binladin Group and Al Rajhi Bank) based on lack of jurisdiction or failure to state a claim. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry, though no direct textual link to Jeffrey Epstein appears on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023414.jpg
This document is a page of footnotes (97-116) from a legal filing related to 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The text discusses legal claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) against Saudi financial institutions, specifically Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank (SAMBA), and NCB, regarding allegations of material support provided to Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. It references various international treaties regarding aviation safety and terrorist bombings, and discusses the 'mental state' required for banking services to constitute material support of terrorism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023409.jpg
This document is page 49 of a legal brief or court opinion titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001,' printed via Westlaw. It discusses the legal necessity of jurisdictional discovery regarding 'Sovereign Defendants' and 'NCB' (National Commercial Bank), which claims to be an instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The text concludes by requesting the reversal of a lower court's dismissal of certain defendants and includes detailed footnotes referencing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), the 9/11 Commission Report, and CIA documents concerning Usama Bin Laden and Enaam Arnaout.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023408.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (sourced from Westlaw) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It argues for the reversal of dismissals for the Saudi Joint Relief Committee, Saudi Red Crescent Society, and National Commercial Bank based on the precedent set in 'Doe v. Bin Laden' regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, though the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023407.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or opinion related to the litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (In re: Terrorist Attacks). It argues against a district court's dismissal of claims, contending that defendants who provided material support to al-Qaeda through intermediaries or 'front charities' should be held liable under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA). It specifically critiques the reasoning of Judge Daniels, comparing it to his predecessor Judge Casey, and cites various legal precedents regarding indirect support of terrorism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023382.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (2012 WL 257568) related to 9/11 terrorist attacks litigation, specifically detailing the financial infrastructure of al-Qaeda. It describes the interconnections between Osama bin Laden, various financial institutions (Al Shamal, Faisal Islamic Bank, Tadamon, Al Rajhi Bank), and individuals designated as terrorists or sponsors. It notably discusses the discovery of the 'Golden Chain' document in Bosnia, which identified major financial benefactors of al-Qaeda.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity